《句法结构》封面

句法结构

Syntactic structures

Noam Chomsky · 初版 1957 年

2人推荐
16位读者提及
19次提及

为什么值得读

  • 乔姆斯基提出句法理论的首部著作
  • 深入探讨语言接口与句法结构机制
  • 自然语言处理与计算语言学的基础读物

美国语言学家 Paul Postal 于1964年写道,当时“美国流行的大多数句法概念”都是“Chomsky 意义上的短语结构文法理论的各种版本”。英国语言学家 John Lyons 于1966年指出,“没有任何一部著作对当代语言学理论产生过比 Chomsky 的《Syntactic Structures》更大的影响。”著名语言学史学家 R. H. Robins 于1967年写道,Chomsky《Syntactic Structures》的出版“或许是描述语言学和语言学理论中发生的最激进、最重要的方向性变革

Hacker News 上怎么说

  • …http://swtch.com/~rsc/regexp/regexp1.html 以及自动机理论(Hopcroft) Practical Text Mining with Perl(Bilisoly) Natural Language Processing with Python(Bird) Computational Linguistics(Hausser) Syntactic structures(Chomsky) 另外也可以看看这些链接: http://measuringmeasures.blogspot.com/2010/01/learning-about... http://measuringmeasures.com/blog/2010/3/12/learning-about-m... http://www.cs.technion.ac.il/~gabr/resources/resources.html

    …http://swtch.com/~rsc/regexp/regexp1.html and automata theory (Hopcroft) Practical Text Mining with Perl (Bilisoly) Natural Language Processing with Python (Bird) Computational Linguistics (Hausser) Syntactic structures (Chomsky) also check out these links: http://measuringmeasures.blogspot.com/2010/01/learning-about... http://measuringmeasures.com/blog/2010/3/12/learning-about-m... http://www.cs.technion.ac.il/~gabr/resources/resources.html

  • …很有成果的一个。我还没读过这位研究者的整篇论文,但如果它没在开头引用 Chomsky,我会觉得挺遗憾(虽然也不至于震惊……)。除了你关于 interfaces 的具体观点——这方面我推荐去读读原版《句法结构》(Syntactic Structures)里更多的讨论——半个世纪以来,他一直在讲她现在说的这些东西。他这人太谦逊/讲究实证了,说话从来不带绝对的断言,但在我看来,从整体上看真相是很清楚的:…

    …productive one. I haven’t read this researchers full paper, but I would be sad (tho not shocked…) if it didn’t cite Chomsky up front. Beyond your specific point re:interfaces—which I recommend the OG Syntactic Structures for more commentary on—he’s been saying what she’s saying here for about half a century. He’s too humble/empirical to ever say it without qualifiers, but IMO the truth is clear when viewed holistically:…

  • 这其实并不是 Chomsky 在这个主题上的第一本书。第一本是《句法结构》(Syntactic Structures,1957 年)。

    This was actually not Chomsky's first book on this topic. That was Syntactic Structures (1957).

  • 搞笑的是,作者承认自己几乎不知道这句话的出处之后,还费尽心思写了这篇文章。Chomsky 在《句法结构》(Syntactic Structures)里引用它,是为了说明一个句子的合语法性并不能完全解释它在大型语料库中出现的概率。“Furiously sleep ideas green colorless”(愤怒地睡觉想法绿色无色)则是另一个低概率句子,…

    It's funny the author wasted energy composing this after admitting he barely knows the origin of the sentence. Chomsky invokes it in "Syntactic Structures" to illustrate that the grammaticality of a given sentence doesn't fully explain the odds of it appearing in a large corpus. "Furiously sleep ideas green colorless" is another low probability sentence,…

  • …只看给定单词相邻的词,根本不管任何结构。而在真正的人类语言中——任何人类语言——都存在层级结构。这一点自 1957 年起就为人所知了(Chomsky 的《句法结构》(Syntactic Structures),虽然我怀疑 context free 或 weakly context sensitive 模型就已经够用了)。有没有什么办法能强迫神经网络构建层级模型?而且当然,这些层级并不是…

    …adjacent to a given word, without paying attention to any structure. Whereas in real human languages--any human language--there is a hierarchical structure. This has been known since 1957 (Chomsky's Syntactic Structures, although I suspect that context free or weakly context sensitive models are sufficient). Is there a way to force a neural net to construct hierarchical models? And of course the hierarchies are not…

  • …体面的数学大道。到了晚上,他又踏上计算机编程和编译器编写这条未经铺砌的小路。两条道路交汇了!——这是 Knuth 在 1961 年度蜜月时读 Noam Chomsky 的《句法结构》(Syntactic Structures)时发现的。“Chomsky 的理论让我着迷,因为它们既很数学化,又能用我作为程序员的直觉来理解。这非常奇妙,因为换作别的情况,作为一名…

    …respectable lane of mathematics. During nighttime, he trod the unpaved road of computer programming and compiler writing. Both roads intersected! -- as Knuth discovered while reading Noam Chomsky's book Syntactic Structures on his honeymoon in 1961. "Chomsky theories fascinated me, because they were mathematical yet they could also be understood with my programmer's intuition. It was very curious because otherwise, as a…

正在加载完整评论……

键盘快捷键

/
聚焦搜索框
j / k
下一本 / 上一本
Enter
打开选中的书
Esc
关闭 / 返回
g h
回到首页
g b
值得读精选
g t
历史总榜
g r
上升最快
g l
我的书架
?
显示本帮助