《The Areas of My Expertise》- John Hodgeman。让我彻底爱上了这种形式，它比起书本身更像是一场 7 小时的单口喜剧专场。还有 Paul Rudd 参演。
The Areas of My Expertise - John Hodgeman. Sold me on the format and is more like a 7 hour stand-up comedy special than a book per se. Also features Paul Rudd.
在他的一部自传作品中，John Hodgman 反思了他的那些无厘头恶搞书（《The Areas of my Expertise》）是如何出人意料地在 12 岁小孩中大受欢迎的，而这种受欢迎程度正是那些书及其续作取得成功的首要原因。
In one of his auto biographical boom John Hodgman reflects how his nonsense books ("The Areas of my Expertise") were unexpectedly wildly popular among 12 year olds, and this popularity was the primary reason those books and their sequels we're successful.
…LLM 生成的文本伪装成人类，所以我很好奇你觉得哪种更糟：1. LLM 准确反映 prompt/input 生成的文本，还是 2. 渴望被严肃对待的纯人类废话？（例如：如果不是为了开玩笑而写的 John Hodgman 的《The Areas of My Expertise》）我个人更倾向 1，因为我好歹还能从中刺探到点知识。
…masquerading of LLM text as human, so I'm curious what you'd consider worse: 1. LLM-generated text reflecting an accurate prompt/input, or 2. genuine human BS wanting to be taken seriously? (e.g. The Areas of My Expertise by John Hodgman if it wasn't in jest) Personally, I prefer #1 since I can still learn something from it.
…LLM 生成的文本伪装成人类，所以我很好奇你觉得哪种更糟：1. LLM 准确反映 prompt/input 生成的文本，还是 2. 渴望被严肃对待的纯人类废话？（例如：如果不是为了开玩笑而写的 John Hodgman 的《The Areas of My Expertise》）第 1 种更糟（如果未经编辑/事实核查/润色等，直接未经处理倒出来的话），因为数量会极其庞大，而且虚实交织会让…
…masquerading of LLM text as human, so I'm curious what you'd consider worse: 1. LLM-generated text reflecting an accurate prompt/input, or 2. genuine human BS wanting to be taken seriously? (e.g. The Areas of My Expertise by John Hodgman if it wasn't in jest) #1 is worse (if unedited/factchecked/improved etc and just dumped out raw), because there will be much more of it and the intermingling of fact and fiction makes…
《The Areas of My Expertise》- John Hodgeman。让我彻底爱上了这种形式，它比起书本身更像是一场 7 小时的单口喜剧专场。还有 Paul Rudd 参演。
The Areas of My Expertise - John Hodgeman. Sold me on the format and is more like a 7 hour stand-up comedy special than a book per se. Also features Paul Rudd.
在他的一部自传作品中，John Hodgman 反思了他的那些无厘头恶搞书（《The Areas of my Expertise》）是如何出人意料地在 12 岁小孩中大受欢迎的，而这种受欢迎程度正是那些书及其续作取得成功的首要原因。
In one of his auto biographical boom John Hodgman reflects how his nonsense books ("The Areas of my Expertise") were unexpectedly wildly popular among 12 year olds, and this popularity was the primary reason those books and their sequels we're successful.
…LLM 生成的文本伪装成人类，所以我很好奇你觉得哪种更糟：1. LLM 准确反映 prompt/input 生成的文本，还是 2. 渴望被严肃对待的纯人类废话？（例如：如果不是为了开玩笑而写的 John Hodgman 的《The Areas of My Expertise》）我个人更倾向 1，因为我好歹还能从中刺探到点知识。
…masquerading of LLM text as human, so I'm curious what you'd consider worse: 1. LLM-generated text reflecting an accurate prompt/input, or 2. genuine human BS wanting to be taken seriously? (e.g. The Areas of My Expertise by John Hodgman if it wasn't in jest) Personally, I prefer #1 since I can still learn something from it.
…LLM 生成的文本伪装成人类，所以我很好奇你觉得哪种更糟：1. LLM 准确反映 prompt/input 生成的文本，还是 2. 渴望被严肃对待的纯人类废话？（例如：如果不是为了开玩笑而写的 John Hodgman 的《The Areas of My Expertise》）第 1 种更糟（如果未经编辑/事实核查/润色等，直接未经处理倒出来的话），因为数量会极其庞大，而且虚实交织会让…
…masquerading of LLM text as human, so I'm curious what you'd consider worse: 1. LLM-generated text reflecting an accurate prompt/input, or 2. genuine human BS wanting to be taken seriously? (e.g. The Areas of My Expertise by John Hodgman if it wasn't in jest) #1 is worse (if unedited/factchecked/improved etc and just dumped out raw), because there will be much more of it and the intermingling of fact and fiction makes…