> danger of invasive species For a good counter to all the "invasive biology" craze see: https://www.amazon.com/Invasion-Biology-Pseudoscience-David-... He raises many good points. Much damage to the eocology has been done in removing "invasive" species. Now, diseses, those can really devestate. I'd love to still have our (US)…
…and authors) to see what credence I should lend them. The little I could find out about this book was a review at [0] that concludes with "I would not recommend this book to those beginning a study of Invasion Biology. It is a polemic presumably aimed at the practitioners of what the author holds is a pseudoscience, and perhaps also at policy‐makers." Make of that what you will. [0] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4242384/
> 梵特诺法（Ventnor Method） 野性园艺、农林复合经营、朴门永续（permaculture）等等。为什么人们总觉得非要把基础概念换个新名字不可呢？不管怎么说，它看起来和入侵生物学的理论与批评非常接近。参考：- 《入侵生物学：对一门伪科学的批判》（Invasion Biology: Critique of a Pseudoscience，学术著作） - 《新野生：为什么入侵物种会拯救大自然》（The New Wild: Why Invasive Species Will Be Nature's Salvation，科普书） - 《对情境偏差的系统性审查……》（A systematic review of context bias in…
> the Ventnor Method wild gardening, agroforestry, permaculture, etc. Why do people feel the need to rename basic ideas Anyways it seems very adjacent to theories and criticisms of invasion biology. See: - Invasion Biology: Critique of a Pseudoscience (academic book) - The New Wild: Why Invasive Species Will Be Nature's Salvation (popular science book) - A systematic review of context bias in…
> 外来物种的危害 想要反驳目前火热的“入侵生物学”狂潮，可以参考：https://www.amazon.com/Invasion-Biology-Pseudoscience-David-... 他提出了很多很好的观点。在清除“入侵”物种的过程中，已经对生态造成了极大的破坏。不过疾病嘛，那确实能造成毁灭性打击。要是我们（美国）还能保留……
> danger of invasive species For a good counter to all the "invasive biology" craze see: https://www.amazon.com/Invasion-Biology-Pseudoscience-David-... He raises many good points. Much damage to the eocology has been done in removing "invasive" species. Now, diseses, those can really devestate. I'd love to still have our (US)…
……以及作者），看看他们到底有几分可信度。关于这本书我能找到的一点信息就是 [0] 处的一篇书评，结尾总结道：“我不推荐刚开始研究入侵生物学的人读这本书。这是一篇辩难之作，大概是冲着那些被作者认为是搞伪科学的从业者去的，可能也是写给决策者看的。”见仁见智吧。[0] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4242384/
…and authors) to see what credence I should lend them. The little I could find out about this book was a review at [0] that concludes with "I would not recommend this book to those beginning a study of Invasion Biology. It is a polemic presumably aimed at the practitioners of what the author holds is a pseudoscience, and perhaps also at policy‐makers." Make of that what you will. [0] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4242384/
> 梵特诺法（Ventnor Method） 野性园艺、农林复合经营、朴门永续（permaculture）等等。为什么人们总觉得非要把基础概念换个新名字不可呢？不管怎么说，它看起来和入侵生物学的理论与批评非常接近。参考：- 《入侵生物学：对一门伪科学的批判》（Invasion Biology: Critique of a Pseudoscience，学术著作） - 《新野生：为什么入侵物种会拯救大自然》（The New Wild: Why Invasive Species Will Be Nature's Salvation，科普书） - 《对情境偏差的系统性审查……》（A systematic review of context bias in…
> the Ventnor Method wild gardening, agroforestry, permaculture, etc. Why do people feel the need to rename basic ideas Anyways it seems very adjacent to theories and criticisms of invasion biology. See: - Invasion Biology: Critique of a Pseudoscience (academic book) - The New Wild: Why Invasive Species Will Be Nature's Salvation (popular science book) - A systematic review of context bias in…