《纳米系统》封面

纳米系统

Nanosystems

K. Eric Drexler · 初版 1992 年

6人推荐
19位读者提及
30次提及

为什么值得读

  • 详尽探讨当前物理规律下纳米制造的可行性
  • 包含杆逻辑计算机与原子装配等硬核构想
  • 展示理论应用科学严谨推演技术可能性的范式

“由该领域的领军研究者兼奠基人之一撰写,《Nanosystems》是第一部针对分子纳米技术的技术性导论——这是一门引发了日益增长的关注与争议的新兴学科。这部开创性的著作阐述了基础物理原理、元器件与设备,随后探讨了包括前所未有强大算力的计算机,以及能够逐个分子构建此类产品的制造系统在内的各种应用。”“《Nanosystems》全面概述了分子制造将如何利用纳米级(十亿分之一米)

Hacker News 上怎么说

  • ……在他在《创造的发动机》(Engines of Creation)一书中是可行的。该书最新修订版的免费电子书可以在这里下载:http://www.wowio.com/users/product.asp?BookId=503。一本偏技术层面的书是《纳米系统》(Nanosystems):http://www.amazon.com/Nanosystems-Molecular-Machinery-Manufa...

    …it's feasible in his book "Engines of Creation". A newly revised version of it is available for free as an eBook: http://www.wowio.com/users/product.asp?BookId=503 A more technically oriented book is "Nanosystems": http://www.amazon.com/Nanosystems-Molecular-Machinery-Manufa...

  • ……年前。里面干货满满:怎么用杆逻辑(rod logic)造计算机、怎么通过级联过滤器获取高纯度元素源……还有用来组装单个原子的骨架装置。http://www.amazon.com/Nanosystems-Molecular-Machinery-Manufa... 理查德·费曼显然有过这种递归的想法:用一台车床做一台微型车床,再用微型车床做一台极其微小的车床……一直这么套娃下去。这就是……

    …ago. there's great stuff in there. how to build a computer out of rod logic. how get pure sources of elements by cascading filters... armatures for assembling individual atoms. http://www.amazon.com/Nanosystems-Molecular-Machinery-Manufa... Richard Feynman apparently had recursive ideas, use a lathe to make a tiny lathe, use the tiny lathe to make a really really tiny lathe... all the way down. This is the…

  • 超光速和反重力违背了物理定律,但德雷克斯勒的设计根本没有。你在《纳米系统》里给我找出一个在物理上无法建造的设计看看?《纳米系统》的核心目的,就是在我们当前对微观尺度物理学理解的前提下,去探索到底哪些技术是可行的。事实证明有……

    FTL and antigravity violate physical law. Drexler’s designs just don’t. Point me to a design in Nanosystems the that is physically impossible to construct. The point of Nanosystems was to explore what technologies are feasible given our current understanding of physics at that scale. It turns out there is…

  • ……“理论应用科学,一种旨在描述技术可能性的研究模式,其受到的约束不是当下的实验室和工厂技术,而是物理定律。”——埃里克·德雷克斯勒,《纳米系统》,附录A。这家伙把自己的目标说得一清二楚,像 Scott Locklin 在这里这样打稻草人来踩德雷克斯勒,实在是很下作。物理学家在考量……

    …theoretical applied science, a mode of research which aims to describe technological possibilities as constrained not by present-day laboratory and factory techniques, but by physical law." -Eric Drexler, Nanosystems, Appendix A. Dude was very clear about his aims, and it is a shitty kind of strawman argument to dunk on Drexler like Scott Locklin is doing here. Physicists think like this all the time when considering…

  • 如果有人对分子制造的真正技术细节感兴趣,可以去读读埃里克·德雷克斯勒的《纳米系统:分子机械、制造与计算》。这本书的大部分内容都可以在作者的网站上免费阅读:http://e-drexler.com/d/06/00/Nanosystems/toc.html ,而且只要你懂怎么用 Google,你……

    If someone is interested in real technical description of molecular manufacturing, you may read Eric Drexler's "Nanosystems: Molecular Machinery, Manufacturing and Computation". Most parts of this book can be read on the author's website http://e-drexler.com/d/06/00/Nanosystems/toc.html , and if you know how to google you…

  • 我想说,在他写出《纳米系统》(Nanosystems)30 年后,装配器尖端方面没有任何进展。不过我仍然把那本书当作如何谈论高级自动制造系统的范本。生命的例子表明这是可能的……

    I would say 30 years after he wrote Nanosystems there hasn’t been any progress on the tip of the assembler. I still use that book as a model though for how to talk about advanced automatic manufacturing systems. The example of life shows it is possible…

正在加载完整评论……

键盘快捷键

/
聚焦搜索框
j / k
下一本 / 上一本
Enter
打开选中的书
Esc
关闭 / 返回
g h
回到首页
g b
值得读精选
g t
历史总榜
g r
上升最快
g l
我的书架
?
显示本帮助