生命的壮阔
Full House
Stephen Jay Gould · 初版 1996 年
3人推荐
5位读者提及
6次提及
在 Full House 中，Gould 纠正了普遍存在的人类中心主义世界观，有力地论证了一种全新的进步范式——在这套范式中，多样性而非复杂性才是衡量卓越的真正标准。在此过程中，Full House 教会了我们如何将发展趋势理解为完整系统内部变异性的改变，而非单纯是“事物向某处移动”。
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
Full House
Stephen Jay Gould · 初版 1996 年
在 Full House 中，Gould 纠正了普遍存在的人类中心主义世界观，有力地论证了一种全新的进步范式——在这套范式中，多样性而非复杂性才是衡量卓越的真正标准。在此过程中，Full House 教会了我们如何将发展趋势理解为完整系统内部变异性的改变，而非单纯是“事物向某处移动”。
正在加载完整评论……
《满堂红：从柏拉图到达尔文的卓越扩散》（Full House - The Spread of Excellence from Plato to Darwin），斯蒂芬·杰·古尔德（Stephen Jay Gould）著。马的进化、棒球中 4 成打击率（.400）的消失、现代天才都去哪儿了，以及最核心的部分——占据主导地位的……
Full House - The Spread of Excellence from Plato to Darwin, by Stephen Jay Gould Evolution of horses, disappearance of the .400 in baseball, where are all the modern Geniuses, and the most integral part- the dominance…
虽然很老了，但我 2019 年才第一次读到它们：林恩·马古利斯（Lynn Margulis）的《微观宇宙》（Microcosmos）和斯蒂芬·杰·古尔德（Stephen Jay Gould）的《满堂红》（Full House）。这两本书都彻底震撼了我，改变了我的世界观。我还开了尼克·莱恩（Nick Lane）的《至关重要的问题》（The Vital Question），但还没读完。不过基于……我无论如何也会推荐它。
Pretty old but I read them for the first time in 2019: Microcosmos by Lynn Margulis and Full House by Stephen Jay Gould. Both of them really blew me away and changed my worldview. I also started on The Vital Question by Nick Lane but haven't finished it yet. But I would recommend anyways based on…
萨根（Sagan）的任何作品：《科学体验的种类：对寻找上帝的个人见解》（Varieties of Scientific Experience: A Personal View of the Search for God）能把教皇都变成不可知论者。斯蒂芬·杰·古尔德（Stephen Jay Gould）：《满堂红：从柏拉图到达尔文的卓越扩散》（Full House: The Spread of Excellence from Plato to Darwin）：它既会挑战你以往的所有固有认知，又会用相似的模型和规律把表面看似绝不可能相关的现象联系在一起，并且……
Anything from Sagan: Varieties of Scientific Experience: A Personal View of the Search for God could convert the Pope to agnosticism. Stephen Ray Gould: Full House: The Spread of Excellence from Plato to Darwin: will both challenge every preconceived notion you've had, link seemingly impossibly unrelated phenomenon together using similar models and patterns, and…
……深埋在麦克斯韦妖的心智之中。这是我们人类的偏见，倾向于相信那种普遍神话，即不断膨胀的复杂性是时间流逝的“必然”结果；参考斯蒂芬·杰·古尔德（Stephen Jay Gould）的《满堂红：从柏拉图到达尔文的卓越扩散》[0]，这是现代进化论者所能提供的唯一站得住脚的反驳。>当考虑到通过……组织起来的知识可能具有的传递性收益时
…interred in the mind of Maxwell's demon. This is our human bias favoring the common myth of ever-expanding complexity is an "inevitable" result of the passage of time; refer to Stephen Jay Gould's "Full House: The Spread of Excellence from Plato to Darwin"[0] for the only palatable refute modern evolutionists can offer. >When taking into account the possible transitive benefits of knowledge organized via…
说得好。用于国家间比较的平均成绩可能会上升，而方差却在缩小，导致极高和极低的极端表现者变少甚至消失。这让我想起了斯蒂芬·杰·古尔德（Stephen Jay Gould）的书《满堂红》（Full House）。
Good point. Mean performance, that is used to compare countries, may rise while variance shrinks resulting in fewer if any extremely high and low performers. Reminds me of Stephen Jay Gould's book "Full House".
斯蒂芬·古尔德（Stephen Gould）写了整整一本书来反驳生命复杂性在增加这一观点：《满堂红：从柏拉图到达尔文的卓越扩散》（Full House: The Spread of Excellence from Plato to Darwin）。其核心论点是地球上几乎所有生命至今仍然是原核生物……我们其他人不过是四舍五入的舍入误差罢了。他写过好几本关于进化如何……
Stephen Gould wrote a whole book disputing this idea that the complexity of life increases: "Full House: The Spread of Excellence from Plato to Darwin." The basic argument is that almost all life on Earth is still prokaryotic...the rest of us are just a rounding error. He wrote several books about how evolution…