John Gall 写的《Systemantics: How Systems Work & Especially How They Fail》。https://www.amazon.co.uk/Systemantics-Systems-Work-Especiall... 写作风格有点不同寻常，但里面蕴含着大量的智慧…
Systemantics: How Systems Work & Especially How They Fail by John Gall. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Systemantics-Systems-Work-Especiall... The writing style is kind of unusual, but there is a lot of wisdom to be found…
…dismiss it because it worked in the previous 99% of the time. People have trained themselves to trust the results so questioning it does not even enter their minds. It does remind me though of the book Systemantics: https://www.amazon.com/Systemantics-Systems-Work-Especially-... One of the core thesis in the book is : The system itself does not actually do what it says it is doing (The Operational Fallacy). This…
我读 John Gall 的《Systemantics》读到一半了，非常喜欢。接下来我可以读点啥呢？我觉得自己对系统论在现实世界中的应用更感兴趣（比如我们该如何着手去修复一个极其复杂的…
I'm halfway through John Gall's Systemantics and have been really enjoying it. What might I move on to next? I think I'm more interested in the real-world applications of systems theory (e.g. how we might go about fixing a massively complicated…
…那一点。“P 文学”（P Literature）——帕金森定律（Parkinson's Law）、彼得原理（Peter Principle）、普特定律（Putt's Law）以及 Stephen Potter 的《Gamesmanship》似乎构成了核心的一部分。我还会把杰文斯悖论（Jevons paradox）、格雷欣法则（Gresham's Law）以及 John Gall 的《Systemantics》也加进去 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Putt%27s_Law_and_the_Successfu... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systemantics 支离破碎的模型和思维框架——即理论与意识形态——在其中起到了巨大的推波助澜作用。我一直重点关注…
…that. The "P Literature" -- Parkinson's Law, the Peter Principle, Putt's Law, and Stephen Potter's Gamesmanship seem to form part of a core. I'd add the Jevons paradox, Gresham's Law, and John Gall's Systemantics as well https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Putt%27s_Law_and_the_Successfu... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systemantics Broken models and frames -- theory and ideology -- contribute hugely. I've been focusing…
是的，我读到这个的第一反应是，任何关于这个主题的讨论，如果不仔细读一读 Gall 的《Systemantics》（https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systemantics），都是不完整的。
Yep, my first thought upon reading this was that no discussion of this subject is complete without a perusal of Gall's Systemantics (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systemantics).
我脑子里刚冒出来一个念头：你知道 John Gall 写的《Systemantics》（也叫《The Systems Bible》）这本书吗？它不是讲教育的，但和我们正在讨论的领域高度契合。这是一本神作级别的地下经典（而且超级搞笑）。我想你会喜欢的。…
Just popped into my mind: do you know the book "Systemantics" (also known as "The Systems Bible") by John Gall? It's not on education but is very much in the space we're discussing. It's a brilliant (and hilarious) underground classic. I think you would like it.…
John Gall 写的《Systemantics: How Systems Work & Especially How They Fail》。https://www.amazon.co.uk/Systemantics-Systems-Work-Especiall... 写作风格有点不同寻常，但里面蕴含着大量的智慧…
Systemantics: How Systems Work & Especially How They Fail by John Gall. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Systemantics-Systems-Work-Especiall... The writing style is kind of unusual, but there is a lot of wisdom to be found…
…直接无视掉，因为前面 99% 的时间里它都管用。人们已经习惯了盲目信任结果，以至于连质疑一下的念头都不会冒出来。不过这倒让我想起了《Systemantics》这本书：https://www.amazon.com/Systemantics-Systems-Work-Especially-... 书里的核心论点之一就是：系统本身实际上并没有做它声称正在做的事（操作性谬误，The Operational Fallacy）。这…
…dismiss it because it worked in the previous 99% of the time. People have trained themselves to trust the results so questioning it does not even enter their minds. It does remind me though of the book Systemantics: https://www.amazon.com/Systemantics-Systems-Work-Especially-... One of the core thesis in the book is : The system itself does not actually do what it says it is doing (The Operational Fallacy). This…
我读 John Gall 的《Systemantics》读到一半了，非常喜欢。接下来我可以读点啥呢？我觉得自己对系统论在现实世界中的应用更感兴趣（比如我们该如何着手去修复一个极其复杂的…
I'm halfway through John Gall's Systemantics and have been really enjoying it. What might I move on to next? I think I'm more interested in the real-world applications of systems theory (e.g. how we might go about fixing a massively complicated…
…那一点。“P 文学”（P Literature）——帕金森定律（Parkinson's Law）、彼得原理（Peter Principle）、普特定律（Putt's Law）以及 Stephen Potter 的《Gamesmanship》似乎构成了核心的一部分。我还会把杰文斯悖论（Jevons paradox）、格雷欣法则（Gresham's Law）以及 John Gall 的《Systemantics》也加进去 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Putt%27s_Law_and_the_Successfu... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systemantics 支离破碎的模型和思维框架——即理论与意识形态——在其中起到了巨大的推波助澜作用。我一直重点关注…
…that. The "P Literature" -- Parkinson's Law, the Peter Principle, Putt's Law, and Stephen Potter's Gamesmanship seem to form part of a core. I'd add the Jevons paradox, Gresham's Law, and John Gall's Systemantics as well https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Putt%27s_Law_and_the_Successfu... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systemantics Broken models and frames -- theory and ideology -- contribute hugely. I've been focusing…
是的，我读到这个的第一反应是，任何关于这个主题的讨论，如果不仔细读一读 Gall 的《Systemantics》（https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systemantics），都是不完整的。
Yep, my first thought upon reading this was that no discussion of this subject is complete without a perusal of Gall's Systemantics (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systemantics).
我脑子里刚冒出来一个念头：你知道 John Gall 写的《Systemantics》（也叫《The Systems Bible》）这本书吗？它不是讲教育的，但和我们正在讨论的领域高度契合。这是一本神作级别的地下经典（而且超级搞笑）。我想你会喜欢的。…
Just popped into my mind: do you know the book "Systemantics" (also known as "The Systems Bible") by John Gall? It's not on education but is very much in the space we're discussing. It's a brilliant (and hilarious) underground classic. I think you would like it.…