在英国，任何人都可以因为任何内容被起诉诽谤，哪怕全英国只有一个人读过。Rachel Ehrenfeld 就曾因为写了《Funding Evil: How Terrorism is Financed and How to Stop It》而在英国被 Khalid bin Mahfouz 成功起诉，可这本书根本就没在英国出版过。当时只是有线上书商把 23 本书寄到了英国，这就足以让英国主张管辖权了。……
Anyone can be sued for libel in Britain for any content that is read by even one person in Britain. Rachel Ehrenfeld was successfully sued in Britain by Khalid bin Mahfouz for writing Funding Evil: How Terrorism is Financed and How to Stop It, a book that was never published in Britain. 23 copies had been shipped to Britain by online booksellers, which was enough for Britain to claim jurisdiction.…
…message that offends his or her sensibilities, and a UK-based server is involved in the routing, as I understand it, the author could still be sued. This also does nothing about something like the case of Funding Evil by Rachel Ehrenfeld ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Funding_Evil#Libel_controversy ), in which 23 copies of the book ordered through "web sites registered in the UK" were deemed sufficient for the law…
…Speech Protection Act of 2009 (H.R.1304, 111th Congress).[3]: 22 > It was inspired by the legal battle that ensued between Dr. Rachel Ehrenfeld and Saudi businessman Khalid bin Mahfouz over her 2003 book Funding Evil.[4] Just to make it even clearer: "Libel tourism" basically means taking your case to British courts, which are hilariously pro-plaintiff when it comes to libel. That's what happened with Ehrenfeld.
在英国，任何人都可以因为任何内容被起诉诽谤，哪怕全英国只有一个人读过。Rachel Ehrenfeld 就曾因为写了《Funding Evil: How Terrorism is Financed and How to Stop It》而在英国被 Khalid bin Mahfouz 成功起诉，可这本书根本就没在英国出版过。当时只是有线上书商把 23 本书寄到了英国，这就足以让英国主张管辖权了。……
Anyone can be sued for libel in Britain for any content that is read by even one person in Britain. Rachel Ehrenfeld was successfully sued in Britain by Khalid bin Mahfouz for writing Funding Evil: How Terrorism is Financed and How to Stop It, a book that was never published in Britain. 23 copies had been shipped to Britain by online booksellers, which was enough for Britain to claim jurisdiction.…
……带有冒犯其情感的信息，并且路由中经过了一台位于英国的服务器，据我所知，作者仍然可以被起诉。这也改变不了类似 Rachel Ehrenfeld 的《Funding Evil》案件（http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Funding_Evil#Libel_controversy），当时通过“在英国注册的网站”订购了 23 本书，就被认为足以让法律……
…message that offends his or her sensibilities, and a UK-based server is involved in the routing, as I understand it, the author could still be sued. This also does nothing about something like the case of Funding Evil by Rachel Ehrenfeld ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Funding_Evil#Libel_controversy ), in which 23 copies of the book ordered through "web sites registered in the UK" were deemed sufficient for the law…
……2009 年《Speech Protection Act》（第 111 届国会，H.R.1304）。[3]: 22 > 该法案的灵感来自 Rachel Ehrenfeld 博士与沙特商人 Khalid bin Mahfouz 之间围绕她 2003 年出版的书《Funding Evil》展开的法律诉讼。[4] 简单解释一下：“诽谤诉讼旅游（Libel tourism）”基本上就是指把案子捅到英国法院去打，因为英国法院在诽谤案上简直偏袒原告偏袒得搞笑。Ehrenfeld 当时遇到的就是这档子事。
…Speech Protection Act of 2009 (H.R.1304, 111th Congress).[3]: 22 > It was inspired by the legal battle that ensued between Dr. Rachel Ehrenfeld and Saudi businessman Khalid bin Mahfouz over her 2003 book Funding Evil.[4] Just to make it even clearer: "Libel tourism" basically means taking your case to British courts, which are hilariously pro-plaintiff when it comes to libel. That's what happened with Ehrenfeld.