致命的自负
The Fatal Conceit
Friedrich A. von Hayek · 初版 1988 年
5人推荐
24位读者提及
34次提及
为什么值得读
- 批判人类试图全盘设计经济与社会的自负
- 从经济学视角集中剖析社会主义的可行性
- 论述比其早期著作更精练且通俗易懂
F.A. Hayek 对社会主义的核心问题进行了根本性的审视与批判。他的分析始于 David Hume 的洞见——“道德规则……并非我们理性的结论”。“社会主义是一个错误吗？”他提出了这样的疑问，并借助演化认识论、道德传统以及当代伦理思潮的研究来探寻答案。他论证指出，社会主义从其源头上看，在科学、事实乃至逻辑层面上都是错误的——其屡次失败正是这些科学错误的直接结果。本书通俗易懂且极具争……
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
……靠情绪煽动、指望世界顺着我们的价值观来运转，这种治理方式在现实世界里根本行不通，现实只会按既定规律发展。更直白地说，去读读 Friedrich Hayek 的《致命的自负》（The Fatal Conceit）吧，书里探讨了自以为能随心所欲改造世界、且觉得这种世界还能维系下去的盲目狂妄。
…Governing by emotional appeals to the way our values tell us the world should behave is not a recipe for success in a world that behaves as the chips fall. More to the point, read Friedrich Hayek's The Fatal Conceit for a discussion of the hubris of believing that we can engineer a world to our liking, and that this world be at all sustainable.
……市场带来的结果优于政府试图操纵经济的结果。Frederick Hayek 把那种自以为能看破市场并将其引导向理想结果的盲目自信称为“致命的自负”，专门有一本神作讲这个。这也解释了为什么 Ron Paul（同样是奥派）一有机会就追着美联储猛轰，尤其是在加息这类事情上。另一个方面……
…markets lead to better outcomes than when governments try to manage economies. Frederick Hayek labelled the confidence of being able to second guess the market and manage it towards a desirable outcome "the fatal conceit" and there's a great book about it. Hence the way that Ron Paul (also an Austrian) gets stuck into the federal reserve at each opportunity, particularly over stuff like rate rises. The other aspect,…
……从哲学层面来看，我觉得它们并没有像《自由选择》（Free to Choose）那样直面人性中在社会主义经济下被证明十分棘手的特质。最后，另一本经典著作是 F. A. Hayek 的《致命的自负》，它从经济学角度更具针对性地考量了社会主义的可行性。和前面提到的书一样，它读起来通俗易懂。这些书可能并不代表前沿……
…like from a philosophical perspective, I feel they don't address the aspects of human nature that have proven troublesome in socialist economies as well as Free to Choose. Finally another classic, The Fatal Conceit by F. A. Hayek considers the practicality of socialism from an economic position in a more focused way. Like the previously mentioned books, it is an easy read. These books may not reflect cutting edge…
……从而得出结论：必须建立一个更加独裁的社会才能换来某种结果，而这结果本身可能根本无法实现，甚至会导致比另一种选择更糟糕的结局。[1] 如果你想审视并挑战自己潜意识里世界观立足的那些预设，我强烈推荐 Hayek 的《致命的自负》。
…conclude that a much more dictatorial society is necessary to produce a result that may itself not be possible and instead lead to an even worse result than the alternative. [1] I highly recommend The Fatal Conceit by Hayek if you want to challenge assumptions your own worldview likely rests on without even knowing it.
……David Friedman 的《Hidden Order: The Economics of Everyday Life》啃起来稍微费劲点。前面有几位评论者推荐了 Hayek 的《通往奴役之路》（Road to Serfdom，注：原文误作 Road to Freedom），但我认为他的最后一本书《致命的自负》讲的差不多是同样的内容，而且读起来更轻松。Howard Baetjer, Jr 的《Software As Capital》很有趣，不过我希望他在书里讨论一下开源，因为他的分析与大部分……
…"Hidden Order: The Economics of Everyday Life" by David Friedman requires a little more work. Several previous commentors have recommended Hayek's "Road to Freedom", but I think his last book, "The Fatal Conceit" covers more or less the same ground and is easier to read. "Software As Capital" by Howard Baetjer, Jr is interesting, but I wish he had discussed open source in it, since his analysis contradicts most…
如果你足够幸运，一生中会遇到那么几本彻底颠覆你世界观的书。对我来说，《致命的自负》就是其中之一。Hayek 极其出色地展示了人类社会（包括市场）是如何像自然界一样进化的。征服者将自己的文化强加给被征服者，但他们自己也无法免于……
If you're lucky, you find a few books over the course of your life that completely change the way you look at the world. For me, The Fatal Conceit was one of those books. Hayek does a great job of showing how society, including its markets, evolve just like nature does. Victors impose their culture on the vanquished, but themselves aren't immune…