……演化算法应用到二维“适应度地形”），出自 Eric Beinhocker 的《The Origin of Wealth》（财富的起源） - http://www.amazon.com/Origin-Wealth-Evolution-Complexity-Eco... 绝对是对复杂性经济学（complexity economics）极其震撼的探索。
…evolutionary algorithms to a 2-dimensional "fitness landscape") in The Origin of Wealth by Eric Beinhocker - http://www.amazon.com/Origin-Wealth-Evolution-Complexity-Eco... Absolutely phenomenal exploration of complexity economics.
……像其前身一样的模型，凯恩斯很有洞察力，马克思的阶级意识也自有其价值，但想要彻底理解并解决眼下的问题，目光必须放得更宽。MMT（现代货币理论）、W. Brian Arthur 的复杂性经济学，以及 Steve Keen 统一资本、劳动力、阶级与能源的研究，会是个很好的起点。
…model like its progenitor, Keynes was insightful, and that Marx's class-consciousness has merits, full understanding and remedy for present concerns must look further afield. MMT, W. Brian Arthur's complexity economics, and Steve Keen's work unifying capital, labour, class, and energy would be a good start.
……内生增长[2]，以及将经济建模为一个复杂自适应系统[3]。归根结底，他的理论可能对也可能不对，但我读这本书在经济学上学到了巨多东西，如果研究“复杂性经济学”[4]的那帮人是对的，那这会有非常耐人寻味的含义。就我个人而言，我觉得搞 CE 那帮人八成切中要害了，但光是为了书里展现的关于……的历史教训，这本书就值得一读。
…endogenous growth[2], and modeling the economy as a complex adaptive system[3]. In the end, his theories may or may not be correct, but I've learned a TON about economics from reading this book, and if the "Complexity Economics"[4] guys are right, it has some interesting implications. Personally, I suspect that the CE folks are onto something, but this book is worth reading just for the history lesson it presents, vis-a-vis…
复杂性经济学。我一直在疯狂恶补这方面的主题书籍，同时也和一位同事通过邮件交流。书单：_已读完_ 《The Origin of Wealth: The Radical Remaking of Economics and What it Means for…》
Complexity Economics I've been binging books on the topic as well as exchanging dialogs with a colleague over email. Books list: _Completed_ The Origin of Wealth: The Radical Remaking of Economics and What it Means for…
……不确定最近这类研究进展如何。但 Eric Beinhocker 的《The Origin of Wealth》里重点提到了 Sugarscape，书中描绘了这样一幅图景：认同“复杂性经济学”[2]的经济学家往往更乐意采用仿真模拟。事实上，维基百科对复杂性经济学的描述是：复杂性经济学是把复杂性科学应用于经济学问题。……
…sure what the most recent such work is. But Sugarscape was mentioned quite prominently in Eric Beinhocker's The Origin of Wealth, which paints a picture where economists who associate themselves with "Complexity Economics"[2] are more amenable to simulation. And, indeed, the description of Complexity Economics from Wikipedia reads: Complexity economics is the application of complexity science to the problems of economics.…
……William Ophuls（尤其是《Ecology & Plato》，而且一定要深挖他的参考书目）、Bernhard J. Stern（《Resistances to Technological Innovation》）、Robert Gordon（《Rise & Fall》）、W. Brian Arthur（《Technology & complexity economics》）、Robert U. Ayres（主要看能源与经济方向）、M. King Hubbert、Howard & Eugene Odum、Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen（《Entropy》）、Peter Turchin、Meadows 等人、John Nicholas Gray（特别是关于 Pinker 的内容）、Norbert Wiener……
…William Ophuls (esp. Ecology & Plato, and mine the hell out of his bibliogs), Bernhard J. Stern ("Resistances to Technological Innovation"), Robert Gordon (Rise & Fall), W. Brian Arthur (Technology & complexity economics), Robert U. Ayres (generally, energy & econ), M. King Hubbert, Howard & Eugene Odum, Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen (Entropy), Peter Turchin, Meadows et al, John Nicholas Gray (esp. on Pinker), Norbert Wiener…
……演化算法应用到二维“适应度地形”），出自 Eric Beinhocker 的《The Origin of Wealth》（财富的起源） - http://www.amazon.com/Origin-Wealth-Evolution-Complexity-Eco... 绝对是对复杂性经济学（complexity economics）极其震撼的探索。
…evolutionary algorithms to a 2-dimensional "fitness landscape") in The Origin of Wealth by Eric Beinhocker - http://www.amazon.com/Origin-Wealth-Evolution-Complexity-Eco... Absolutely phenomenal exploration of complexity economics.
……像其前身一样的模型，凯恩斯很有洞察力，马克思的阶级意识也自有其价值，但想要彻底理解并解决眼下的问题，目光必须放得更宽。MMT（现代货币理论）、W. Brian Arthur 的复杂性经济学，以及 Steve Keen 统一资本、劳动力、阶级与能源的研究，会是个很好的起点。
…model like its progenitor, Keynes was insightful, and that Marx's class-consciousness has merits, full understanding and remedy for present concerns must look further afield. MMT, W. Brian Arthur's complexity economics, and Steve Keen's work unifying capital, labour, class, and energy would be a good start.
……内生增长[2]，以及将经济建模为一个复杂自适应系统[3]。归根结底，他的理论可能对也可能不对，但我读这本书在经济学上学到了巨多东西，如果研究“复杂性经济学”[4]的那帮人是对的，那这会有非常耐人寻味的含义。就我个人而言，我觉得搞 CE 那帮人八成切中要害了，但光是为了书里展现的关于……的历史教训，这本书就值得一读。
…endogenous growth[2], and modeling the economy as a complex adaptive system[3]. In the end, his theories may or may not be correct, but I've learned a TON about economics from reading this book, and if the "Complexity Economics"[4] guys are right, it has some interesting implications. Personally, I suspect that the CE folks are onto something, but this book is worth reading just for the history lesson it presents, vis-a-vis…
复杂性经济学。我一直在疯狂恶补这方面的主题书籍，同时也和一位同事通过邮件交流。书单：_已读完_ 《The Origin of Wealth: The Radical Remaking of Economics and What it Means for…》
Complexity Economics I've been binging books on the topic as well as exchanging dialogs with a colleague over email. Books list: _Completed_ The Origin of Wealth: The Radical Remaking of Economics and What it Means for…
……不确定最近这类研究进展如何。但 Eric Beinhocker 的《The Origin of Wealth》里重点提到了 Sugarscape，书中描绘了这样一幅图景：认同“复杂性经济学”[2]的经济学家往往更乐意采用仿真模拟。事实上，维基百科对复杂性经济学的描述是：复杂性经济学是把复杂性科学应用于经济学问题。……
…sure what the most recent such work is. But Sugarscape was mentioned quite prominently in Eric Beinhocker's The Origin of Wealth, which paints a picture where economists who associate themselves with "Complexity Economics"[2] are more amenable to simulation. And, indeed, the description of Complexity Economics from Wikipedia reads: Complexity economics is the application of complexity science to the problems of economics.…
……William Ophuls（尤其是《Ecology & Plato》，而且一定要深挖他的参考书目）、Bernhard J. Stern（《Resistances to Technological Innovation》）、Robert Gordon（《Rise & Fall》）、W. Brian Arthur（《Technology & complexity economics》）、Robert U. Ayres（主要看能源与经济方向）、M. King Hubbert、Howard & Eugene Odum、Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen（《Entropy》）、Peter Turchin、Meadows 等人、John Nicholas Gray（特别是关于 Pinker 的内容）、Norbert Wiener……
…William Ophuls (esp. Ecology & Plato, and mine the hell out of his bibliogs), Bernhard J. Stern ("Resistances to Technological Innovation"), Robert Gordon (Rise & Fall), W. Brian Arthur (Technology & complexity economics), Robert U. Ayres (generally, energy & econ), M. King Hubbert, Howard & Eugene Odum, Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen (Entropy), Peter Turchin, Meadows et al, John Nicholas Gray (esp. on Pinker), Norbert Wiener…