毁灭的代价
The Wages of Destruction
J. Adam Tooze · 初版 2006 年
18人推荐
24位读者提及
38次提及
为什么值得读
- 详尽剖析经济与资源困境如何驱动德国开辟东线
- 打破传统军事史视角，展示经济因素的决定性
- 是近来极具权威性且独具视角的纳粹经济史著作
The Wages of Destruction 是一部详述纳粹德国经济史的非虚构书籍。该书由 Adam Tooze 撰写，于2006年由 Allen Lane 首次出版。The Wages of Destruction 荣获 Wolfson History Prize 以及2007年度 Longman/History Today Book of the Year Prize。该书出版后赢得了包括 Michael Burleigh、Richard Overy 和 Niall Ferguson 等作家的广泛赞誉。在书中，Tooze 指出，在德军于1940年未能击败英国之后，战争的经济逻辑促使他们入侵苏联。希特勒在1941年被迫如此行事以
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
……背后的始作俑者被贴上了左翼或右翼（甚至同时被贴上两种标签）的标签，并被称为普京的盟友。我本以为图兹也会写写这个，毕竟让他一举成名的那本书《毁灭的代价》[2]（我强烈推荐，我刚读完）就大篇幅探讨了纳粹对能源资源的追逐。这一回，欧洲自己决定切断与上述能源资源的联系……
…behind it is labeled as a left-winger or right-winger (or both at the same time), and called an ally of Putin. I had expected Tooze to also write about it, after all the book that made him famous, The Wages of Destruction [2] (which I heartily recommend, I've just finished reading it), touched heavily on the Nazis' quest for energy resources. This time around Europe decided to cut itself off from said energy resources…
……关于美国军用飞机产量的最佳估计，大概在全年各类飞机共计100,000架左右。另外，我在这里强烈推荐两本书：第一本：亚当·图兹的《毁灭的代价：纳粹经济的建立与崩溃》；第二本（一本真正独树一帜的书，它审视了这场世界上规模最大的战争，视角完全聚焦于交战国不同地区的人们……
…that the best estimates of U.S military aircraft production were somewhere in the neighborhood of 100,000 planes of all types for the year. Also, I strongly recommend a couple books here: First: "The Wages of Destruction: The Making and Breaking of the Nazi Economy" by Adam Tooze Second (truly a unique book that looks at the world's biggest war with a focus entirely on how people in different parts of the fighting countries…
……这一点，而且我隐约记得他的书有不少毛病，而且基根那本书的范围是不是太泛泛了？我目前的资料来源是纳粹德国相对较新的一部经济史著作，亚当·图兹的《毁灭的代价》（http://www.amazon.com/The-Wages-Destruction-Breaking-Economy...）。写得非常棒，展示了经济因素从始至终是何等至关重要。比如，其动机的一部分在于……
…this, and I seem to remember his book has more than a few problems, and isn't Keegan's book rather general in its scope? My current source is the relatively new economic history of Nazi Germany, The Wages of Destruction by Adam Tooze (http://www.amazon.com/The-Wages-Destruction-Breaking-Economy...). It's very good, and shows how economics were vitally important from beginning to end. E.g. part of the motivation in…
……当时的情况就是那样，例如被切断了英国煤炭供应直接导致了对苏联的入侵（咱们冬天去打俄国抢他们的粮食吧，能出什么岔子呢？如果你心理承受力够强，详见《毁灭的代价：纳粹经济的建立与崩溃》，https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0670038261/ 还没读完，而且书被龙卷风毁坏后也还没（重新）补买））。……
…well as it was, and e.g. being cut off from British coal directly led to the invasion of the Soviet Union (let's invade Russia during the winter to take their food, what could possibly go wrong?; see The Wages of Destruction: The Making and Breaking of the Nazi Economy for the detail, if you can stomach them https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0670038261/ Not finished, and not (yet) replaced after it was damaged by a tornado)).…
关于界定德国二战战争路径的物资和能源限制——包括它为何会不顾后果地开辟东线战场——迄今为止最好的一本书毫无疑问是亚当·图兹的《毁灭的代价》。https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wages_of_Destruction
Far and away the best book on the material and energy constraints that defined Germany's warpath in WW2 - including why it recklessly struck out to open the eastern front - is Adam Tooze's Wages of Destruction. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wages_of_Destruction
只要处于战争状态，经济在弹尽粮绝的状态下硬撑很长很长时间也是完全可能的。看看德国吧，在整个二战期间，他们简直就是在资源枯竭的情况下生生运转着国家，像亚当·图兹的《毁灭的代价》这类书对这一点有非常详尽的探讨。最后几年里流传着一句俗话，“好好享受战争吧，因为和平将会是可怕的”，事实也确实如此，因为一旦解开战时的止血带，所有的毒素就会瞬间涌出……
It's also possible to run an economy on empty for a long, long time provided there's a war on. Look at Germany, who literally ran the country on empty throughout all of WWII, books like Adam Tooze's "Wages of Destruction" cover this in great detail. There was a saying in the last few years, "enjoy the war, the peace will be terrible", and it was, because once you took the wartime tourniquet off all the toxins flooded…