…profit. They don't take a hit of 250%, their profits are just reduced by ~2.5x. US has famously high drug prices due so cutting edge pharma makes much of its profits there. This is all standard 101 International Economics, Paul Krugman has written the standard textbook for it, it's a fun read.
…在实践中执行……许多经济学家在原则上对幼稚产业论持怀疑态度……保护对于幼稚产业的成长并不是必需的。”保罗·克鲁格曼在《国际经济学：理论与政策》（International Economics: Theory and Policy）[2]中花了几页讨论这个问题，提到“幼稚产业论看起来非常有道理，事实上也确实说服了许多政府。然而经济学家们指出了该论点中的诸多陷阱，…
…implement in practice...many economists are skeptical about the infant-industry argument in principle...Protection is not necessary for an infant industry to grow." Paul Krugman spends a few pages on it in International Economics: Theory and Policy[2], saying "The infant industry argument seems highly plausible, and in fact it has been persuasive to many governments. Yet economists have pointed out many pitfalls in the argument,…
…利润。他们并不是遭受了 250% 的重创，只是利润缩水了约 2.5 倍。美国药价高是出了名的，所以顶尖药企的大部分利润都来自那里。这都是标准的国际经济学 101 内容，保罗·克鲁格曼写过一本标准教材，读起来挺有意思的。
…profit. They don't take a hit of 250%, their profits are just reduced by ~2.5x. US has famously high drug prices due so cutting edge pharma makes much of its profits there. This is all standard 101 International Economics, Paul Krugman has written the standard textbook for it, it's a fun read.
…在实践中执行……许多经济学家在原则上对幼稚产业论持怀疑态度……保护对于幼稚产业的成长并不是必需的。”保罗·克鲁格曼在《国际经济学：理论与政策》（International Economics: Theory and Policy）[2]中花了几页讨论这个问题，提到“幼稚产业论看起来非常有道理，事实上也确实说服了许多政府。然而经济学家们指出了该论点中的诸多陷阱，…
…implement in practice...many economists are skeptical about the infant-industry argument in principle...Protection is not necessary for an infant industry to grow." Paul Krugman spends a few pages on it in International Economics: Theory and Policy[2], saying "The infant industry argument seems highly plausible, and in fact it has been persuasive to many governments. Yet economists have pointed out many pitfalls in the argument,…
可能咱们用的是同一本教材，因为我也是从那儿听说的。克鲁格曼和奥伯斯法尔德的《国际经济学》（International Economics）？
Perhaps we had the same textbook, because that's also where I heard that from. Krugman and Obstfeld, International Economics?