> 我一直以为在历史上，精英学校就是给精英子弟上的；有钱的家长送孩子上大学，就是为了让他们比底层阶级高出一截。《The Screwing Of The Average Man》[0] 让我意识到了这点。它还指出，二战老兵退伍后，政府通过《GI Bill》[1] 给他们补贴上大学，好让他们有事可做、不至于去惹事打架。这导致了……
> I always thought that historically, the elite schools were for the children of the elite; Parents of means sent their children to College so they'd have a leg up on the under-class. The Screwing Of The Average Man [0] pointed this out to me. It additionally pointed out that college was subsidized for returning WWII soldiers so they'd have something to do that didn't involve fighting, via the GI Bill [1]. This had…
在我堆积如山的书里，某处放着一本 David Hapgood 写的《The Screwing of the Average Man》[1]。其中有一章指出，大学最初是有钱家长送孩子去的地方，好让他们的后代比底层人更有优势。当……
Somewhere in my stacks of books there's a copy of "The Screwing of the Average Man", by David Hapgood [1]. One of the chapters points out that College was originally something wealthy parents to send their children to, so that their offspring would have a leg up on the underclass. When…
> 如果 3-4 个人竞聘一个岗位，其中 1-2 个人有文凭，那直接无视另外两个人是相当合理的决定。多年前我在一家二手店淘到了《The Screwing of the Average Man》。根据 Hapgood 先生的说法，能优先获得工作机会一直以来都是富裕家庭送孩子上大学的原因。二战后，无产阶级促使国会……
> If 3-4 people apply for a single position and 1-2 of them have a degree, then it's a fairly reasonable decision to ignore the other two. Years ago I found a copy of "The Screwing of the Average Man" at a thrift shop. According to Mr. Hapgood, getting preferential consideration for jobs was always the reason wealthy families sent their children to college. After WWII the proletariat class got congress…
> “现在有太多的四年制大学服务了太多的学生，而在《The Screwing of the Average Man》[0] 中提到，大学曾经是上流社会送孩子去镀金、好比‘没受过教育’的大众更有优势的手段。后来国会出台了《GI Bill》，为二战……提供大学学费补贴
> "There are too many four-year colleges serving too many students, The Screwing of the Average Man [0] said that college used to be something the upper-class sent their children to so they'd have a leg up on the "uneducated" masses. Then the congress provided the GI Bill to subsidize college for WWII…
> 我一直以为在历史上，精英学校就是给精英子弟上的；有钱的家长送孩子上大学，就是为了让他们比底层阶级高出一截。《The Screwing Of The Average Man》[0] 让我意识到了这点。它还指出，二战老兵退伍后，政府通过《GI Bill》[1] 给他们补贴上大学，好让他们有事可做、不至于去惹事打架。这导致了……
> I always thought that historically, the elite schools were for the children of the elite; Parents of means sent their children to College so they'd have a leg up on the under-class. The Screwing Of The Average Man [0] pointed this out to me. It additionally pointed out that college was subsidized for returning WWII soldiers so they'd have something to do that didn't involve fighting, via the GI Bill [1]. This had…
《The Screwing of the Average Man》
The Screwing of the Average Man
在我堆积如山的书里，某处放着一本 David Hapgood 写的《The Screwing of the Average Man》[1]。其中有一章指出，大学最初是有钱家长送孩子去的地方，好让他们的后代比底层人更有优势。当……
Somewhere in my stacks of books there's a copy of "The Screwing of the Average Man", by David Hapgood [1]. One of the chapters points out that College was originally something wealthy parents to send their children to, so that their offspring would have a leg up on the underclass. When…
> 如果 3-4 个人竞聘一个岗位，其中 1-2 个人有文凭，那直接无视另外两个人是相当合理的决定。多年前我在一家二手店淘到了《The Screwing of the Average Man》。根据 Hapgood 先生的说法，能优先获得工作机会一直以来都是富裕家庭送孩子上大学的原因。二战后，无产阶级促使国会……
> If 3-4 people apply for a single position and 1-2 of them have a degree, then it's a fairly reasonable decision to ignore the other two. Years ago I found a copy of "The Screwing of the Average Man" at a thrift shop. According to Mr. Hapgood, getting preferential consideration for jobs was always the reason wealthy families sent their children to college. After WWII the proletariat class got congress…
> “现在有太多的四年制大学服务了太多的学生，而在《The Screwing of the Average Man》[0] 中提到，大学曾经是上流社会送孩子去镀金、好比‘没受过教育’的大众更有优势的手段。后来国会出台了《GI Bill》，为二战……提供大学学费补贴
> "There are too many four-year colleges serving too many students, The Screwing of the Average Man [0] said that college used to be something the upper-class sent their children to so they'd have a leg up on the "uneducated" masses. Then the congress provided the GI Bill to subsidize college for WWII…