I was intrigued by the reference to "Ovid’s frank advice on meeting women at the theater". This seems to refer to the "Ars Amatoria" which is an interesting read in its own right. Wikipedia article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ars_Amatoria Full text (English translation):http://www.poetryintranslation.com/PITBR/Latin/Artoflovehome...
Ars amatoria - Ovid (a book on picking up women, TL;DR: things have not changed much since back in the ancient Rome) On speeches - Cicero (the only book that breaks down a speech is such a detail, same thing as above)…
One cool thing about learning Latin in high school was reading books from two-thousand years ago. Take Ovid's Ars Amatoria for example. He was the original PUA (from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ars_Amatoria): "The first two books, aimed at men, contain sections which cover such topics as 'not forgetting her birthday',…
The founder seems to have missed the opportunity to make a classical reference to Ovid's writing on love, instead constructing some ungrammatical Latin. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ars_Amatoria
Because many men feel lonely and sexually invisible. Isn't there a trend that goes a lot further back than that? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ars_Amatoria https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Les_Liaisons_dangereuses Looking at my collection of literature I see some evidence of a "seduction industry" aimed at woman from 1945 to 2000 or so, but today I think…
我对文中提到的“奥维德关于在剧院搭讪女人的坦率建议”很感兴趣。这似乎是指《Ars Amatoria》（爱的艺术），这本书本身就非常值得一读。Wikipedia 条目：http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ars_Amatoria 英文译本全文：http://www.poetryintranslation.com/PITBR/Latin/Artoflovehome...
I was intrigued by the reference to "Ovid’s frank advice on meeting women at the theater". This seems to refer to the "Ars Amatoria" which is an interesting read in its own right. Wikipedia article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ars_Amatoria Full text (English translation):http://www.poetryintranslation.com/PITBR/Latin/Artoflovehome...
《Ars amatoria》——奥维德（一本泡妞指南，太长不看版：从古罗马时代到现在，其实事情没多大变化）《On speeches》——西塞罗（唯一一本把演讲剖析得如此详尽的书，跟上面同理）……
Ars amatoria - Ovid (a book on picking up women, TL;DR: things have not changed much since back in the ancient Rome) On speeches - Cicero (the only book that breaks down a speech is such a detail, same thing as above)…
高中学拉丁文的一大乐事就是能读两千年前的书。拿奥维德的《Ars Amatoria》来说。他就是最早的 PUA（摘自 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ars_Amatoria）：“前两卷面向男性，包含诸如‘不要忘记她的生日’等主题的内容，……
One cool thing about learning Latin in high school was reading books from two-thousand years ago. Take Ovid's Ars Amatoria for example. He was the original PUA (from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ars_Amatoria): "The first two books, aimed at men, contain sections which cover such topics as 'not forgetting her birthday',…
创始人似乎错失了引用奥维德关于爱情的著作这一古典梗的机会，反而造出了些不合语法的拉丁文。https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ars_Amatoria
The founder seems to have missed the opportunity to make a classical reference to Ovid's writing on love, instead constructing some ungrammatical Latin. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ars_Amatoria
因为很多男人感到孤独，且在性层面上毫无存在感。难道这不是一个老早以前就有的趋势吗？https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ars_Amatoria https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Les_Liaisons_dangereuses 看看我收藏的文学作品，我能发现从 1945 年到 2000 年左右针对女性的“诱惑产业”的一些证据，但如今我认为……
Because many men feel lonely and sexually invisible. Isn't there a trend that goes a lot further back than that? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ars_Amatoria https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Les_Liaisons_dangereuses Looking at my collection of literature I see some evidence of a "seduction industry" aimed at woman from 1945 to 2000 or so, but today I think…