……我倒不觉得 CS 里的一切都是从二进制构建起来的。这与计算机方面的专长实在没什么特别的联系（或者说具备这种专长也没啥优势）。最近有两本关于量子场论（QFT）的通俗读物：Matt Strassler 的《Waves in an Impossible Sea》（没有数学，全是指手画脚式的类比）：https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CB3LZXR9/；Sean Carroll 的《Quanta and Fields》（试图让你对真正的数学有个基础理解）：https://www.amazon.com/dp/0593186605/
…wouldn't say that that everything builds up from binary in CS. There is really no particular relation to (or benefits of having) computer expertise. Two recent popular books about QFT are: Matt Strassler’s Waves in an Impossible Sea (no math, just hand-wavy analogies): https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CB3LZXR9/ Sean Carroll’s Quanta and Fields (tries to give you a basic understanding of the actual math): https://www.amazon.com/dp/0593186605/
Matt Strassler 写的《Waves in an Impossible Sea》这本书深入浅出地解释了这一点。https://profmattstrassler.com/waves-in-an-impossible-sea/
The book Waves in an Impossible Sea by Matt Strassler goes deep into explaining precisely this. https://profmattstrassler.com/waves-in-an-impossible-sea/
《Waves in an Impossible Sea》这本书在这一点上确实讲得挺深的（针对门外汉而言——我就是外行），并且试图强调一个观点：人们可以采取两种视角。一种是介质的视角，另一种是……
The book Waves in an Impossible Sea really goes into some depth on this (for a layman -- which I am) and tries to drive home the point that there are two perspectives one might take. There's the perspective of the medium and the perspective…
这里跟最近出现的另一个话题有点关联：对 Matt Strassler 新书《Waves in an Impossible Sea》的书评[1]。Strassler 教授说写这本书的一大动机是他所谓的“phibs”：那些被阉割得面目全非的物理“解释”，它们不仅毫无信息量，而且至少是有误导性的，甚至……
There's an association here to another topic which came up recently: a review of Matt Strassler's new book, Waves in an Impossible Sea [1]. Professor Strassler says a big motivation for writing this book was what he calls 'phibs': 'explanations' of physics so bowdlerized that they are not just uninformative, but at least misleading and…
……我倒不觉得 CS 里的一切都是从二进制构建起来的。这与计算机方面的专长实在没什么特别的联系（或者说具备这种专长也没啥优势）。最近有两本关于量子场论（QFT）的通俗读物：Matt Strassler 的《Waves in an Impossible Sea》（没有数学，全是指手画脚式的类比）：https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CB3LZXR9/；Sean Carroll 的《Quanta and Fields》（试图让你对真正的数学有个基础理解）：https://www.amazon.com/dp/0593186605/
…wouldn't say that that everything builds up from binary in CS. There is really no particular relation to (or benefits of having) computer expertise. Two recent popular books about QFT are: Matt Strassler’s Waves in an Impossible Sea (no math, just hand-wavy analogies): https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CB3LZXR9/ Sean Carroll’s Quanta and Fields (tries to give you a basic understanding of the actual math): https://www.amazon.com/dp/0593186605/
Matt Strassler 写的《Waves in an Impossible Sea》这本书深入浅出地解释了这一点。https://profmattstrassler.com/waves-in-an-impossible-sea/
The book Waves in an Impossible Sea by Matt Strassler goes deep into explaining precisely this. https://profmattstrassler.com/waves-in-an-impossible-sea/
如果你想深入了解当前的理论和实验，我建议你读读 Matt Strassler 的《Waves in an impossible sea》
If you want to learn more of about current theory and experiments I suggest you pick up “Waves in an impossible sea” by Matt Strassler
Strassler 通常比你见惯的普通科普作家更硬核、技术性更强。但他的《Waves in an impossible sea》这本书要好懂得多。
Strassler is usually more technical than your run-of-the-mill popsci writer. But his book "Waves in an impossible sea" is much more accessible.
《Waves in an Impossible Sea》这本书在这一点上确实讲得挺深的（针对门外汉而言——我就是外行），并且试图强调一个观点：人们可以采取两种视角。一种是介质的视角，另一种是……
The book Waves in an Impossible Sea really goes into some depth on this (for a layman -- which I am) and tries to drive home the point that there are two perspectives one might take. There's the perspective of the medium and the perspective…
这里跟最近出现的另一个话题有点关联：对 Matt Strassler 新书《Waves in an Impossible Sea》的书评[1]。Strassler 教授说写这本书的一大动机是他所谓的“phibs”：那些被阉割得面目全非的物理“解释”，它们不仅毫无信息量，而且至少是有误导性的，甚至……
There's an association here to another topic which came up recently: a review of Matt Strassler's new book, Waves in an Impossible Sea [1]. Professor Strassler says a big motivation for writing this book was what he calls 'phibs': 'explanations' of physics so bowdlerized that they are not just uninformative, but at least misleading and…