《儿童的世纪》封面

儿童的世纪

Centuries of Childhood

Philippe Ariès · 初版 1962 年

4位读者提及
4次提及

Hacker News 上怎么说

  • 1. 某种程度上说,这仍然是一个未有定论的争论(我主要是通过菲利普·阿利埃斯的《儿童的世纪》接触到这个话题的)。但我从来不信“童年是现代发明”这种说法。如果你真去读读那个时期的一手文献,就能非常清楚地看到父母其实一直在尽力保护自己的孩子,……

    1. This is an on-going debate to a certain degree (I mainly have encountered it via Phillipe Ariès's Centuries of Childhood). But I have never bought the argument that childhood is a modern invention. If you actually read primary sources from the period it is abundantly clear that parents sought to protect their children,…

  • 这已经不是我第一次听说这个了——菲利普·阿利埃斯(Philippe Ariès)的《儿童的世纪》(Centuries of Childhood)一书里就提到过文学作品中关于这种习俗的记载。如果我没记错的话(也可能记错了),书中提到这在某个时期很普遍,但在那之前或之后都不是。总的来说……

    It's not the first time I hear about this — i.e. the book "Centuries of Childhood" by Philippe Ariès writes a bit about mentions of this habit in literature. If I remember correctly (which I may not), it mentions it was common for some period, but neither before or after. In general…

  • “中世纪的人不在乎自己的孩子”确实是菲利普·阿利埃斯在《儿童的世纪》中提出的观点:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centuries_of_Childhood

    "People in the Middle Ages don't care about their children" was a real view argued by Phillip Aries in Centuries of Childhood: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centuries_of_Childhood

  • ……从很多层面来看这都很糟糕。在法律上认定儿童不具备劳动能力,并让他们在长达 20 年的“禁闭期”里忙于应付各种学业杂务,就解决了这个问题。老实交代:其实我从来没读过《儿童的世纪》(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centuries_of_Childhood )

    …that's bad on many levels. Marking kids as legally incapable of labor and putting them into a 20-year timeout as they engage in educational busywork solves this problem. Confession: never actually read Centuries of Childhood( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centuries_of_Childhood )

正在加载完整评论……

键盘快捷键

/
聚焦搜索框
j / k
下一本 / 上一本
Enter
打开选中的书
Esc
关闭 / 返回
g h
回到首页
g b
值得读精选
g t
历史总榜
g r
上升最快
g l
我的书架
?
显示本帮助