……在满分 1600 分的 SAT 数学和阅读考试中，要比白人高……分、比西裔高 270 分、比非裔高 450 分，才能拥有同等被私立大学录取的机会。这一结论出自普林斯顿大学社会学家 Thomas Espenshade 于 2009 年合著的《No Longer Separate, Not Yet Equal》一书。”
…whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and 450 points above African-Americans out of a maximum 1600 on the math and reading SAT to have the same chance of admission to a private college, according to “No Longer Separate, Not Yet Equal,” a 2009 book co-written by Princeton sociologist Thomas Espenshade."
……+230，西裔：+185，亚裔：–50，特招体育生：+200，Legacy（校友子女）：+160。2009 年，普林斯顿社会学家 Thomas Espenshade 和研究员 Alexandria Walton Radford 在他们的《No Longer Separate, Not Yet Equal》一书中，研究了 1997 年申请大学的学生数据，并计算出亚裔美国人需要考出近乎完美的 1550 分 SAT 成绩，才能获得与他人同等被顶尖私立大学录取的几率……
…+230 Hispanics: +185 Asians: –50 Recruited athletes: +200 Legacies (children of alumni): +160 In 2009, Princeton sociologist Thomas Espenshade and researcher Alexandria Walton Radford, in their book No Longer Separate, Not Yet Equal, examined data on students applying to college in 1997 and calculated that Asian-Americans needed nearly perfect SAT scores of 1550 to have the same chance of being accepted at a top private university…
先说句实在话，这些数据是 1997 年的。（比如，参见正在讨论的 Espenshade 等人所著的《No longer separate, not yet equal: race and class in elite college admission》一书中的表 3.4。）另外——这倒不算什么问题，只是一个需要注意的方法论特征——他们的模型似乎是通过……建立的。
For what it's worth, this data is from 1997. (E.g., see table 3.4 from the book being discussed, No longer separate, not yet equal: race and class in elite college admission, by Espenshade et al.) Also - and this is not exactly a problem, just a methodological feature to be aware of - it appears that they produced their models by…
……在满分 1600 分的 SAT 数学和阅读考试中，要比白人高……分、比西裔高 270 分、比非裔高 450 分，才能获得同等被私立大学录取的机会，据普林斯顿社会学家 Thomas Espenshade 2009 年合著的《No Longer Separate, Not Yet Equal》所述。””””对于威斯康星大学麦迪逊分校或杜克大学这种录取门槛相当高的院校来说，差距根本没有那么大。我敢打赌你只有去……
…whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and 450 points above African-Americans out of a maximum 1600 on the math and reading SAT to have the same chance of admission to a private college, according to “No Longer Separate, Not Yet Equal,” a 2009 book co-written by Princeton sociologist Thomas Espenshade. """" The gap is nowhere near that large for Wisconsin-Madison or Duke which are rather selective institutions. I bet you're only going…
……细节如下：“要在精英大学获得同等的考量，亚裔在 SAT（总分 1600）中必须比白人高 140 分，比西裔高 280 分，比黑人高 450 分。”摘自 Thomas J. Espenshade 和 Alexandria Walton Radford 所著的《No Longer Separate, Not Yet Equal: Race and Class in Elite College Admission and Campus Life》（2009 年）。出处：http://80-20initiative.blogspot.com/2012/03/450-point-sat-ga...
…here's the detail: "To receive equal consideration by elite colleges, Asian Americans must outperform Whites by 140 points, Hispanics by 280 points, Blacks by 450 points in SAT (Total 1600)." From "No Longer Separate, Not Yet Equal: Race and Class in Elite College Admission and Campus Life" by Thomas J. Espenshade & Alexandria Walton Radford (2009) Source: http://80-20initiative.blogspot.com/2012/03/450-point-sat-ga...
……我坚信存在隐性配额，尽管自然没有哪所大学会承认这一点。《纽约时报》一篇专栏文章里有一段挺有意思的引用：“普林斯顿社会学家 Thomas Espenshade 在其 2009 年的著作《No Longer Separate, Not Yet Equal: Race and Class in Elite College Admission and Campus Life》中写道：‘要在精英大学获得同等的考量，亚裔必须比白人高 140 分，比西裔高 280 分，比黑人……
…I'm convinced there are unofficial quotas, though naturally no university will admit it. An interesting quote from a NY Times op-ed: "The Princeton sociologist Thomas Espenshade wrote in his 2009 book, No Longer Separate, Not Yet Equal: Race and Class in Elite College Admission and Campus Life, that 'to receive equal consideration by elite colleges, Asian Americans must outperform Whites by 140 points, Hispanics by 280 points, Blacks…
……在满分 1600 分的 SAT 数学和阅读考试中，要比白人高……分、比西裔高 270 分、比非裔高 450 分，才能拥有同等被私立大学录取的机会。这一结论出自普林斯顿大学社会学家 Thomas Espenshade 于 2009 年合著的《No Longer Separate, Not Yet Equal》一书。”
…whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and 450 points above African-Americans out of a maximum 1600 on the math and reading SAT to have the same chance of admission to a private college, according to “No Longer Separate, Not Yet Equal,” a 2009 book co-written by Princeton sociologist Thomas Espenshade."
……+230，西裔：+185，亚裔：–50，特招体育生：+200，Legacy（校友子女）：+160。2009 年，普林斯顿社会学家 Thomas Espenshade 和研究员 Alexandria Walton Radford 在他们的《No Longer Separate, Not Yet Equal》一书中，研究了 1997 年申请大学的学生数据，并计算出亚裔美国人需要考出近乎完美的 1550 分 SAT 成绩，才能获得与他人同等被顶尖私立大学录取的几率……
…+230 Hispanics: +185 Asians: –50 Recruited athletes: +200 Legacies (children of alumni): +160 In 2009, Princeton sociologist Thomas Espenshade and researcher Alexandria Walton Radford, in their book No Longer Separate, Not Yet Equal, examined data on students applying to college in 1997 and calculated that Asian-Americans needed nearly perfect SAT scores of 1550 to have the same chance of being accepted at a top private university…
先说句实在话，这些数据是 1997 年的。（比如，参见正在讨论的 Espenshade 等人所著的《No longer separate, not yet equal: race and class in elite college admission》一书中的表 3.4。）另外——这倒不算什么问题，只是一个需要注意的方法论特征——他们的模型似乎是通过……建立的。
For what it's worth, this data is from 1997. (E.g., see table 3.4 from the book being discussed, No longer separate, not yet equal: race and class in elite college admission, by Espenshade et al.) Also - and this is not exactly a problem, just a methodological feature to be aware of - it appears that they produced their models by…
……在满分 1600 分的 SAT 数学和阅读考试中，要比白人高……分、比西裔高 270 分、比非裔高 450 分，才能获得同等被私立大学录取的机会，据普林斯顿社会学家 Thomas Espenshade 2009 年合著的《No Longer Separate, Not Yet Equal》所述。””””对于威斯康星大学麦迪逊分校或杜克大学这种录取门槛相当高的院校来说，差距根本没有那么大。我敢打赌你只有去……
…whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and 450 points above African-Americans out of a maximum 1600 on the math and reading SAT to have the same chance of admission to a private college, according to “No Longer Separate, Not Yet Equal,” a 2009 book co-written by Princeton sociologist Thomas Espenshade. """" The gap is nowhere near that large for Wisconsin-Madison or Duke which are rather selective institutions. I bet you're only going…
……细节如下：“要在精英大学获得同等的考量，亚裔在 SAT（总分 1600）中必须比白人高 140 分，比西裔高 280 分，比黑人高 450 分。”摘自 Thomas J. Espenshade 和 Alexandria Walton Radford 所著的《No Longer Separate, Not Yet Equal: Race and Class in Elite College Admission and Campus Life》（2009 年）。出处：http://80-20initiative.blogspot.com/2012/03/450-point-sat-ga...
…here's the detail: "To receive equal consideration by elite colleges, Asian Americans must outperform Whites by 140 points, Hispanics by 280 points, Blacks by 450 points in SAT (Total 1600)." From "No Longer Separate, Not Yet Equal: Race and Class in Elite College Admission and Campus Life" by Thomas J. Espenshade & Alexandria Walton Radford (2009) Source: http://80-20initiative.blogspot.com/2012/03/450-point-sat-ga...
……我坚信存在隐性配额，尽管自然没有哪所大学会承认这一点。《纽约时报》一篇专栏文章里有一段挺有意思的引用：“普林斯顿社会学家 Thomas Espenshade 在其 2009 年的著作《No Longer Separate, Not Yet Equal: Race and Class in Elite College Admission and Campus Life》中写道：‘要在精英大学获得同等的考量，亚裔必须比白人高 140 分，比西裔高 280 分，比黑人……
…I'm convinced there are unofficial quotas, though naturally no university will admit it. An interesting quote from a NY Times op-ed: "The Princeton sociologist Thomas Espenshade wrote in his 2009 book, No Longer Separate, Not Yet Equal: Race and Class in Elite College Admission and Campus Life, that 'to receive equal consideration by elite colleges, Asian Americans must outperform Whites by 140 points, Hispanics by 280 points, Blacks…