举个例子，有大量证据表明 Netscape 自身商业经营得很差，犯了无数错误，而在现有规则下微软并没有进行不正当竞争。比如可以参考 Liebowitz 和 Margolis 写的《Winners, Losers and Microsoft》（赢家、输家与微软），或者是 Richard McKenzie 写的《Trust on Trial》（反垄断受审）。至于中国劳工的问题，否认确凿证据正好说明你在辩论中已经理屈词穷了。另外，也说明你极度缺乏常识…
There's plenty of evidence that Netscape, for example, was a bad business and made countless mistakes, and that Microsoft did not compete unfairly under the rules. See, for example, Winners, Losers and Microsoft by Liebowitz and Margolis or Trust on Trial by Richard McKenzie. Re Chinese workers, denial of concrete evidence is a good way to show you lost the argument. Also, that you are desperately short of common…
经济学中路径依赖和网络效应的力量被夸大了，可以看看《Winners, Losers, and Microsoft》（赢家、输家与微软）这本书（http://www.amazon.com/Winners-Losers-Microsoft-Stan-Liebowit...），里面有相当透彻的讨论。
The strength of path dependence and network effects in the economy is overrated, see the book "Winners, Losers, and Microsoft", http://www.amazon.com/Winners-Losers-Microsoft-Stan-Liebowit... , for a pretty thorough discussion.
我可以给你推荐几本可能有用的大致书目。有些偏技术，有些没那么硬核。有些偏重人物性格，有些偏重商业层面，有些则更专注于实际技术本身。我实在没时间逐一分类了，所以直接把我手头有的、或者比较熟悉的、觉得至少有那么点关联的书一股脑列出来吧。
《The Mythical Man
I can give you the names of a handful of books that might be useful. Some are more technical, some less so. Some are more about personalities, some about the business aspects of things, some more about the actual technology. I don't really have time to try and categorize them all, so here's a big dump of the ones I have and/or am familiar with that seem at least somewhat related.
The Mythical Man
…如果你去 Google 搜索作者名字和 dvorak（德沃夏克键盘），能搜到好几条反驳那篇论文的论点，我觉得那些反驳并不怎么有说服力，但挺有意思的。内容大幅扩充后的完整版本就是这本书——《Winners, Losers, and Microsoft: Competition and Antitrust in High Technology》（赢家、输家与微软：高科技领域的竞争与反垄断）http://www.amazon.com/Winners-Losers-Microsoft-Competition-I...
…you google on authors names and dvorak, there are several arguments against the paper, I don't think they are particularly convincing, but they are interesting. The much enlarged version is the book "Winners, Losers, and Microsoft: Competition and Antitrust in High Technology" http://www.amazon.com/Winners-Losers-Microsoft-Competition-I...
Maybe not perfect matches, but a few titles I'm familiar with that you might like:
Dreaming in Code - covers Mitch Kapor's post Lotus effort to build Chandler.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dreaming_in_Code
Everyone Else Must Fail - all about Larry Ellison and Oracle
https://www.amazon.com/Everyone-Else-Must-Fail-Unvarnished/d...
Winners, Losers & Microsoft - title says it all
https://www.am
举个例子，有大量证据表明 Netscape 自身商业经营得很差，犯了无数错误，而在现有规则下微软并没有进行不正当竞争。比如可以参考 Liebowitz 和 Margolis 写的《Winners, Losers and Microsoft》（赢家、输家与微软），或者是 Richard McKenzie 写的《Trust on Trial》（反垄断受审）。至于中国劳工的问题，否认确凿证据正好说明你在辩论中已经理屈词穷了。另外，也说明你极度缺乏常识…
There's plenty of evidence that Netscape, for example, was a bad business and made countless mistakes, and that Microsoft did not compete unfairly under the rules. See, for example, Winners, Losers and Microsoft by Liebowitz and Margolis or Trust on Trial by Richard McKenzie. Re Chinese workers, denial of concrete evidence is a good way to show you lost the argument. Also, that you are desperately short of common…
经济学中路径依赖和网络效应的力量被夸大了，可以看看《Winners, Losers, and Microsoft》（赢家、输家与微软）这本书（http://www.amazon.com/Winners-Losers-Microsoft-Stan-Liebowit...），里面有相当透彻的讨论。
The strength of path dependence and network effects in the economy is overrated, see the book "Winners, Losers, and Microsoft", http://www.amazon.com/Winners-Losers-Microsoft-Stan-Liebowit... , for a pretty thorough discussion.
我可以给你推荐几本可能有用的大致书目。有些偏技术，有些没那么硬核。有些偏重人物性格，有些偏重商业层面，有些则更专注于实际技术本身。我实在没时间逐一分类了，所以直接把我手头有的、或者比较熟悉的、觉得至少有那么点关联的书一股脑列出来吧。 《The Mythical Man
I can give you the names of a handful of books that might be useful. Some are more technical, some less so. Some are more about personalities, some about the business aspects of things, some more about the actual technology. I don't really have time to try and categorize them all, so here's a big dump of the ones I have and/or am familiar with that seem at least somewhat related. The Mythical Man
…如果你去 Google 搜索作者名字和 dvorak（德沃夏克键盘），能搜到好几条反驳那篇论文的论点，我觉得那些反驳并不怎么有说服力，但挺有意思的。内容大幅扩充后的完整版本就是这本书——《Winners, Losers, and Microsoft: Competition and Antitrust in High Technology》（赢家、输家与微软：高科技领域的竞争与反垄断）http://www.amazon.com/Winners-Losers-Microsoft-Competition-I...
…you google on authors names and dvorak, there are several arguments against the paper, I don't think they are particularly convincing, but they are interesting. The much enlarged version is the book "Winners, Losers, and Microsoft: Competition and Antitrust in High Technology" http://www.amazon.com/Winners-Losers-Microsoft-Competition-I...
可能不完全符合你的需求，但我比较熟悉、你可能会喜欢的几本书： 《Dreaming in Code》（代码之梦）——讲述了 Mitch Kapor 离开 Lotus 后打造 Chandler 的经历。 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dreaming_in_Code 《Everyone Else Must Fail》（其他人必须失败）——全方位讲述拉里·埃里森（Larry Ellison）和 Oracle 的故事 https://www.amazon.com/Everyone-Else-Must-Fail-Unvarnished/d... 《Winners, Losers & Microsoft》（赢家、输家与微软）——书名说明一切 https://www.am
Maybe not perfect matches, but a few titles I'm familiar with that you might like: Dreaming in Code - covers Mitch Kapor's post Lotus effort to build Chandler. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dreaming_in_Code Everyone Else Must Fail - all about Larry Ellison and Oracle https://www.amazon.com/Everyone-Else-Must-Fail-Unvarnished/d... Winners, Losers & Microsoft - title says it all https://www.am