Bill Joy 的文章《Why the Future Doesn't Need Us》[1] 很值得一读，非常适合那些正在琢磨未来这样的社会会变成什么样、对我们人类又意味着什么的人。我觉得归根结底还是那个哲学问题：人类存在的意义到底是什么。[1] http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/8.04/joy.html
Bill Joy's essay "Why the Future Doesn't Need Us" [1] is a good read for anyone working through what such a society would be like and what it means for our race. I think it comes down to the philosophical question of what man's purpose is. [1] http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/8.04/joy.html
这一领域只是 Bill Joy 在 http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/8.04/joy_pr.html 《Why the Future Doesn't Need Us》中探讨的其中一部分，在涵盖这类观点的文章里，这是我最喜欢的一篇。
This area is just one that Bill Joy covers in http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/8.04/joy_pr.html Why the Future Doesn't Need Us, which is my favorite essay on lots of these ideas.
我同意这确实值得深思。另见（Sun 联合创始人兼 vi 作者）Bill Joy 的文章《Why the Future doesn't need us》，里面探讨了这些问题。https://www.wired.com/2000/04/joy-2/
I agree that this is worth pondering. Also see (Sun co-founder and vi author) Bill Joy's essay Why the Future doesn't need us, which deals with these matters. https://www.wired.com/2000/04/joy-2/
……消遣。至于理由（2），现代科技是世界上发生过的最糟糕的事，推动它的进步简直就是犯罪。去读读 Martin Rees 写的《Our Final Century》；或者读读 Bill Joy 发表在《连线》杂志 2000 年 4 月刊上的文章《Why the Future Doesn’t Need Us》。至于理由（3），把数学当成职业会非常冒险。不久前我收到了一封来自一块墓碑的信……
…pastime. As for reason (2), modern technology is the worst thing that ever happened to the world, and to promote its progress is nothing short of criminal. Read Our Final Century, by Martin Rees; or read “Why the Future Doesn’t Need Us,” an article by Bill Joy that appeared in Wired magazine, April, 2000. As for reason (3), to choose mathematics as one’s career would be very risky. Not long ago I received a letter from a gravestone…
Bill Joy 的文章《Why the Future Doesn't Need Us》[1] 很值得一读，非常适合那些正在琢磨未来这样的社会会变成什么样、对我们人类又意味着什么的人。我觉得归根结底还是那个哲学问题：人类存在的意义到底是什么。[1] http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/8.04/joy.html
Bill Joy's essay "Why the Future Doesn't Need Us" [1] is a good read for anyone working through what such a society would be like and what it means for our race. I think it comes down to the philosophical question of what man's purpose is. [1] http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/8.04/joy.html
这一领域只是 Bill Joy 在 http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/8.04/joy_pr.html 《Why the Future Doesn't Need Us》中探讨的其中一部分，在涵盖这类观点的文章里，这是我最喜欢的一篇。
This area is just one that Bill Joy covers in http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/8.04/joy_pr.html Why the Future Doesn't Need Us, which is my favorite essay on lots of these ideas.
非常棒的分析。让我想起了一篇更新版的《Why the Future Doesn't Need Us》（作者是 Bill Joy）。
Great analysis. Reminds me of an updated, "Why the Future Doesn't Need Us", by Bill Joy.
我同意这确实值得深思。另见（Sun 联合创始人兼 vi 作者）Bill Joy 的文章《Why the Future doesn't need us》，里面探讨了这些问题。https://www.wired.com/2000/04/joy-2/
I agree that this is worth pondering. Also see (Sun co-founder and vi author) Bill Joy's essay Why the Future doesn't need us, which deals with these matters. https://www.wired.com/2000/04/joy-2/
……消遣。至于理由（2），现代科技是世界上发生过的最糟糕的事，推动它的进步简直就是犯罪。去读读 Martin Rees 写的《Our Final Century》；或者读读 Bill Joy 发表在《连线》杂志 2000 年 4 月刊上的文章《Why the Future Doesn’t Need Us》。至于理由（3），把数学当成职业会非常冒险。不久前我收到了一封来自一块墓碑的信……
…pastime. As for reason (2), modern technology is the worst thing that ever happened to the world, and to promote its progress is nothing short of criminal. Read Our Final Century, by Martin Rees; or read “Why the Future Doesn’t Need Us,” an article by Bill Joy that appeared in Wired magazine, April, 2000. As for reason (3), to choose mathematics as one’s career would be very risky. Not long ago I received a letter from a gravestone…
我觉得 Bill Joy 的《Why the future doesn't need us》要更有说服力得多。
I found Bill Joy's, “Why the future doesn't need us,” much more convincing.