Michael Parenti 写的《The Assassination of Julius Caesar: A People's History of Ancient Rome》值得一读。虽然我不同意书里的观点，我受不了这个残酷的帝国主义者。https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/37811.The_Assassination_...
"The Assassination of Julius Caesar: A People's History of Ancient Rome" by Michael Parenti is worth reading. Though I don't agree with it, I can't stand this cruel imperialist. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/37811.The_Assassination_...
如果你想看最慷慨激昂、最富娱乐性的批判（不仅是针对他本人，更是针对不加批判地接受其言论的传统），那当属 Michael Parenti 在《The Assassination of Julius Caesar》中的剖析。不过你也可以读读西塞罗的两场喀提林阴谋，第一场纯属捏造，第二场则被极尽夸大渲染，可以参考他针对喀提林的第二次演说第四章第 7-8 节…
If you want the most passionate and entertaining takedown (not just of the man but the tradition that has accepted his output uncritically), it would be Michael Parenti’s in The Assassination of Julius Caesar. But you can read about Cicero’s two Catiline conspiracies, the first completely fabricated, the second embellished beyond all reason, see his second oration against Catiline, chapter 4, sections 7-8…
是的，但还有另一头房间里的大象。别低估特朗普，他可能没读过 Michael Parenti 对《The Assassination of Julius Caesar》的解读：Parenti 认为凯撒被杀并不是因为他是个威胁共和国自由的暴君，而是因为他是一个挑战罗马寡头财富、权力和战争渴望的平民派改革者。也许 Parenti…
Yes, but there is also the other elephant in the room. Don’t underestimate Trump, he may not have read about Michael Parenti’s explanation of The Assassination of Julius Caesar: where he argues that Caesar was killed not as a tyrant threatening republican liberty, but as a popular reformer who challenged the Roman oligarchy's wealth and power and thirst for wars. Maybe Parenti…
Michael Parenti 写的《The Assassination of Julius Caesar: A People's History of Ancient Rome》值得一读。虽然我不同意书里的观点，我受不了这个残酷的帝国主义者。https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/37811.The_Assassination_...
"The Assassination of Julius Caesar: A People's History of Ancient Rome" by Michael Parenti is worth reading. Though I don't agree with it, I can't stand this cruel imperialist. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/37811.The_Assassination_...
如果你想看最慷慨激昂、最富娱乐性的批判（不仅是针对他本人，更是针对不加批判地接受其言论的传统），那当属 Michael Parenti 在《The Assassination of Julius Caesar》中的剖析。不过你也可以读读西塞罗的两场喀提林阴谋，第一场纯属捏造，第二场则被极尽夸大渲染，可以参考他针对喀提林的第二次演说第四章第 7-8 节…
If you want the most passionate and entertaining takedown (not just of the man but the tradition that has accepted his output uncritically), it would be Michael Parenti’s in The Assassination of Julius Caesar. But you can read about Cicero’s two Catiline conspiracies, the first completely fabricated, the second embellished beyond all reason, see his second oration against Catiline, chapter 4, sections 7-8…
是的，但还有另一头房间里的大象。别低估特朗普，他可能没读过 Michael Parenti 对《The Assassination of Julius Caesar》的解读：Parenti 认为凯撒被杀并不是因为他是个威胁共和国自由的暴君，而是因为他是一个挑战罗马寡头财富、权力和战争渴望的平民派改革者。也许 Parenti…
Yes, but there is also the other elephant in the room. Don’t underestimate Trump, he may not have read about Michael Parenti’s explanation of The Assassination of Julius Caesar: where he argues that Caesar was killed not as a tyrant threatening republican liberty, but as a popular reformer who challenged the Roman oligarchy's wealth and power and thirst for wars. Maybe Parenti…