…图书和期刊页面上赫然列着至少两本会被绝大多数主流空间科学家视为异端的书：埃里克·勒纳的《大爆炸从未发生》（The Big Bang Never Happened）和唐·斯科特的《电性天空》（The Electric Sky）。前者批判了 Lambda-CDM 物理宇宙学（至今仍存的）疑难问题，而后者则探讨了诸如脉冲星本质上是电现象（而非引力现象）之类的观点…
…the books and journals page are shamelessly listed at least two titles which would be considered heretical by most mainstream space scientists: Eric Lerner's The Big Bang Never Happened and Don Scott's Electric Sky. The former critiques (still) problematical aspects of Lambda-CDM physical cosmology, while the latter explores such ideas as phenomenon like pulsars being essentially electrical in nature (not gravitational)…
…who challenge conventional wisdom, but the vast majority of people who challenge conventional wisdom end up being wrong. I did read some of the page, but gave up after it was clear that he thought his "Electric Sky" hypothesis was an alternative to general relativity. It might very well be one could construct a credible argument in some areas, but look at the wikipedia page for tests of General Relativity: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tests_of_general_relativity…
…图书和期刊页面上赫然列着至少两本会被绝大多数主流空间科学家视为异端的书：埃里克·勒纳的《大爆炸从未发生》（The Big Bang Never Happened）和唐·斯科特的《电性天空》（The Electric Sky）。前者批判了 Lambda-CDM 物理宇宙学（至今仍存的）疑难问题，而后者则探讨了诸如脉冲星本质上是电现象（而非引力现象）之类的观点…
…the books and journals page are shamelessly listed at least two titles which would be considered heretical by most mainstream space scientists: Eric Lerner's The Big Bang Never Happened and Don Scott's Electric Sky. The former critiques (still) problematical aspects of Lambda-CDM physical cosmology, while the latter explores such ideas as phenomenon like pulsars being essentially electrical in nature (not gravitational)…
…那些挑战传统认知的人，但绝大多数挑战传统认知的人最终都被证明是错的。我确实读了一部分页面，但当发现他显然把自己的“电性天空”（Electric Sky）假说当作广义相对论的替代方案时，我就放弃了。也许在某些领域人们完全能构建出站得住脚的论点，但看看维基百科上关于广义相对论检验的词条吧：http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tests_of_general_relativity…
…who challenge conventional wisdom, but the vast majority of people who challenge conventional wisdom end up being wrong. I did read some of the page, but gave up after it was clear that he thought his "Electric Sky" hypothesis was an alternative to general relativity. It might very well be one could construct a credible argument in some areas, but look at the wikipedia page for tests of General Relativity: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tests_of_general_relativity…