…understand the life and history of each author. Context is extremely important. Don't let modern sensibilities fill the gaps. If you're looking for a solid introduction to traditional logic, I recommend you Socratic Logic, by Peter Kreeft. Lastly, the only way to truly understand Stoicism is to learn about Socrates and Plato as well.
彼得·克里夫特的《苏格拉底逻辑》。《1861–1865年南北战争史》（A History of the Civil War, 1861–1865）是詹姆斯·福特·罗兹在1918年写的一本书。这是我读过用通俗英文写作的最优秀典范之一。教你如何把观点清晰表达出来……
Socratic Logic by Peter Kreeft. A History of the Civil War, 1861–1865 is a book by James Ford Rhodes written in 1918. It is one of finest examples of plain English writing I have read. How to get your point across…
……以及现代符号逻辑。关于这一点可以查查亨利·B·维奇（Henry B. Veatch）这位作者（如果你能淘到他便宜的二手书的话）。目前仍在出版的传统逻辑学主要教材是彼得·克里夫特的《苏格拉底逻辑》。但要注意，他对符号逻辑持极其尖锐的批评态度。了解其中涉及的问题是有好处的，尤其是实质蕴涵怪论（paradoxes of material implication）。当年符号逻辑……
…as modern symbolic logic. Henry B. Veatch is one author to look up on this (if you can find affordable used copies of his works). The principle textbook for traditional logic that's still in print is Socratic Logic by Peter Kreeft. Be aware that he is sharply critical of symbolic logic. It's good to be aware of the issues involved; in particular, the paradoxes of material implication. When symbolic logic was…
……去理解每一位作者的生平与历史背景。上下文 Context 极其重要。千万别用现代人的思维方式去生搬硬套。如果你想找一本扎实的传统逻辑学入门书，我推荐彼得·克里夫特（Peter Kreeft）的《苏格拉底逻辑》（Socratic Logic）。最后，真正理解斯多葛主义的唯一方法，就是把苏格拉底和柏拉图也一起学透。
…understand the life and history of each author. Context is extremely important. Don't let modern sensibilities fill the gaps. If you're looking for a solid introduction to traditional logic, I recommend you Socratic Logic, by Peter Kreeft. Lastly, the only way to truly understand Stoicism is to learn about Socrates and Plato as well.
彼得·克里夫特的《苏格拉底逻辑》。维克多·弗兰克尔的《活出意义来》。
Socratic Logic by Peter Kreeft. Mans Search for Meaning by Victor Frankl.
如果你在找古典逻辑的入门书，我强烈推荐彼得·克里夫特的《苏格拉底逻辑》。我现在正在读这本书。
If you're looking for an introduction to classical logic, I highly recommend Peter Kreeft's Socratic Logic. I'm reading it right now.
彼得·克里夫特的《苏格拉底逻辑》。《1861–1865年南北战争史》（A History of the Civil War, 1861–1865）是詹姆斯·福特·罗兹在1918年写的一本书。这是我读过用通俗英文写作的最优秀典范之一。教你如何把观点清晰表达出来……
Socratic Logic by Peter Kreeft. A History of the Civil War, 1861–1865 is a book by James Ford Rhodes written in 1918. It is one of finest examples of plain English writing I have read. How to get your point across…
https://www.amazon.com/Socratic-Logic-Questions-Aristotelian... https://www.amazon.com/Mans-Search-Meaning-Viktor-Frankl/dp/... https://www.amazon.com/History-Civil-1861-1865-James-Rhodes/...
https://www.amazon.com/Socratic-Logic-Questions-Aristotelian... https://www.amazon.com/Mans-Search-Meaning-Viktor-Frankl/dp/... https://www.amazon.com/History-Civil-1861-1865-James-Rhodes/...
……以及现代符号逻辑。关于这一点可以查查亨利·B·维奇（Henry B. Veatch）这位作者（如果你能淘到他便宜的二手书的话）。目前仍在出版的传统逻辑学主要教材是彼得·克里夫特的《苏格拉底逻辑》。但要注意，他对符号逻辑持极其尖锐的批评态度。了解其中涉及的问题是有好处的，尤其是实质蕴涵怪论（paradoxes of material implication）。当年符号逻辑……
…as modern symbolic logic. Henry B. Veatch is one author to look up on this (if you can find affordable used copies of his works). The principle textbook for traditional logic that's still in print is Socratic Logic by Peter Kreeft. Be aware that he is sharply critical of symbolic logic. It's good to be aware of the issues involved; in particular, the paradoxes of material implication. When symbolic logic was…