《心灵的概念》封面

心灵的概念

The concept of mind

Gilbert Ryle · 初版 1949 年

4人推荐
10位读者提及
10次提及

为什么值得读

  • 直观阐释身心相互作用二元论所面临的理论缺陷
  • 带来诸多启发性见解,适合作为深入探究的阶梯

Hacker News 上怎么说

  • ……道德(我推荐牛津哲学文本版)维特根斯坦:《哲学研究》(超级、超级难,但收获巨大)几本当代著作:吉尔伯特·赖尔:《心的概念》(The Concept of Mind)威拉德·范·奥曼·蒯因:《从逻辑的观点看》J·L·麦基:《伦理学:发明对与错》托马斯·内格尔:《致命问题》(短篇散文,写得好,非常通俗易懂)伯纳德·威廉姆斯:……

    …Morals (I recommend the Oxford Philosophical Texts editions) Wittgenstein: Philosophical Investigations (terribly, terribly difficult, but very rewarding) A few contemporary things: Gilbert Ryle: The Concept of Mind Willard Van Orman Quine: From a Logical Point of View J. L. Mackie: Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong Thomas Nagel: Mortal Questions (short essays, well-written, very accessible) Bernard Williams:…

  • 你说的是笛卡尔的二元论吗?你读过吉尔伯特·赖尔 1949 年的《心的概念》[0] 吗?这已经是个非常陈旧过时的论调了。你似乎支持的那种形式在哲学界早就失宠了。要想直观地理解为什么相互作用二元论是……

    Are you referring to Cartesian dualism? Have you read Gilbert Ryle's "The Concept of Mind" (1949) [0]? This is a very old and tired argument. The form you seem to be endorsing has fallen out of favor in philosophy circles. For an intuitive understanding of why interactionist dualism is…

  • ……以前从没这样过,也不知道今天是什么驱使我去试试。真没白看!几乎每个帖子都有之前没讨论过的新想法。一个直接的收获是:读一读赖尔的《心的概念》似乎是进一步深入这个话题的不错选择。

    …before and don't know what compelled me to try today. It was rewarding! Pretty much every thread had new ideas not discussed in previous threads. One quick takeaway: it seems like reading Ryle's The Concept of Mind is a good next step for going deeper on this topic.

  • 赖尔的《心的概念》,罗森布鲁姆的《On Minds》

    concept of mind by ryle on minds by rosenbloom

  • ……克劳塞维茨的原则;他还必须有能力应用它们。”“知道如何应用原则不能被还原为、也不能推导自对这些或任何其他原则的接受。”——吉尔伯特·赖尔,《心的概念》(1949)。在彼得·诺尔的《编程即理论构建》中看到引用后,我几周前开始读这本书,他的这个特定观点不断在各种语境下浮现:……

    …principles of Clausewitz; he must also be competent to apply them.” “Knowing how to apply maxims cannot be reduced to, or derived from, the acceptance of those or any other maxims.” — Ryle, Gilbert. The Concept of Mind (1949) I started reading this a couple of weeks ago after seeing it referenced in Peter Naur’s “Programming as Theory Building”, and this point of his in particular keeps coming up in all sorts of contexts:…

  • 所以这是在玩“吉尔伯特·赖尔:《心的概念》”的梗吗?但这只是把大学换成早餐,把他的第一个例子重复了一遍而已……“第一个例子是一个参观牛津的访客。据报道,访客在参观了学院和图书馆后询问……

    So is it a joke on "Gilbert Ryle: The Concept of Mind"? But it just reiterates his first example using breakfast instead of university... 'The first example is of a visitor to Oxford. The visitor, upon viewing the colleges and library, reportedly inquired…

正在加载完整评论……

键盘快捷键

/
聚焦搜索框
j / k
下一本 / 上一本
Enter
打开选中的书
Esc
关闭 / 返回
g h
回到首页
g b
值得读精选
g t
历史总榜
g r
上升最快
g l
我的书架
?
显示本帮助