形式综合论

Hacker News 上怎么说

• larve · 2022 年

  ……算法。在很多方面都极具前瞻性。- 理查德·加布里尔的《软件的模式》，虽然不是直接讲计算机的，但我从中获得了很多深刻的洞见。它还引申让我读了下一本：- 克里斯托弗·亚历山大的《形式综合论》，这本身不算计算机书，但直击系统架构的核心。即便在它本身的领域，这本书也称得上惊世骇俗。- 迈克尔的《所有 Mathematica 指南》……

  …algorithm. Very prescient in many ways. - Patterns of Software - Richard Gabriel Not directly about computing, but I got a lot of deep insights from this book. It also brought me to the next book: - Notes on the synthesis of form - Christopher Alexander This is not a computing book per se, but it goes to the core of system architecture. Even in its original field, this book is kind of wild. - All Mathematica Guidebooks - Michael…

• martian · 2009 年

  我向所有人推荐《形式综合论》。一方面，它读起来非常让人愉悦（亚历山大是个语言大师），另一方面，对于任何思考构建大型系统、尤其是软件系统的人来说，都极具启发。最大的收获是……

  I recommend Notes on the Synthesis of Form to everyone. For one, it's a delightful read (Alexander is a master linguist), but it's also tremendously helpful for anyone thinking about building a large system, especially software. The main takeaway…

• akkartik · 2015 年

  在大家推荐克里斯托弗·亚历山大的书单里，我还要加上《形式综合论》。以我个人拙见，这是他写得最好的一本书，但自从理查德·加布里尔把它评价为“少作”之后，就一直被低估了：https://www.dreamsongs.com/Essays.html

  To all the Christopher Alexander recommendations I'll add Notes on the Synthesis of Form. It's his best book in my not-so-humble opinion, and it's been under-rated ever since Richard Gabriel called it 'juvenalia': https://www.dreamsongs.com/Essays.html

• fsloth · 2019 年

  泥屋是一种很了不起的建筑。用唾手可得的资源就能轻松盖起来，它的系统原理一目了然，自己一个人就能搭，坏了也能自己修。克里斯托弗·亚历山大的《形式综合论》是一本极好的书，里面还引用了好几句马文·明斯基的话，完全可以把它当成本土技术哲学的入门书来读——以及基于传统的设计是如何……

  Mud hut is an awesome building. It's easily constructed from easily available resources, it's systems are easy to reason out, it's easy to build by yourself and it's easy to repair yourself. "Notes on the synthesis of form" by Christopher Alexander is a wonderfull book, and including several Marvin Minsky quotes it can be read as an introduction to the philosophy of vernacular technology - and how tradition based design…

• hcarvalhoalves · 2013 年

  ……它（“艺术”）。功能在根本上是与形式不可分割的，所以一个设计糟糕的产品绝不能说它好看。它只是在适用度上有高低之分。我强烈推荐阅读克里斯托弗·亚历山大的《形式综合论》。它可能会颠覆你对“设计”的认知。我觉得这个词经常被人挂在嘴边，但很少有人真正明白它背后意味着什么。

  …it ("art"). Function is fundamentally undetachable from form, so a poorly designed product can't truly be said to look good. It can just have varying degrees of fitness. I highly recommend reading "Notes on the synthesis of form" by Christopher Alexander. It might blown your mind on what you consider design. I feel this word is tossed around a lot but few realize what it can entail.

• hcarvalhoalves · 2013 年

  克里斯托弗·亚历山大的《形式综合论》[1]以及他后来的作品，深刻改变了我思考问题和看待世界的方式。[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Notes_on_the_Synthesis_of_Form

  Notes on the synthesis of form by Christopher Alexander [1], and subsequent works, deeply changed how I approach problems and perceive the world. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Notes_on_the_Synthesis_of_Form

正在加载完整评论……