存在与时间
Sein und Zeit
Martin Heidegger · 初版 1927 年
2人推荐
9位读者提及
9次提及
“存在的意义是什么？”这是 Martin Heidegger 这部极其重要的著作的核心问题，这位伟大的哲学家在书中力图阐释存在的基本问题。该书对后世的哲学、文学、艺术和批评理论产生了深远影响——同时也是 existentialism 和许多后现代思想的重要源泉。
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
Sein und Zeit
Martin Heidegger · 初版 1927 年
“存在的意义是什么？”这是 Martin Heidegger 这部极其重要的著作的核心问题，这位伟大的哲学家在书中力图阐释存在的基本问题。该书对后世的哲学、文学、艺术和批评理论产生了深远影响——同时也是 existentialism 和许多后现代思想的重要源泉。
正在加载完整评论……
海德格尔：《存在与时间》（Sein und Zeit）https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/21477742-martin-heidegge...（英译版：https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/92307.Being_and_Time）。伟大的哲学作品，唉，可惜作者是个纳粹。但你没法挑……
Heidegger: Sein und Zeit https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/21477742-martin-heidegge... (translation: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/92307.Being_and_Time ). Great philosophy, and, alas, nazi author. But you can't choose…
……在他们中的某些人因为我们不说大白话。并不是每个人都是外行。吹捧所谓“人言”（man sagt / 大家都在说）完全是荒谬透顶的，海德格尔早就写过这点。建议你（重）读一下《存在与时间》（Sein und Zeit）里关于闲言（Gerede）、好奇（Neugier）与两可（Zweideutigkeit）的那几页（§35, §36, §37）。
…in some of them specific people because we do not speak demotic. Not everyone is a layman. Celebrating a "man sagt" is utterly absurd, and Heidegger wrote about it. I suggest you (re)read the pages in Sein und Zeit about Gerede, Neugier und Zweideutigkeit (§35, §36, §37).
……《存在与时间》（Being and Time）真的很好。我不同意（我从没读过他的翻译版本）。他在德语里造的词和晦涩冗长的句子可以说是出了名的。我曾把《存在与时间》（Sein und Zeit）里一句特别晦涩难懂的话写在白板上挂了一年多，每次有人进我办公室，这都会成为大家或调侃或严肃探讨的话题。
…of Being and Time is really good. I disagree (I've never tried reading him in translation). His German coinage and turgid sentences are legendary. I had one particularly obscurantist sentence from Sein und Zeit on my whiteboard for over a year and it was always a source of discussion, both jocular and serious, when someone came into my office.
……这些问题都不是根本问题，只有在你理解了自身“存在/此在”（Sein）的条件和结构之后，你才能去操心这些问题。《存在与时间》（Sein und Zeit）之所以是个残篇、一个半途而废的本体论解决方案，是有充分原因的。海德格尔自己也意识到了，尽管开局很乐观，但他的探究路径并没有解决本体论的整体问题。也许……
…none of these questions are primary questions, they are questions that you can only concern yourself with after you have understood the conditions and structures of your own Sein. There is a good reason Sein und Zeit is a fragment, an aborted solution for the problem of ontology. Heidegger himself notices that his line of enquiry does not solve the overall problem of ontology, despite his optimistic start. Perhaps…
……暂且也反对一下后现代主义。我认为欧陆哲学中晦涩文风的典型代表就是海德格尔，但同时我觉得大家并不会认为《存在与时间》（Sein und Zeit）是在胡言乱语。不过，许多分析哲学家（包括我自己）大概都会认同：《存在与时间》很可能也犯了那种把精神分析假设当作真理的毛病，而这正是存在主义的典型特征……
…against postmodernism for a moment, as well. I think the prototypical example of dense prose in continental philosophy would be Heidegger, but at the same time I don't think that people would say that Sein und Zeit is gibberish. Now, many analytic philosophers (including myself) would probably agree that Sein und Zeit probably falls to the same psychoanalytic-assumption-as-truth that is categorical of existentialism…
……它妨碍了目标的达成吗？这样一来，你就能避免浪费时间和精力。我在海德格尔那儿找到了不少好东西，但我认为不值得你费尽心力去硬啃原著。直接去查查《存在与时间》（Sein und Zeit）的 Cliff's Notes 导读就行了。那么我从这一切里得到了什么？- 我开始反思自己活着到底真正想要什么。- 我决定追求更多的独立和自由。- 我决定自己不喜欢那个方向……
…it hinder the goal? In this way, you can avoid wasting time and effort. I found good stuff in Heidegger, but I don't think it's worth your time to grind through it. Just look up the Cliff's Notes for 'Sein und Zeit.' So what did I get out of all that? -I started to question what it was I really wanted to get out of life. -I decided I wanted more independence and liberty. -I decided I didn't like the direction…