经济的本质
The nature of economies
Jane Jacobs · 初版 2000 年
3人推荐
4位读者提及
5次提及
在 The Death and Life of Great American Cities 彻底改变城市研究领域近四十年后，Jane Jacobs 为我们带来了一部关于经济与生态的现代经典。这本新书审视了经济与自然之间的联系，指出这两个系统所共有的发展原则，才是经济学研究应有的真正课题。《The Nature of Economics》以柏拉图式对话录的形式写成，记录了五位当代纽约人喝咖啡时的交谈。他们探讨的核心问题是：经济生活是否遵循着与自然界系统相同的法则？
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
……事实是这座城市缺乏产生财富的内部引擎，因此从根本上是不可持续的。（顺便说一句，我对城市经济学思考的基础来自 Jane Jacobs——强烈推荐《The Nature of Economies》作为快速了解她哲学思想的入门书。）Arcosanti 的发展缺乏稳健的经济理论支撑——事实上我认为那里对经济学普遍存在轻视/不信任，这在……当中屡见不鲜。
…fact that the city lacks an internal engine for wealth generation, and is thus fundamentally unsustainable. (My foundation for thinking about urban economics, BTW is Jane Jacobs -- highly recommend "The Nature of Economies" for a quick primer on her philosophy.) Arcosanti was developed in the absence of a robust economic theory -- in fact I'd say there was a general distain / distrust of economics, as was often found amongst…
18 年前，Jane Jacobs 出版了《The Nature of Economies》，明确地将仿生学原理应用到经济哲学中。这书绝对精彩绝伦，自那以后就成了我经济学思考的基石。而且，这也算是一种略带讽刺意味的……
18 years ago Jane Jacobs published The Nature of Economies, which explicitly applies principles of biomimicry to economic philosophy. It's absolutely brilliant and has been the cornerstone of my economic thinking ever since. Also, it's been a somewhat sardonic…
Jane Jacobs 写的《The Nature of Economies》。虽然人们吐槽它的写法，但它依然是一部有趣的探索，探讨了自然生态系统与人类经济之间的相似之处。作为一个没有什么特殊……的人
The Nature of Economies by Jane Jacobs People complain about how it's written, but it's nevertheless an interesting exploration of the parallels between natural ecosystems and human economies. As someone with no particular…
Jane Jacobs：《The Nature of Economies》。
Jane Jacobs: The Nature of Economies.
>苏格拉底式对话需要你写对白，而只有一部分人有这种笔头功夫。Jane Jacobs 的倒数第二本书《The Nature of Economies》就是一个绝佳的反面教材，它被写成了一场苏格拉底式对话，遗憾的是，对话者是一群让人难以忍受的时髦纽约客。她表达的想法（一如既往地）是一流的，但呈现方式简直读不下去。
>Socratic dialogue requires you to write dialogue, which only some people have the ear for. A great negative case study for this is Jane Jacobs' second-last book, The Nature of Economies, which was written as a socratic dialogue among, regrettably, a bunch of insufferable hip urban New Yorkers. The ideas she expresses are first-rate (as usual), but the presentation borders on the unreadable.