……是世界上最重要的哲学家，答案很可能都会是“柏格森”。我认为在 2013 年的今天，他依然有很多话值得我们深思。建议先读他的《Introduction to Metaphysics》，然后再读《Matter and Memory》。多谢这次交流，Steve，非常有意思。
…was the most important philosopher in the world likely the answer would have been 'Bergson.' I think he still has a lot to say to us in 2013. I'd start with his Introduction to Metaphysics and then to Matter and Memory. Thanks for the exchange Steve, very fun stuff.
……无论是在宇宙中还是在柏格森先生的著作里，都没有任何理由去接受这种观点。”——伯特兰·罗素。为什么会有人觉得他有资格讨论物理学？柏格森写了一本叫《Matter and Memory》[2]的书，还有他的论文《Time and Free Will》[3]，在里面他对“时间”提出了一种极度主观且基本上毫无意义的描述。就像其他人说的那样，可悲的是他这种伪知识分子的胡乱攻击……
…whatever for accepting this view, either in the universe or in the writings of M. Bergson. " -Bertrand Russell Why would anyone think he was qualified to discuss physics? Bergson wrote a book called "Matter and Memory"[2] and his thesis, Time and Free Will[3], where he presented a highly subjective and basically meaningless account of "time." Like others have said, it's sad that his pseudo-intellectual rock throwing…
……关注相似性或品质；它很少关心个体差异。我们可以推测，动物的感知在大多数情况下仅限于这种对有用性的辨识。”——柏格森《Matter and Memory》。我们在宏观上了解和理解的局限，限制了我们与世界的接触和感知。我们总不能生活在一个数字世界里，却对周围环境中的 recursion 和 graph 视而不见吧。
…to the resemblance or quality; it cares little for individual differences. To this discernment of the useful we may surmise that the perception of animals is, in most cases, confined." - Bergson from Matter and Memory Constraints on what we broadly know and understand are constraints on our contact and perception of the world. We can't live in a digital world and be blind to the recursions and graphs in the furniture.
……是世界上最重要的哲学家，答案很可能都会是“柏格森”。我认为在 2013 年的今天，他依然有很多话值得我们深思。建议先读他的《Introduction to Metaphysics》，然后再读《Matter and Memory》。多谢这次交流，Steve，非常有意思。
…was the most important philosopher in the world likely the answer would have been 'Bergson.' I think he still has a lot to say to us in 2013. I'd start with his Introduction to Metaphysics and then to Matter and Memory. Thanks for the exchange Steve, very fun stuff.
……无论是在宇宙中还是在柏格森先生的著作里，都没有任何理由去接受这种观点。”——伯特兰·罗素。为什么会有人觉得他有资格讨论物理学？柏格森写了一本叫《Matter and Memory》[2]的书，还有他的论文《Time and Free Will》[3]，在里面他对“时间”提出了一种极度主观且基本上毫无意义的描述。就像其他人说的那样，可悲的是他这种伪知识分子的胡乱攻击……
…whatever for accepting this view, either in the universe or in the writings of M. Bergson. " -Bertrand Russell Why would anyone think he was qualified to discuss physics? Bergson wrote a book called "Matter and Memory"[2] and his thesis, Time and Free Will[3], where he presented a highly subjective and basically meaningless account of "time." Like others have said, it's sad that his pseudo-intellectual rock throwing…
……关注相似性或品质；它很少关心个体差异。我们可以推测，动物的感知在大多数情况下仅限于这种对有用性的辨识。”——柏格森《Matter and Memory》。我们在宏观上了解和理解的局限，限制了我们与世界的接触和感知。我们总不能生活在一个数字世界里，却对周围环境中的 recursion 和 graph 视而不见吧。
…to the resemblance or quality; it cares little for individual differences. To this discernment of the useful we may surmise that the perception of animals is, in most cases, confined." - Bergson from Matter and Memory Constraints on what we broadly know and understand are constraints on our contact and perception of the world. We can't live in a digital world and be blind to the recursions and graphs in the furniture.