嗯，有本《Ray Tracing from the Ground Up》[1]，虽然有点过时了（2007 年的书），但对很多话题都进行了深入探讨。作者还讨论了这一路上可能遇到的坑。有几章内容是…
Well, there is the book "Ray Tracing from the Ground Up" [1], which although a bit outdated (stemming from 2007), gives in-depth discussions on many of the topics. The author discusses possible pitfalls on the way as well. There are a few chapters, which are…
Kevin Suffern 写的《Ray Tracing from the Ground Up》。我大一时只对 C++ 略懂皮毛就啃起了这本书，跟着它做出了一个支持景深和全局光照的光追渲染器，…
Ray Tracing from the Ground Up, by Kevin Suffern As a college freshman I started this book with only a passing familiarity to C++ and was able to follow it to implement a raytracer that supported depth of field and global illumination,…
如果你还想深入搞懂数学原理，我非常推荐 Kevin Suffern 写的《Ray Tracing from the Ground Up》[1]。这本书专注于光线追踪的理论和数学，并用 C++ 来构建光追器。不过代码写得很简单，解释得极其透彻，所以你完全可以把它移植到…
If you want a deep-dive into the mathematics as well, I really liked Ray Tracing from the Ground Up by Kevin Suffern [1]. The book focuses on the theory and mathematics of ray tracing, and uses C++ to build a ray tracer. The code however is simple and explained really well so you could adapt it to the…
…视频形式不适合你，我建议至少跟着它的目录走，然后去查具体的各个知识点。那本黑皮书里收录了不少：https://www.jagregory.com/abrash-black-book/ 光线追踪方面，可以看《Ray Tracing from the Ground Up》：https://www.amazon.in/Ray-Tracing-Ground-Kevin-Suffern/dp/15... 接着肯定有人会跳出来说 PBRT 那本书（https://www.pbrt.org/）更好或者更全面，这倒是真的，但是…
…video format is not for you, I would at least follow the contents, then look up the individual pieces. The black book has a number of them: https://www.jagregory.com/abrash-black-book/ For ray tracing, Ray Tracing from the Ground Up: https://www.amazon.in/Ray-Tracing-Ground-Kevin-Suffern/dp/15... Then people will jump in to say that the PBRT book (https://www.pbrt.org/) is a better or more comprehensive source, and it is true, but…
我同意楼主的看法，那本书里的文学化编程（literate programming）简直让人烦躁、极其让人分心。我更喜欢先讲理论、后给代码。《Ray Tracing From the Ground Up》在我看来做得好得多（尽管它涉及的主题也只占 PBR 那本书的一小部分）。
I agree with OP and find the literal programming in that book incredibly distracting and annoying. I prefer the theory up front and the code later. "Ray Tracing From the Ground Up" does a much better job in my opinion (although it also only covers a fraction of the topics in the PBR book.)
嗯，有本《Ray Tracing from the Ground Up》[1]，虽然有点过时了（2007 年的书），但对很多话题都进行了深入探讨。作者还讨论了这一路上可能遇到的坑。有几章内容是…
Well, there is the book "Ray Tracing from the Ground Up" [1], which although a bit outdated (stemming from 2007), gives in-depth discussions on many of the topics. The author discusses possible pitfalls on the way as well. There are a few chapters, which are…
Kevin Suffern 写的《Ray Tracing from the Ground Up》。我大一时只对 C++ 略懂皮毛就啃起了这本书，跟着它做出了一个支持景深和全局光照的光追渲染器，…
Ray Tracing from the Ground Up, by Kevin Suffern As a college freshman I started this book with only a passing familiarity to C++ and was able to follow it to implement a raytracer that supported depth of field and global illumination,…
如果你还想深入搞懂数学原理，我非常推荐 Kevin Suffern 写的《Ray Tracing from the Ground Up》[1]。这本书专注于光线追踪的理论和数学，并用 C++ 来构建光追器。不过代码写得很简单，解释得极其透彻，所以你完全可以把它移植到…
If you want a deep-dive into the mathematics as well, I really liked Ray Tracing from the Ground Up by Kevin Suffern [1]. The book focuses on the theory and mathematics of ray tracing, and uses C++ to build a ray tracer. The code however is simple and explained really well so you could adapt it to the…
…视频形式不适合你，我建议至少跟着它的目录走，然后去查具体的各个知识点。那本黑皮书里收录了不少：https://www.jagregory.com/abrash-black-book/ 光线追踪方面，可以看《Ray Tracing from the Ground Up》：https://www.amazon.in/Ray-Tracing-Ground-Kevin-Suffern/dp/15... 接着肯定有人会跳出来说 PBRT 那本书（https://www.pbrt.org/）更好或者更全面，这倒是真的，但是…
…video format is not for you, I would at least follow the contents, then look up the individual pieces. The black book has a number of them: https://www.jagregory.com/abrash-black-book/ For ray tracing, Ray Tracing from the Ground Up: https://www.amazon.in/Ray-Tracing-Ground-Kevin-Suffern/dp/15... Then people will jump in to say that the PBRT book (https://www.pbrt.org/) is a better or more comprehensive source, and it is true, but…
当初刚开始学光追的时候，我读《Ray Tracing from the Ground Up》读得挺过瘾的。http://www.raytracegroundup.com/
I quite enjoyed Ray Tracing from the Ground Up when I was learning ray tracing for the first time. http://www.raytracegroundup.com/
我同意楼主的看法，那本书里的文学化编程（literate programming）简直让人烦躁、极其让人分心。我更喜欢先讲理论、后给代码。《Ray Tracing From the Ground Up》在我看来做得好得多（尽管它涉及的主题也只占 PBR 那本书的一小部分）。
I agree with OP and find the literal programming in that book incredibly distracting and annoying. I prefer the theory up front and the code later. "Ray Tracing From the Ground Up" does a much better job in my opinion (although it also only covers a fraction of the topics in the PBR book.)