…advocates for the proper appreciation of the work that Marcus produced, and yet he doesn't agree with Smith. But really, this is all probably secondary to the issues surrounding Kripke's importance. Naming and Necessity - like most paradigm shifting works - was not a one-trick pony. Kripke expanded on his possible world semantics, introduced distinctions like metaphysical vs epistemic necessity, laid waste to any residual…
……http://www.philosophybites.com/ 去看看斯坦福哲学百科全书（SEP）吧，完全免费，几乎每个重要话题和人物都有在职哲学学者编辑更新。http://plato.stanford.edu/ 克里普克的《命名与必然性》是关于指称和因果指称论的，但它预设了相当多的背景知识（如果你专门问的就是这个的话）。牛津通识读本（Very Short Introductions）系列也有几本非常……
…http://www.philosophybites.com/ Check out Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, which is free and edited by active research philosophers on pretty much every major topic and figure. http://plato.stanford.edu/ Naming and Necessity by Kripke is about reference and the causal theory of reference, but it assume a decent amount (in case that is what you were asking for specifically). The Very Short Introductions series have some really…
…Reality (Barry Stroud) Languages of Art (Nelson Goodman) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Thomas Kuhn) Concepts (Jerry Fodor) The Web of Life (Fritjof Capra) Foucault's Pendulum (Umberto Eco) Naming and Necessity (Saul Kripke) Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance (Robert Pirsig) There are others, and a lot of essays (by thinkers like Bertrand Russell, Carl Hempel, Hilary Putnam, WVO Quine, Karl Popper,…
…with a guy who had a PhD in philosophy and had studied Kripke closely. He was working in software at the time because it’s hard to make a living as a philosopher. He gave me one of his extra copies of Naming and Necessity. I had never read any philosophy and I was amazed. Kripke was truly a brilliant philosopher.
…understand any bit of the book, you need to understand how it fits into the wider contest of the book. This 'hermeneutic cycle' is daunting, but the only thing you can do is jump on board. 3. Saul Kripke - Naming and Necessity Kripke's book is on a slightly strange topic: how we use names. But how he deals with this is an interesting problem is a model of clarity and philosophical excellence. It has also been very influential…
Naming and Necessity, by Saul A. Kripke It's a series of Kripke's lectures from 1970 if I'm not mistaken, republished, but without significant changes/corrections. Note Kripke's age of 29 at that point. In them, he develops…
……主张对马库斯的研究成果给予应有的认可，但他又不同意史密斯的观点。不过讲真，比起克里普克的重要性问题，这些大概都只能算次要的了。《命名与必然性》——就像大多数带来范式转变的巨作一样——绝非一招鲜。克里普克拓展了他的可能世界语义学，引入了形而上学必然性与认识论必然性之间的区分，彻底扫清了任何残留的……
…advocates for the proper appreciation of the work that Marcus produced, and yet he doesn't agree with Smith. But really, this is all probably secondary to the issues surrounding Kripke's importance. Naming and Necessity - like most paradigm shifting works - was not a one-trick pony. Kripke expanded on his possible world semantics, introduced distinctions like metaphysical vs epistemic necessity, laid waste to any residual…
……http://www.philosophybites.com/ 去看看斯坦福哲学百科全书（SEP）吧，完全免费，几乎每个重要话题和人物都有在职哲学学者编辑更新。http://plato.stanford.edu/ 克里普克的《命名与必然性》是关于指称和因果指称论的，但它预设了相当多的背景知识（如果你专门问的就是这个的话）。牛津通识读本（Very Short Introductions）系列也有几本非常……
…http://www.philosophybites.com/ Check out Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, which is free and edited by active research philosophers on pretty much every major topic and figure. http://plato.stanford.edu/ Naming and Necessity by Kripke is about reference and the causal theory of reference, but it assume a decent amount (in case that is what you were asking for specifically). The Very Short Introductions series have some really…
……《现实》（巴里·斯特劳德）、《艺术的语言》（纳尔逊·古德曼）、《科学革命的结构》（托马斯·库恩）、《概念》（杰瑞·福多）、《生命的网织》（弗里秋夫·卡普拉）、《福科摆》（翁贝托·埃科）、《命名与必然性》（索尔·克里普克）、《禅与摩托车维修艺术》（罗伯特·皮尔西格）。还有其他的，以及大量论文（来自伯特兰·罗素、卡尔·亨佩尔、希拉里·普特南、W·V·O·蒯因、卡尔·波普尔等思想家……
…Reality (Barry Stroud) Languages of Art (Nelson Goodman) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Thomas Kuhn) Concepts (Jerry Fodor) The Web of Life (Fritjof Capra) Foucault's Pendulum (Umberto Eco) Naming and Necessity (Saul Kripke) Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance (Robert Pirsig) There are others, and a lot of essays (by thinkers like Bertrand Russell, Carl Hempel, Hilary Putnam, WVO Quine, Karl Popper,…
……跟一个哲学博士共事过，他深入研究过克里普克。因为靠哲学谋生太难，他当时在干软件开发。他把他多出来的一本《命名与必然性》送给了我。我以前从没读过任何哲学书，结果彻底被震撼了。克里普克真是一位才华横溢的哲学家。
…with a guy who had a PhD in philosophy and had studied Kripke closely. He was working in software at the time because it’s hard to make a living as a philosopher. He gave me one of his extra copies of Naming and Necessity. I had never read any philosophy and I was amazed. Kripke was truly a brilliant philosopher.
……想要看懂书里的任何一点，你都得理解它在全书更广阔的语境中是如何自洽的。这种“解释学循环”让人望而生畏，但你唯一的办法就是硬着头皮跳进去。3. 索尔·克里普克 - 《命名与必然性》。克里普克这本书的主题略显奇怪：我们是如何使用名字的。但他处理这个有趣问题的方式，堪称清晰明了与卓越哲学思维的典范。它也产生了极其深远的影响……
…understand any bit of the book, you need to understand how it fits into the wider contest of the book. This 'hermeneutic cycle' is daunting, but the only thing you can do is jump on board. 3. Saul Kripke - Naming and Necessity Kripke's book is on a slightly strange topic: how we use names. But how he deals with this is an interesting problem is a model of clarity and philosophical excellence. It has also been very influential…
索尔·A·克里普克的《命名与必然性》。没记错的话，这是他 1970 年的一系列讲座结集再版的，几乎没有做实质性的修改或更正。注意，克里普克当时才 29 岁。在这些讲座中，他提出了……
Naming and Necessity, by Saul A. Kripke It's a series of Kripke's lectures from 1970 if I'm not mistaken, republished, but without significant changes/corrections. Note Kripke's age of 29 at that point. In them, he develops…