不受欢迎的注视
The unwanted gaze
Jeffrey Rosen · 初版 2000 年
4人推荐
4位读者提及
9次提及
在本书中，Jeffrey Rosen 探讨了法律、技术和文化层面的变化如何削弱了我们控制个人信息外泄程度的能力，并提出了重建部分已被法律和技术侵蚀的隐私领域的途径。在一个美国人所阅读、书写和购买的一切都可能在网络空间被记录和监控的世界里，原本仅透露给朋友和同事的私密个人信息正面临着被曝光——并被广大群体误解——的日益严重的危险……
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
……前提是这样做不会削弱其净效益和正当性。透明度过高绝对会成问题，杰弗里·罗森（Jeffrey Rosen）在他的书《不受欢迎的凝视》（The Unwanted Gaze）中对这一点给出了很好的反驳。但考虑到奥巴马亲自出面阻挠科学研究开展，我觉得我们离那个临界点还差得远呢。[1] [1] 参见奥巴马提名 Michele 引发的争议……
…to the extent that doing so does not erode its net good and properness. There can definitely be such a thing as too much transparency, which Jeffrey Rosen makes a good argument against in his book The Unwanted Gaze. But with Obama personally going out of his way to block scientific research from taking place I don't think we're anywhere near that point yet.[1] [1] C.f. the controversy around Obama nominating Michele…
……明确这些原则时，我注意到一个惊人的事实：这几乎就是招致鄙视性第一反应的现成配方。”杰弗里·罗森（Jeffrey Rosen）在他的书《不受欢迎的凝视》（The Unwanted Gaze）中对此有精辟的论述。他为隐私权辩护的论点之一就是：新想法刚冒出来时往往显得错漏百出，尤其是当它们还不成熟的时候。正因如此，当政府……进步就会受到严重阻碍。
…principles explicitly, I noticed something striking: this is practically a recipe for generating a contemptuous initial reaction." Jeffrey Rosen has some good stuff to say about this in his book The Unwanted Gaze. One of his defenses of the right to privacy is that new ideas often seem wrong at first, especially when they're still only half baked. And because of this, progress is seriously impeded when the government…
……正因如此，隐私的演变总是落后于这些技术而不是走在前面，它本质上*是被动反应性的，而非先发制人。我没见其他人有过类似的明确表述，不过杰弗里·罗森（Jeffrey Rosen）的《不受欢迎的凝视》（The Unwanted Gaze）、丹尼尔·J·索洛夫（Daniel J. Solove）和海伦·尼森鲍姆（Helen Nissenbaum）的大量著作都让我觉得水准极高。哈佛历史学家吉尔·莱波尔（Jill Lepore）写过一篇极棒的人物传记：<https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/jlepore/files/lepore_secre...>……
…such, evolution of privacy follows rather than leads such technologies, it is inherently* reactive, no preemptive. I'm not aware of an explicit similar statement from others though Jeffrey Rosen's The Unwanted Gaze, much of the work of Daniel J. Solove and Helen Nissenbaum have struck me as above par. Harvard historian Jill Lepore has an excellent biography: <https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/jlepore/files/lepore_secre...>…
……一个被热烈讨论的话题，我很惊讶有两个极大的要点竟然从未被提起”其实那几个论点在几乎每本关于隐私的书里都会出现。你的第一个论点在杰弗里·罗森的书《不受欢迎的凝视》（The Unwanted Gaze）里被深入探讨过，而你的第二个论点差不多就是布鲁斯·施奈尔（Bruce Schneier）那本《超越恐惧》（Beyond Fear）的核心主旨。另外也可以看看丹尼尔·索洛夫（Daniel Solove）的任何一本书。
…much-discussed subject, I'm surprised that two huge points never arise" Actually those points come up in pretty much every book about privacy. Your first point is heavily discussed in Jeffrey Rosen's book The Unwanted Gaze, and your second point is sort of the point of Bruce Schneier's book Beyond Fear. See also any of Daniel Solove's books.
……观点。她是一位历史学家，应该会详尽地记录一些大家可能感兴趣的资料来源。《看不见的：隐私史》（Unseen: A History of Privacy，2013）https://scholar.harvard.edu/jlepore/presentations/unseen-his... 杰弗里·罗森的《不受欢迎的凝视》（The Unwanted Gaze，2001）探讨了互联网时代初具雏形时的担忧。https://www.worldcat.org/title/unwanted-gaze-the-destruction... EFF 和 ACLU 拥有大量的隐私资源，……
…point. She's a historian, and should be copiously documenting sources which may be of interest. Unseen: A History of Privacy (2013) https://scholar.harvard.edu/jlepore/presentations/unseen-his... The Unwanted Gaze by Jeffrey Rosen (2001) addresses concerns as the Internet age was beginning to mature. https://www.worldcat.org/title/unwanted-gaze-the-destruction... The EFF and ACLU have extensive resources on privacy,…
说到这个链接……几十年前我买过一本杰弗里·罗森（Jeffrey Rosen）的《不受欢迎的凝视》（The Unwanted Gaze）。只要有时间能读进去，我几乎向所有人推荐这本书，尤其是如果你属于那种“我又没有什么见不得人的事”的心态的人。
Apropos of this link... a couple decades ago I picked up a copy of Jeffrey Rosen's "The Unwanted Gaze." I recommend it to mostly everyone who has time to digest it, especially of you're one of the "I have nothing to hide" people.