这不是我的领域，但顺手贴个链接以防有用：Steven M. LaValle 写的《Planning Algorithms》http://planning.cs.uiuc.edu/ > 本书对许多不同种类的规划算法进行了统一的阐述。这一学科横跨机器人学、控制论……
Not my field, but in case this link is helpful: "Planning Algorithms" by Steven M. LaValle http://planning.cs.uiuc.edu/ >This book presents a unified treatment of many different kinds of planning algorithms. The subject lies at the crossroads between robotics, control…
…plans according to some heuristic and choose the best, then repeat. It is not magic. There is a serious craft and engineering to it. You can read a good introduction to different approaches in Lavalle’s Planning Algorithms book if you are so interested.
……在深入钻研它们之前先得具备数学素养。说到导航，如果你对运动规划感兴趣，比如怎么以最优（安全且高效）的方式从 A 点到达 B 点，那你应该去读 Steven M. Lavalle 的《Planning Algorithms》http://lavalle.pl/planning/，看看数学家们为了解决这个问题都想出了哪些绝妙招数。在机器人以外的领域也有很多很酷的应用，比如计算机图形学/动画……
…math literacy before diving into them. Speaking of navigation, if you're interested in motion planning i.e. how to optimally (safely and efficiently) go from point A to point B, what you read is Planning Algorithms by Steven M. Lavalle http://lavalle.pl/planning/ for various ways the math people have came up with to solve this. Many cool applications in fields outside of robotics like in Computer Graphics/Animation…
…fields. Engineering is no different. Would you be mad at Thrun for publishing and profiting from Probablistic Robotics while publishing academic papers on the same subject? I wasn't. Though le valle's "Planning Algorithms" was released free and has arguably done better, that model is not the state of the art in most academic publishing.
这不是我的领域，但顺手贴个链接以防有用：Steven M. LaValle 写的《Planning Algorithms》http://planning.cs.uiuc.edu/ > 本书对许多不同种类的规划算法进行了统一的阐述。这一学科横跨机器人学、控制论……
Not my field, but in case this link is helpful: "Planning Algorithms" by Steven M. LaValle http://planning.cs.uiuc.edu/ >This book presents a unified treatment of many different kinds of planning algorithms. The subject lies at the crossroads between robotics, control…
……根据某种启发式方法生成规划并选出最优方案，然后循环往复。这不是什么魔法，背后是非常严谨的工艺和工程实现。如果你感兴趣的话，可以在 Lavalle 的《Planning Algorithms》一书中读到各种不同方案的绝佳入门介绍。
…plans according to some heuristic and choose the best, then repeat. It is not magic. There is a serious craft and engineering to it. You can read a good introduction to different approaches in Lavalle’s Planning Algorithms book if you are so interested.
……在深入钻研它们之前先得具备数学素养。说到导航，如果你对运动规划感兴趣，比如怎么以最优（安全且高效）的方式从 A 点到达 B 点，那你应该去读 Steven M. Lavalle 的《Planning Algorithms》http://lavalle.pl/planning/，看看数学家们为了解决这个问题都想出了哪些绝妙招数。在机器人以外的领域也有很多很酷的应用，比如计算机图形学/动画……
…math literacy before diving into them. Speaking of navigation, if you're interested in motion planning i.e. how to optimally (safely and efficiently) go from point A to point B, what you read is Planning Algorithms by Steven M. Lavalle http://lavalle.pl/planning/ for various ways the math people have came up with to solve this. Many cool applications in fields outside of robotics like in Computer Graphics/Animation…
看起来是 Steven Lavalle 写的《Planning Algorithms》（免费）那本书的一个很有意思的补充：http://planning.cs.uiuc.edu/
Seems like an interesting complement to the (free) book on planning algorithms by Steven Lavalle: http://planning.cs.uiuc.edu/
……领域。工程学也没什么两样。Thrun 靠出版《概率机器人》（Probabilistic Robotics）赚钱，同时又发表同题材的学术论文，你会对他感到生气吗？我反正不会。虽然 LaValle 的《Planning Algorithms》是免费发布的，而且可以说是取得了更大的影响力，但在大多数学术出版界，那种模式并不代表主流。
…fields. Engineering is no different. Would you be mad at Thrun for publishing and profiting from Probablistic Robotics while publishing academic papers on the same subject? I wasn't. Though le valle's "Planning Algorithms" was released free and has arguably done better, that model is not the state of the art in most academic publishing.