…also allows you to "bookmark" a puzzle for review later on. The philosophy behind the training regiment is inspired by the following two books which have been very helpful in improving my game: reading Rapid Chess Improvement, The Woodpecker Method.
……你们俩都低于 2000 分，复盘时连明显的战术都会漏掉，这根本无法真正提升你的象棋思维。最后一件事：“400天涨400分”的训练法出自《Rapid Chess Improvement》这本书，我并不推荐初学者读（不过那套马的练习还不错）。在书里，Michael De La Maza 浪费时间狂喷 Jeremy Silman 以及国际象棋的策略路线。有些人……
…you're both sub-2000, you'll both miss obvious tactics even as you review the game, which doesn't really improve your chess thought. One last thing: the 400 points in 400 days training comes from the book Rapid Chess Improvement, which I do not recommend for the beginning player (the knight exercise is good, though). In it, Michael De La Maza wastes time blasting Jeremy Silman and the strategic approach to chess games. Some people…
…being one of the best chess coaches in the world when he was alive) review of his book: https://web.archive.org/web/20190911065113/dev.jeremysilman.... > When all is said and done, I can’t recommend Rapid Chess Improvement (a book that, in my view, offers a philosophically bankrupt vision of what chess is). It smacks of "the blind leading the blind.” But, as I said earlier, his book might prove useful for some. Also, a…
……还允许你把一道残局题“加书签”以便日后复习。这个训练体系背后的理念启发自以下两本书，它们对我棋力的提升非常有帮助：读《Rapid Chess Improvement》和《The Woodpecker Method》。
…also allows you to "bookmark" a puzzle for review later on. The philosophy behind the training regiment is inspired by the following two books which have been very helpful in improving my game: reading Rapid Chess Improvement, The Woodpecker Method.
……你们俩都低于 2000 分，复盘时连明显的战术都会漏掉，这根本无法真正提升你的象棋思维。最后一件事：“400天涨400分”的训练法出自《Rapid Chess Improvement》这本书，我并不推荐初学者读（不过那套马的练习还不错）。在书里，Michael De La Maza 浪费时间狂喷 Jeremy Silman 以及国际象棋的策略路线。有些人……
…you're both sub-2000, you'll both miss obvious tactics even as you review the game, which doesn't really improve your chess thought. One last thing: the 400 points in 400 days training comes from the book Rapid Chess Improvement, which I do not recommend for the beginning player (the knight exercise is good, though). In it, Michael De La Maza wastes time blasting Jeremy Silman and the strategic approach to chess games. Some people…
……是他活着时世界上最好的国际象棋教练之一）对他书的评价：https://web.archive.org/web/20190911065113/dev.jeremysilman.... > 说到底，我没法推荐《Rapid Chess Improvement》（在我看来，这本书对国际象棋本质的理解在哲学层面上是一文不值的）。它透着一股“盲人骑瞎马，瞎子引瞎子”的味道。但是，就像我之前说的，他的书可能对某些人有用。另外，……
…being one of the best chess coaches in the world when he was alive) review of his book: https://web.archive.org/web/20190911065113/dev.jeremysilman.... > When all is said and done, I can’t recommend Rapid Chess Improvement (a book that, in my view, offers a philosophically bankrupt vision of what chess is). It smacks of "the blind leading the blind.” But, as I said earlier, his book might prove useful for some. Also, a…