反思性实践者
The Reflective Practitioner
Donald A. Schon · 初版 1991 年
4人推荐
5位读者提及
5次提及
一位顶尖的 M.I.T. 社会科学家兼顾问考察了工程、建筑、管理、心理治疗和城市规划五大专业领域，以揭示专业人员究竟是如何解决问题的。Donald Schön 坚称，最优秀的专业人士所知晓的远比他们能用言语表达出来的要多。面对工作中的挑战，他们依赖的并非在研究生阶段学到的公式，而是在实践中习得的那种即兴发挥。这种未曾被言说、很大程度上未经审视的过程正是 Schön 这本富有独创性的著作所探讨的主题，该书致力于精确展示行动中反思是如何起作用的……
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
……设计），其核心本质上不是 UX 或视觉设计，尽管两者兼而有之。Herbert Simon 的《The Sciences of the Artificial》是我在这一领域最喜欢的书，不过唐纳德·舍恩（Donald Schön）的《The Reflective Practitioner》也是一本好书，从更广义的“用原材料创造出可供人类使用的造物”这个角度谈了设计。
…design), which is as its core not primarily UX or visual design, though it has elements of both. Herb Simon's The Sciences of the Artificial is my favorite book in this area, though Donald Schön's The Reflective Practitioner is also a good book on design in this broader sense of producing human-usable artifacts out of materials.
第二点关系到对自身工作的反思，也就是 Reflective Practice。去读读 Donald Schon 的《The Reflective Practitioner》（或者哪怕扫一眼 Wiki 页面也行）。它讲的是如何跳出日常琐事本身，来提升自己的工作方式。
Item #2 relates to reflecting on your work, Reflective Practice. Give Donald Schon's book The Reflective Practitioner a read (or heck, the Wiki page). It deals with being able to rise above work and improve how you work.
……你提到的那些事情。从高层次来看，我认为对这门课影响最大的当属 Donald Schön 的研究。你可能想去读读他的著作——尤其是《The Reflective Practitioner》。> 一位有着 HCI 背景的 UX 设计师，困在一副暮气沉沉、毫无生气的老派科技公司里，拼了老命想让他们换个思路思考。我觉得这里面多半是人情世故和办公室政治的问题……
…the things you mentioned. From a high-level point of view, I believe the most important influence on the course was the work by Donald Schön. You might want to check out his writings - especially The Reflective Practitioner. > a UX designer with a background in HCI, trapped in an uninspired and aging tech company trying to get them to think differently or die trying. I think a lot of this is more political than anything…
我推荐读一下 Donald Schön 的《The Reflective Practitioner》。
I’d recommend to read the reflective practitioner, by Donald Schön
我也曾被《Reflective Practitioner》里一段类似的内容触动，几年前还写过一个推特 thread，探讨随着计算机的发展，专业领域的模糊性是如何加深的：https://twitter.com/thadk/status/1211175280498356226?s=21
I was also struck by a similar section of Reflective Practitioner and wrote this thread some years ago about how professional ambiguity is furthered as computers advance: https://twitter.com/thadk/status/1211175280498356226?s=21