返璞归真的基督教
Mere Christianity
C. S. Lewis · 初版 1952 年
29人推荐
52位读者提及
69次提及
为什么值得读
- 行文短小精炼极易阅读，逻辑推理严谨清晰
- 不带宗派偏见，专注于解释基督教的核心本质
- 摒弃繁琐教派争端，为信仰建立理性思想根基
起初作为非正式的广播“谈话”播出，后来分别出版为The Case for Christianity、Christian Behaviour以及Beyond Personality三本书，如今它们共同收录于Mere Christianity中。这位著名的基督教护教家以其直率晓畅的风格，展示了基督教的力量如何显现——不是在任何单一教派中，而是作为一种整体力量的“纯粹”基督教。因为Lewis旨在证明：“在各自的核心之中，都存在着某种事物或某位个体，能超越一切信仰分歧、一切性格差异、一切相互
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
C·S·刘易斯的《纯粹理性》（Mere Christianity）。他的任何非虚构作品都有一种我很难见到的写作风格。他极度推崇理性，讲究循序渐进。还有威廉·斯特伦克和 E·B·……合著的《风格的要素》（The Elements of Style）
Mere Christianity, by C. S. Lewis. Any of his nonfiction works have a style of writing that I seldom find. He has a dedication to reason and a step-by-step approach. The Elements of Style, by William Strunk and E. B.…
如果你想要读真正优质的神学作品，我推荐 C.S. 刘易斯的《纯粹理性》：http://www.amazon.com/Mere-Christianity-C-S-Lewis/dp/0060652... 我自己就是个基督徒，信了差不多快两年了。我从小基本是在一个非宗教背景的家庭长……
If you want really good theology I would recommend Mere Christianity by C.S. Lewis: http://www.amazon.com/Mere-Christianity-C-S-Lewis/dp/0060652... I'm a Christian myself and have been one for nearly two two years. I came from a more or less non-religious background growing…
……得出结论：基督降世不是为了让人心生恐惧（或定罪）于世界，而是为了拯救世界（约翰福音 3:17）。如果你真的好奇，去看看鲍勃·乔治（Bob George）的《经典基督教》（Classic Christianity），或者 C.S. 刘易斯的《纯粹理性》后半部分。两本书都摒弃了作为许多基督教派系根基的那些无用废话，直击基督教和圣经真正含义的核心。
…conclude that Christ didn't come to instill fear (or condemn) the world, but to save the world (John 3:17). If you're really curious, check out "Classic Christianity" by Bob George or the latter parts of "Mere Christianity" by CS Lewis. Both books do away with the needless junk that is the basis for many sects of Christianity and get to the core of what Christianity and the Bible really means.
C.S. 刘易斯的《纯粹理性》。十几岁时，它为我的信仰提供了理智基础，让我明白这是完全站得住脚的。还有斯蒂芬·迈耶（Stephen Meyer）的《达尔文的疑惑》（Darwin's Doubt）。如果上帝存在，方法论自然主义就不可能完全……
Mere Christianity by CS Lewis. As a teenager it gave me an intellectual basis for my faith and helped me see it could be defensible. Darwin's Doubt by Stephen Meyer. If God exists methodological naturalism can't be completely…
……在这方面。虽然我怀疑自己能不能改变你的想法，但我希望你能重新考虑一下，至少去了解一下你在这里批评的到底是什么。关于这个话题有一本非常好的书，就是 C.S. 刘易斯的《纯粹理性》。它篇幅很短，写得极好，所以读起来很快。它在阐释基督徒到底相信什么方面做得极其出色——据我所察，没有任何宗派偏见……
…in this respect. Although I doubt I can change your mind on this, I hope you'd reconsider at least learning about what it is that you're criticizing here. A very good book on the topic is C.S. Lewis' "Mere Christianity". It is quite short, extremely well written and therefore can be read quite fast. It does a wonderful job of explaining -- with no denominational bias that I can detect -- what it is that Christians believe…
……虽然有些人可能会选择更有爱心和同情心，而另一些人可能不会——但一种是好的、另一种是坏的这种观念，是跨越文化和历史界限的。更多内容请看《纯粹理性》：http://www.amazon.com/Mere-Christianity-C-S-Lewis/dp/0060652... 关于这本书：你可以用亚马逊的“Look Inside”预览功能去读第一章（人性的法则），正好涵盖了这个问……
…While some might choose to be more loving and compassionate, and other might choose not to -- the sense of one being good, and other being bad is crosses cultural and historic boundaries. For more see Mere Christianity: http://www.amazon.com/Mere-Christianity-C-S-Lewis/dp/0060652... Regarding the book: you can use Amazon's "Look Inside" feature to read the first chapter (The Law of Human Nature), which covers the question…