…偏底层，但有时会把证明留给读者——比如，告诉你随时准备用一种优势换取另一种优势——到底是哪个优势来着？John Watson 凭借《Secrets of Modern Chess Strategy》和《Chess Strategy in Action》一锤定音，这两本书一出直接把专家们惊得目瞪口呆。在此期间，我还给他发邮件探讨过，建议去理解局面中的细微差别，以及细小的差距如何…
…lower level, but sometimes leaves proofs to the reader - for instance, tells you to be ready to swap one advantage for another - which advantage, again? John Watson cleared the bases with "Secrets of Modern Chess Strategy" and "Chess Strategy in Action", which simply dumbfounded the pundits when they came out. Between them, I prodded him with an email suggesting that understanding nuances in positions, and how small differences…
For what it’s worth, John Watson, in his book Modern Chess Strategy, lists the Q+N > Q+B thing as a belief that used to be common in the past, but is proven wrong by modern practice. I’m not nearly strong enough to have an opinion on the matter myself.
…偏底层，但有时会把证明留给读者——比如，告诉你随时准备用一种优势换取另一种优势——到底是哪个优势来着？John Watson 凭借《Secrets of Modern Chess Strategy》和《Chess Strategy in Action》一锤定音，这两本书一出直接把专家们惊得目瞪口呆。在此期间，我还给他发邮件探讨过，建议去理解局面中的细微差别，以及细小的差距如何…
…lower level, but sometimes leaves proofs to the reader - for instance, tells you to be ready to swap one advantage for another - which advantage, again? John Watson cleared the bases with "Secrets of Modern Chess Strategy" and "Chess Strategy in Action", which simply dumbfounded the pundits when they came out. Between them, I prodded him with an email suggesting that understanding nuances in positions, and how small differences…
姑且提一句，John Watson 在他的书《Modern Chess Strategy》里提到，Q+N > Q+B（后马优于后象）这种说法在过去很普遍，但已经被现代对局证明是错的。我自己水平差得远，在这件事上发表不了什么意见。
For what it’s worth, John Watson, in his book Modern Chess Strategy, lists the Q+N > Q+B thing as a belief that used to be common in the past, but is proven wrong by modern practice. I’m not nearly strong enough to have an opinion on the matter myself.