I mean, that’s how it’s taught in a majority of evangelical churches, which is what I gather you mean. St. Augustine was pretty clear that it wasn’t a literal seven days, and Pope Pius XII in Humani generis accepted that human evolution was a thing. So, granting the numerical superiority of the Catholic tradition, not a majority of churches.
There are multiple creationist theories. The one you described is close to sanctioned Roman Catholic view, for example. Since _Humani Generis_ by Pope Pius XII, the accepted view is that evolution, indeed, goes as it does, under divine supervision, and then when bodies reached a form fitting the pinnacle of creation (human), another act of…
我的意思是，大多数福音派教会就是这么教的，我猜你说的就是这个意思。圣奥古斯丁说得很清楚，那并不是字面意义上的七天，而教皇庇护十二世在《Humani Generis》中也承认人类进化是事实。所以，考虑到天主教传统在数量上的优势，多数教会并不持那种观点。
I mean, that’s how it’s taught in a majority of evangelical churches, which is what I gather you mean. St. Augustine was pretty clear that it wasn’t a literal seven days, and Pope Pius XII in Humani generis accepted that human evolution was a thing. So, granting the numerical superiority of the Catholic tradition, not a majority of churches.
创造论有多个版本。比如，你描述的那种就接近罗马天主教官方认可的觀點。自教皇庇护十二世发布《Humani Generis》以来，被接受的观点是：进化确实按照其规律进行，但处于神的监督之下，然后当身体达到适合创造之巅（人类）的形态时，另一次行动……
There are multiple creationist theories. The one you described is close to sanctioned Roman Catholic view, for example. Since _Humani Generis_ by Pope Pius XII, the accepted view is that evolution, indeed, goes as it does, under divine supervision, and then when bodies reached a form fitting the pinnacle of creation (human), another act of…