混沌的本质
The essence of chaos
Edward N. Lorenz · 初版 1993 年
1人推荐
2位读者提及
4次提及
近年来，混沌系统的研究已成为一门重要的科学探索，为气候学和力学等截然不同的领域中所观察到的表面上的随机行为提供了深刻见解。在《The Essence of Chaos》一书中，混沌学创始人之一、开创性概念“蝴蝶效应”的提出者 Edward Lorenz 展现了他对该领域当前认知的独到图景。Lorenz 列举了混沌行为的日常实例，例如抛硬币、弹珠的运行轨迹、树叶的飘落，并用初等数学原理解释了它们本质上混
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
……https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rsta.201... 任何想扎实入门流体动力学中混沌概念的人，都应该去读读最初发现这一现象的研究者爱德华·洛伦兹（Ed Lorenz）的著作《混沌的本质》（The Essence of Chaos, 1995）。https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/154291.The_Essence_of_Ch...
…https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rsta.201... Anyone wanting a solid introduction to the notion of chaos in fluid dynamics should look at work of the original researcher who discovered the phenomenon, Ed Lorenz (1995) The Essence of Chaos. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/154291.The_Essence_of_Ch...
……20世纪50年代的人工影响天气计划，是在爱德华·洛伦兹发现天气系统对初始条件的敏感依赖性（俗称“混沌”）之前启动的。他1995年写的那本《混沌的本质》至今仍是该领域最好的概述：https://uwapress.uw.edu/book/9780295975146/the-essence-of-ch... J·R·弗莱明（JR Fleming）2010年的书《操控天空：人工影响天气和气候的曲折历史》（Fixing the Sky: The Checkered History of Weather and Climate…
…modification programs of the 1950s were iniated before the discovery of sensitive dependence on initial conditions (popularly known as 'chaos') in weather systems, by Edward Lorenz. His 1995 book, "The Essence of Chaos" is still the best overview of the subject: https://uwapress.uw.edu/book/9780295975146/the-essence-of-ch... The 2010 book by JR Fleming, "Fixing the Sky: The Checkered History of Weather and Climate…
……非线性现象驱动的涨落。这些系统表现出对初始条件的敏感依赖性。哪怕随便做点微不足道的调研本来也能搞明白这一点。去读读爱德华·洛伦兹1995年的《混沌的本质》吧。https://uwapress.uw.edu/book/9780295975146/the-essence-of-ch... 这真是无知又谬误得令人尴尬。典型的某个领域的专家对另一领域正在发生的事情一无所知的案例……
…fluctuations driven by non-linear phenomena. These are systems that display sensitive depenence to initial condition. Even a trivial research effort should have revealed this. Go read Edward Lorenz 1995 Essence of Chaos. https://uwapress.uw.edu/book/9780295975146/the-essence-of-ch... This is really embarrassingly ignorant and incorrect. Classic case of experts in one field having no idea of what's been going on in…
我挺好奇你是不是更喜欢洛伦兹的那本书（《混沌的本质》）。作为一个完全没资格评价这两本书的人，我很想听听更懂这行的人的看法。
I'm curious if you liked Lorenz's book more (The Essence of Chaos). As someone woefully unqualified to critique either, I'd be interested in the opinion of someone closer to the subject matter.