…becomes path-dependent! Not really. The problem is that we have sort of an "electron abstraction" which is incorrect in the Heaviside-Hertz pedagogy when fields start to store energy. I recommend "Collective Electrodynamics" by Carver Mead as a modern formulation without the silliness of an Aether: https://www.amazon.com/Collective-Electrodynamics-Quantum-Fo... > I only brought up ground (in the Earth ground sense) because…
…everybody knew was an incorrect prediction. Except that Einstein WASN'T wrong--if you put an excited atom in a photon trap and isolate it from the rest of the universe it's decay time goes way up. See: "Collective Electrodynamics" by Carver Mead http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/collective-electrodynamics
…hole is a collective effect, i.e. one that requires the participation of many electrons (as well as the atom's nucleus that accounts for the hole's positive charge). Those who want to learn more about "collective electrodynamics" may consult a book by Carver Mead.
…(which don't work in motors, LOL)--and the attendant difficulty in understanding Maxwell's theory. However, if you have vector analysis and fields, then you can understand formulations like Carver Mead's "Collective Electrodynamics": https://www.amazon.com/Collective-Electrodynamics-Quantum-Fo... Suddenly, emag is a whole lot more straightforward to understand. It's not EASY as it's very math heavy, but it has a lot fewer weird…
我很确定这就是你想要的：《Collective Electrodynamics: Quantum Foundations of Electromagnetism》 https://www.amazon.com/Collective-Electrodynamics-Quantum-Fo...
I'm pretty sure this is what you want: "Collective Electrodynamics: Quantum Foundations of Electromagnetism" https://www.amazon.com/Collective-Electrodynamics-Quantum-Fo...
…big ones) where you really want a field description. Of course, a field description makes nothing simple and closed form. So, it isn't good for making exams out of. If you can deal with 4-vectors, "Collective Electrodynamics" is a really good book.
……就变成路径依赖了！其实也不是。问题在于，当场开始储存能量时，我们有的那种“电子抽象”在 Heaviside-Hertz 教学法里是不正确的。我推荐 Carver Mead 的《Collective Electrodynamics》，它提供了一种现代表述，没有以太那种愚蠢的东西：https://www.amazon.com/Collective-Electrodynamics-Quantum-Fo... > 我提到接地（地球接地意义上的）只是因为……
…becomes path-dependent! Not really. The problem is that we have sort of an "electron abstraction" which is incorrect in the Heaviside-Hertz pedagogy when fields start to store energy. I recommend "Collective Electrodynamics" by Carver Mead as a modern formulation without the silliness of an Aether: https://www.amazon.com/Collective-Electrodynamics-Quantum-Fo... > I only brought up ground (in the Earth ground sense) because…
……大家都知道那是个错误的预测。只不过爱因斯坦并没有错——如果你把一个激发态原子放进光子陷阱，并把它与宇宙其余部分隔离开来，它的衰变时间会大大延长。参见：Carver Mead 的《Collective Electrodynamics》 http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/collective-electrodynamics
…everybody knew was an incorrect prediction. Except that Einstein WASN'T wrong--if you put an excited atom in a photon trap and isolate it from the rest of the universe it's decay time goes way up. See: "Collective Electrodynamics" by Carver Mead http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/collective-electrodynamics
……空穴是一种集体效应，也就是说，它需要许多电子的参与（以及原子核，原子核解释了空穴的正电荷）。想进一步了解“集体电动力学”的人可以查阅 Carver Mead 的一本书。
…hole is a collective effect, i.e. one that requires the participation of many electrons (as well as the atom's nucleus that accounts for the hole's positive charge). Those who want to learn more about "collective electrodynamics" may consult a book by Carver Mead.
……（这些东西在电机里不工作，哈哈）——以及随之而来的理解麦克斯韦理论的困难。不过，如果你掌握了矢量分析和场，那么你就能理解像 Carver Mead 的《Collective Electrodynamics》这样的表述：https://www.amazon.com/Collective-Electrodynamics-Quantum-Fo... 突然间，电磁学理解起来就直截了当多了。它并不简单，因为数学很重，但奇怪的东西少了很多……
…(which don't work in motors, LOL)--and the attendant difficulty in understanding Maxwell's theory. However, if you have vector analysis and fields, then you can understand formulations like Carver Mead's "Collective Electrodynamics": https://www.amazon.com/Collective-Electrodynamics-Quantum-Fo... Suddenly, emag is a whole lot more straightforward to understand. It's not EASY as it's very math heavy, but it has a lot fewer weird…
我很确定这就是你想要的：《Collective Electrodynamics: Quantum Foundations of Electromagnetism》 https://www.amazon.com/Collective-Electrodynamics-Quantum-Fo...
I'm pretty sure this is what you want: "Collective Electrodynamics: Quantum Foundations of Electromagnetism" https://www.amazon.com/Collective-Electrodynamics-Quantum-Fo...
……（大的那些）你真正需要场描述的地方。当然，场描述不会让任何事情变得简单和封闭。所以，它不适合用来出考试题。如果你能应付四维矢量，《Collective Electrodynamics》是一本非常好的书。
…big ones) where you really want a field description. Of course, a field description makes nothing simple and closed form. So, it isn't good for making exams out of. If you can deal with 4-vectors, "Collective Electrodynamics" is a really good book.