因为 HN 上的推荐，我正在读 James Reason 的《人类错误》（Human Error）[1]。到目前为止写得太棒了。至于软件错误，我们做了太多事情（规范的代码风格指南、结对编程、code review）来限制…
I'm reading through Human Error by James Reason [1], on the basis of a HN recommendation. It's been excellent so far. As regards software error, we do so many things (standard style guides, pair programming, code reviews) to limit…
有人在 HN 上推荐过 James Reason 的《人类错误》（Human Error）：https://www.amazon.com/Human-Error-James-Reason/dp/052131419... 我不确定它有多全面/新潮（不是我的专业领域），但我读得很过瘾。而且它提供了至少一个…
Someone recommended Human Error by James Reason on HN: https://www.amazon.com/Human-Error-James-Reason/dp/052131419... I'm not sure how comprehensive / modern it is (not my subfield), but I enjoyed it. And it provided at least one…
因为 HN 上的推荐，我正在读 James Reason 的《人类错误》（Human Error）[1]。到目前为止写得太棒了。至于软件错误，我们做了太多事情（规范的代码风格指南、结对编程、code review）来限制…
I'm reading through Human Error by James Reason [1], on the basis of a HN recommendation. It's been excellent so far. As regards software error, we do so many things (standard style guides, pair programming, code reviews) to limit…
有人在 HN 上推荐过 James Reason 的《人类错误》（Human Error）：https://www.amazon.com/Human-Error-James-Reason/dp/052131419... 我不确定它有多全面/新潮（不是我的专业领域），但我读得很过瘾。而且它提供了至少一个…
Someone recommended Human Error by James Reason on HN: https://www.amazon.com/Human-Error-James-Reason/dp/052131419... I'm not sure how comprehensive / modern it is (not my subfield), but I enjoyed it. And it provided at least one…
如果你手上没有的话，这是一本神书：https://www.amazon.com/Human-Error-James-Reason/dp/052131419... 00 年代在德雷塞尔大学（Drexel）用过。
If you didn't have one, this is a great book: https://www.amazon.com/Human-Error-James-Reason/dp/052131419... Was used at Drexel in the 00s.
这篇文章里的理论基于 James Reason 的《人类错误》（Human Error）。
The theory in this article is based on "Human Error" by James Reason.