言论自由归我——但不归你
Free speech for me--but not for thee
Nat Hentoff · 初版 1992 年
2人推荐
3位读者提及
5次提及
多年来，Nat Hentoff 一直是美国宪法 First Amendment 崇高精神与条文最著名的民间捍卫者。他坚定倡导人人享有言论自由的原则，在当今时代似乎比以往任何时候都更加迫切——当下，言论自由正遭受令人震惊的抨击，这不仅来自政治右翼的传统反对者（那些因被其视为淫秽、激进或其他禁忌的言论而感到冒犯的人），也来自左翼——呼吁取缔色情内容的激进女权主义者，以及禁止他们认为会造成心理伤害
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
……理解为什么。原因在于所有这些平台内置的不透明性，未知的第三方在对内容采取行动，而参与对话的人却一无所知。另见《我的言论自由——但你没有：美国左右两派是如何互掐并无情审查彼此的》（Free speech for me--but not for thee : how the American left and right relentlessly censor each other）[3]（Nat Hentoff，1992）[1] https://twitter.com/noUpside/status/1599532506252214272 [2] https://www.wired.com/story/free-speech-is-not-the-same-as-f...…
…understand why. The reason is due to the secrecy built into all of these platforms where an unknown third party is actioning content without anyone involved in the conversation knowing about it. See also Free speech for me--but not for thee : how the American left and right relentlessly censor each other [3] (Nat Hentoff, 1992) [1] https://twitter.com/noUpside/status/1599532506252214272 [2] https://www.wired.com/story/free-speech-is-not-the-same-as-f...…
> 是的，确实，但是 “我相信言论自由，但是……”这种口头禅太常见了，以至于第一修正案律师经常拿它开玩笑 [1] [2]。“言论自由属于我——但不属于你”（Free speech for me— but not for thee）也是纳特·亨托夫（Nat Hentoff）写的一本好书的书名 [3]。我个人很喜欢 ACLU 创始人罗杰·鲍德温（Roger Baldwin）对历史学家小阿瑟·施莱辛格（Arthur Schlesinger, Jr.）说的那番话：> 阿瑟：“到底有什么理由能……
> Yes, yes, but The refrain "I believe in free speech, BUT" is so common that first amendment lawyers regularly joke about it [1] [2]. "Free speech for me— but not for thee" is also the title of an excellent book by Nat Hentoff [3] Personally I like how ACLU founder Roger Baldwin put it to historian Arthur Schlesigner, Jr.: > Arthur: "What possible reason is there for…
我很怀念纳特·亨托夫（Nat Hentoff）。《我的言论自由——但你没有》（Free Speech for Me--But Not for Thee）现在看来简直就是神预言。
I miss Nat Hentoff. Free Speech for Me--But Not for Thee feels prophetic now.
《我的言论自由——但你没有：美国左右两派是如何无情地互相审查的》（1992）[1] 是一本好读物，它讲述了我们是如何沦落到如今这种跨意识形态沟通能力几乎全面崩塌的境地的……
Free Speech for Me--But Not for Thee: How the American Left and Right Relentlessly Censor Each Other (1992) [1] is a good read on how we got to a point where our ability to communicate across ideologies appears to be broken in many ways.…
……言论和学术相关的事情。布鲁斯特（Brewster）解除了禁令。两个学生团体重新邀请了华莱士（Wallace）。华莱士拒绝了，尽管他确实在其他常春藤盟校发表演讲过。在你引用的亨托夫（Hentoff）的书《我的言论自由——但你没有》第 104-106 页有更详尽的描述。这里还有 4 篇文章，可以补全该事件基于现实的版本：https://yalecollege.yale.edu/get-know-yale-college/office-de... 《纽约时报》2017 年文章《Free Speech, Personified》……
…speech and academic stuff. Brewster removes block. Two student groups reinvite Wallace. Wallace declines, though he did speak at other Ivy League schools. Described more fully p104-106 in Hentoff's book "Free speech for me--but not for thee", which you cited. Here's 4 more articles, to round out the reality-based version of that incident: https://yalecollege.yale.edu/get-know-yale-college/office-de... "Free Speech, Personified" NYT [2017]…