阿奎那论心灵
Aquinas on mind
Anthony Kenny · 初版 1993 年
2位读者提及
2次提及
Aquinas的成熟期著作尽管在主旨上是神学性的，但在不依附于特定基督教信仰的层面上，包含了丰富的哲学内容。从16世纪到19世纪，由于源自Descartes的观念占据主导地位，除了一两例例外，世俗思想家并不重视他的哲学心理学或philosophy of mind。而在本世纪，许多哲学家已经认为笛卡尔体系完全破产，如今人们可以发现，Aquinas的philosophy of mind具有巨大的当代
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
……这一指责竟然出自罗素之口，委实令人称奇，毕竟他在《Principia Mathematica》（数学原理）里花了几百页来证明二加二等于四，而这明明是他一辈子都深信不疑的事情”（见《Aquinas on Mind》第 11 页）。在这段引言中，罗素也严重误解了托马斯的研究宗旨。据我所知，托马斯从未声称自己是在做哲学（至少按现代对哲学的理解来看不是）；……
…extraordinary that that accusation should be made by Russell, who in the book Principia Mathematica takes hundreds of pages to prove that two and two make four, which is something he had believed all his life” (Aquinas on Mind, 11). Russell also misunderstands much of Thomas’s project in this quotation. To my knowledge, Thomas never claimed to be doing philosophy (at least not according to the modern understanding of it);…
> 托马斯从未声称自己是在做哲学？“《Summa Contra Gentiles》本就是一部哲学著作”——Anthony Kenny（《Aquinas on Mind》，第 13 页）http://people.exeter.ac.uk/sp344/Aquinas%20on%20Mind.pdf
> Thomas never claimed to be doing philosophy ? "The Summa Contra Gentiles is meant as a philosophical work" Anthony Kenny (Aquinas on Mind, 13) http://people.exeter.ac.uk/sp344/Aquinas%20on%20Mind.pdf