《科学与方法》封面

科学与方法

Science and Method

Henri Poincaré · 初版 1908 年

3人推荐
5位读者提及
8次提及

Hacker News 上怎么说

  • 博文作者提到的正是庞加莱的书《科学与方法》(1908年,法文原名《Science et méthode》)。在我看来,庞加莱的这本书非常有价值,对任何需要处理……的人都很有用。

    "Science and Method" (1908, "Science et méthode" -original title in French-) is Poincaré's book the blog post author is speaking about. In my opinion, Poincaré's book is very valuable, and useful for anyone dealing with…

  • ……并非绝对的好或绝对的坏。人性包含了如此多的灰色地带(正如美国人或者……我不知道……英语世界的人所说的那样),它并不是非黑即白的。第二本是昂利·庞加莱的《科学与方法》。我还没有达到能完全理解并领会这本书的水平,但我只想分享我读到时让我印象深刻的几句摘录[0]:“潜意识自我是绝不……

    …not absolutely good or absolutely bad. Human character consists of so many gray areas (as americans or... I don't know... english-speaking world puts it), it's not like black/white. The second one is Science and Method by Henri Poincare. I'm not in a position to fully understand and appreciate this book, but I just want to share a few quotes[0] that stood out for me when I read it: "The subliminal ego is in no way…

  • 以防你还没读过,推荐看看昂利·庞加莱的《科学与方法》——https://archive.org/details/sciencemethod00poinuoft 这里有一份内容摘要——https://thetelos.org/science-and-method-science-et-methode-h... 这里有一个视频讨论——https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQ-t8-igDZo……

    In case you haven't read it; see "Science and Method by Henri Poincare" - https://archive.org/details/sciencemethod00poinuoft Here is a summary - https://thetelos.org/science-and-method-science-et-methode-h... Here is a video discussion - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQ-t8-igDZo…

  • 这纯粹是毫无意义的废话。去读读庞加莱《科学与方法》中关于“偶然(Chance)”那一章吧,链接在这——https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49743377 随机性/偶然性本身就服从某些定律,我们可以借助这些定律来估计其边界。从某种意义上说,一切皆是偶然,因为决定论的……

    This is just meaningless twaddle. Read the chapter on "Chance" in Poincare's "Science and Method" linked to here - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49743377 Randomness/Chance itself is amenable to laws by which we can estimate its bounds. In one sense everything is chance since the deterministic…

  • 陶哲轩的文章让我想起了庞加莱 1908 年出版的《科学与方法》一书,书中解释了如何在漫长的时间跨度里拆解和攻克大型任务/难题。

    Tao's article reminds me Poincaré's "Science and Method" book (1908) where it is explained how to split/address big tasks/problems over long periods of time.

  • ……(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henri_Poincar%C3%A9 以及 https://henripoincarepapers.univ-nantes.fr/en/)写过三部科学哲学著作;即:1)《科学与假设》2)《科学的价值》以及 3)《科学与方法》。它们合订出版,取了一个恰如其分的名字《科学的基础》,可以在这里获取——https://www.gutenberg.org/files/39713/39713-h/39713-h.htm 以及这里(电子书版本)——https://archive.org/details/foundationsscie01poingoog……

    …(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henri_Poincar%C3%A9 and https://henripoincarepapers.univ-nantes.fr/en/) wrote three philosophy of science books; viz. 1) Science and Hypothesis 2) The Value of Science and 3) Science and Method. These were published together under the apt title, The Foundations of Science which is available here - https://www.gutenberg.org/files/39713/39713-h/39713-h.htm and here (ebook versions) - https://archive.org/details/foundationsscie01poingoog…

正在加载完整评论……

键盘快捷键

/
聚焦搜索框
j / k
下一本 / 上一本
Enter
打开选中的书
Esc
关闭 / 返回
g h
回到首页
g b
值得读精选
g t
历史总榜
g r
上升最快
g l
我的书架
?
显示本帮助