你可能会喜欢 Gregory Bateson 的两本书：《Steps to an Ecology of Mind》和《Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity》。他探讨了演化与思维是同一现象的观点，以及我们所谓的“心灵”其实是弥漫在周围环境中的。
You might like a couple of books by Gregory Bateson, "Steps to an Ecology of Mind" and "Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity" He explores the idea that evolution and thought are the same phenomenon, and that what we call "mind" is ambient.
Gregory Bateson has a good piece in one of his books (it might have been "Steps to an Ecology of Mind") where he derives from cybernetic principals the result that Darwinian evolution works better than Lamarckian. The key insight is that we can think of meta-evolution driving the form of the "first-order"…
……‘拉马克式’进化，并不是因为后者不可能发生，而是因为前者具有适应性优势。Gregory Bateson 在他的一本书里从控制论的第一性原理推导出了这一点。我记得是《心智生态学之道》（Steps to an Ecology of Mind）。无论是哪种进化系统，最终都会演化成主要表现为达尔文式的进化。理解这一点的另一种方式是，考虑到在……中你根本无法区分‘达尔文式’与‘拉马克式’
…"Lamarckian" evolution not because the latter is impossible, but because there is adaptive advantage to the former. Gregory Bateson works this out from cybernetic first principles in one of his books. "Steps to an Ecology of Mind" I think. An evolving system of either kind will evolve to evince mostly Darwinian evolution. Another way to understand this is to consider that you cannot distinguish "Darwinian" vs. "Lamarckian" in…
……思想的隐匿晦涩在早期控制论著作中相当普遍。不用说，许多读懂 Wiener（维纳）愿景的人都会觉得它极其消极。而在 Bateson 的《心智生态学之道》（Steps to an Ecology of Mind）中，则探讨了另一种替代方案。
…occultation of ideas is somewhat common in early cybernetics works. Needless to say, the vision of Wiener will be seen by many who understand it as supremely negative. An alternative is explored in 'Steps to an Ecology of Mind' by Bateson.
……http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/ASHBBOOK.html http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/books/IntroCyb.pdf 关于范式转移，我其实不知道有什么单一的好资料，但 Gregory Bateson 的著作，特别是《Steps to an Ecology of Mind》和《Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity》，对我很有帮助。https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregory_Bateson https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steps_to_an_Ecology_of_Mind https://archive.org/details/mindnaturenecess00baterich
…http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/ASHBBOOK.html http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/books/IntroCyb.pdf In re: paradigm shift, I don't really know of a single good source for that, but the works of Gregory Bateson, specifically "Steps to an Ecology of Mind" and "Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity", were useful to me. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregory_Bateson https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steps_to_an_Ecology_of_Mind https://archive.org/details/mindnaturenecess00baterich
我推荐读读《心智生态学之道》（Steps to an Ecology of mind）。我虽然对 Bateson 这个名头极为不屑，但在脑震荡后不久读到这部作品，觉得非常振奋人心。如果你想聊聊我当时为了把自己的思绪流串行化而做的一些练习……
I would recommend reading Steps to an Ecology of mind. I have a great deal of disdain for the bateson name but i found this work very uplifting shortly after a concussion. If you'd like to talk about some of the exercises i undertook to serialize my stream…
你可能会喜欢 Gregory Bateson 的两本书：《Steps to an Ecology of Mind》和《Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity》。他探讨了演化与思维是同一现象的观点，以及我们所谓的“心灵”其实是弥漫在周围环境中的。
You might like a couple of books by Gregory Bateson, "Steps to an Ecology of Mind" and "Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity" He explores the idea that evolution and thought are the same phenomenon, and that what we call "mind" is ambient.
Gregory Bateson 在他的一本书里（可能就是《心智生态学之道》）有一段很精彩的论述，他从控制论原理推导出了达尔文式进化比拉马克式进化更有效的结论。其核心洞见在于，我们可以认为元进化驱动了‘一阶’……的形式
Gregory Bateson has a good piece in one of his books (it might have been "Steps to an Ecology of Mind") where he derives from cybernetic principals the result that Darwinian evolution works better than Lamarckian. The key insight is that we can think of meta-evolution driving the form of the "first-order"…
……‘拉马克式’进化，并不是因为后者不可能发生，而是因为前者具有适应性优势。Gregory Bateson 在他的一本书里从控制论的第一性原理推导出了这一点。我记得是《心智生态学之道》（Steps to an Ecology of Mind）。无论是哪种进化系统，最终都会演化成主要表现为达尔文式的进化。理解这一点的另一种方式是，考虑到在……中你根本无法区分‘达尔文式’与‘拉马克式’
…"Lamarckian" evolution not because the latter is impossible, but because there is adaptive advantage to the former. Gregory Bateson works this out from cybernetic first principles in one of his books. "Steps to an Ecology of Mind" I think. An evolving system of either kind will evolve to evince mostly Darwinian evolution. Another way to understand this is to consider that you cannot distinguish "Darwinian" vs. "Lamarckian" in…
……思想的隐匿晦涩在早期控制论著作中相当普遍。不用说，许多读懂 Wiener（维纳）愿景的人都会觉得它极其消极。而在 Bateson 的《心智生态学之道》（Steps to an Ecology of Mind）中，则探讨了另一种替代方案。
…occultation of ideas is somewhat common in early cybernetics works. Needless to say, the vision of Wiener will be seen by many who understand it as supremely negative. An alternative is explored in 'Steps to an Ecology of Mind' by Bateson.
……http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/ASHBBOOK.html http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/books/IntroCyb.pdf 关于范式转移，我其实不知道有什么单一的好资料，但 Gregory Bateson 的著作，特别是《Steps to an Ecology of Mind》和《Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity》，对我很有帮助。https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregory_Bateson https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steps_to_an_Ecology_of_Mind https://archive.org/details/mindnaturenecess00baterich
…http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/ASHBBOOK.html http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/books/IntroCyb.pdf In re: paradigm shift, I don't really know of a single good source for that, but the works of Gregory Bateson, specifically "Steps to an Ecology of Mind" and "Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity", were useful to me. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregory_Bateson https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steps_to_an_Ecology_of_Mind https://archive.org/details/mindnaturenecess00baterich
我推荐读读《心智生态学之道》（Steps to an Ecology of mind）。我虽然对 Bateson 这个名头极为不屑，但在脑震荡后不久读到这部作品，觉得非常振奋人心。如果你想聊聊我当时为了把自己的思绪流串行化而做的一些练习……
I would recommend reading Steps to an Ecology of mind. I have a great deal of disdain for the bateson name but i found this work very uplifting shortly after a concussion. If you'd like to talk about some of the exercises i undertook to serialize my stream…