无神论的妄想
Atheist delusions
David Bentley Hart · 初版 2009 年
3人推荐
4位读者提及
4次提及
如今，“虔诚地不虔诚”成了一种风尚。宗教最激烈的反对者——Christopher Hitchens、Richard Dawkins、Daniel Dennett、Sam Harris 等人——让出版商竞相出版并推销他们对宗教、一神论、Christianity 和 Roman Catholicism 的各种抨击。然而，当代反宗教论辩不仅建立在深刻的概念混淆之上，还基于对历史的轻率简化，甚至是彻底的历史无知：David Bentley Hart 在这部大胆纠偏之作中如是主张。作为最杰出的学者之一，
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
……狠狠打脸了诸如此类句子的论调。还有那种认为现代人在宽容和理性方面在某种程度上优于前人的观点。事实完全不是这么回事。[1] http://www.amazon.com/Atheist-Delusions-Christian-Revolution...
…that shames to ground sentences like this. Also the idea that modernity is somehow superior to previous ages in regard to tolerance and reason. Nothing further from the truth. [1] http://www.amazon.com/Atheist-Delusions-Christian-Revolution...
我推荐戴维·本特利·哈特的《无神论的妄念》（Atheist Delusions），看看为什么你的唯物主义信念可能并不那么站得住脚。
I recommend "Atheist Delusions" by David Bentley Hart for reasons that your materialist beliefs might not be so well founded.
如果你对宗教感兴趣，但想跳出“新无神论者”的套路，我建议找一本像《Refuting the New Atheists》或《Atheist Delusions》（无神论的妄念）这样的书看看。你不需要信教也能看出，希钦斯/道金斯那套方法极其肤浅，搞宗教学研究的学者基本没谁当真。他们写的绝大多数不过是论战檄文……
If you're interested in religion but want to go beyond the New Atheists, I recommend picking up a book like Refuting the New Atheists or Atheist Delusions. You don't need to be a religious person to realize that the Hitchens/Dawkins approach is an extremely shallow one that basically no scholar of religion takes seriously. They are mostly just polemics…
……戴维·本特利·哈特指出了唯物主义论点的种种谬误：https://www.amazon.com/Experience-God-Being-Consciousness-Bl... 这本我还没读过，但看起来很切中要害：https://www.amazon.com/Atheist-Delusions-Christian-Revolutio... 说明一下，哈特自己的宗教观点其实相当兼容并蓄，他并没有其书评和营销宣传里包装的那么教条化地偏向基督教。
…David Bentley Hart addresses the fallacies of materialist arguments: https://www.amazon.com/Experience-God-Being-Consciousness-Bl... I haven't read this one, but seems on point: https://www.amazon.com/Atheist-Delusions-Christian-Revolutio... To be clear, Hart's own religious views seem pretty eclectic, and he is much less dogmatically Christian than blurbs and marketing of his books suggest.