……斯宾诺莎的《神学政治论》（Tractatus Theologico-Politicus）+ 斯图尔特的《侍臣与异端》（The Courtier and the Heretic，关于斯宾诺莎和莱布尼茨）、休谟的《人类理解研究》（Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding）、康德的《道德形而上学奠基》（Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals）、康德的《任何一种能够作为科学出现的未来形而上学序论》（Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics）、密尔的《论自由》（On Liberty）、安斯康姆的《现代道德哲学》（Modern Moral Philosophy）、兰德的《什么是资本主义？》（What is Capitalism?）、斯特劳森的《意义的界限》（The Bounds of Sense）+ 内格尔的《罗尔斯论正义》（Rawls on Justice）、基切尔的《自然主义者的回归》（The Naturalists Return）、《规范性的来源》（Sources of Normativity）……
…Tractatus Theologico-Politicus, Spinoza + The Courtier and the Heretic, Stewart (on Spinoza and Leibniz) Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Hume Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, Kant Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, Kant On Liberty, Mill "Modern Moral Philosophy", Anscombe "What is Capitalism?", Rand The Bounds of Sense, Strawson + "Rawls on Justice", Nagel "The Naturalists Return", Kitcher Sources of Normativity,…
……不懂科学的哲学家。那是和伯特兰·罗素合著《数学原理》（Principia Mathematica）的天才作家兼数学家 A.N. 怀特海。2) 亚里士多德《形而上学》（The Metaphysics） 3) 康德《任何一种能够作为科学出现的未来形而上学序论》（Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics） 4) 大卫·休谟的《人性论》（A Treatise of Human Nature）和/或《人类理解研究》（An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding） 5) 尼采《快乐的科学》（The gay science，意思是“欢乐的科学”） 6) 路德维希·维特根斯坦《哲学研究》（Philosophical Investigations）……
…philosopher that doesn't understand science. That's the genius writer and mathematician A.N Whitehead that worked with Bertrand Russell on Principia Mathematica. 2) Aristotle, The Metaphysics 3) Kant, Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics 4) David Hume's: A Treatise of Human Nature and/or An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding 5) Nietchze, The gay science (meaning "the joyful science") 6) Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations…
……不过已经过了很久了。也许是时候重读一遍，然后再来读这本书了！对感兴趣的人来说，如果你不想深挖，结合这本书可以参考的两本源文本是：康德的《未来形而上学序论》（Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics）和叔本华的《作为意志和表象的世界》（The World as Will and Representation），它们都属于 public domain，而且就该学科主题而言相对容易理解且条理清晰。
…been a long time, though. Maybe it's time to reread and then pick up this book! For those interested, the two source texts to consider in light of this book if you don't want to dig too deep, Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics and Schopenhauer's The World as Will and Representation are both public domain and relatively accessible/clear for the subject matter.
这个问题挺难回答的。能让我成为更优秀思考者的书，必须是那些硬核的书 / 能让我发生改变的书。排名前两名的肯定是伊曼努尔·康德的《未来形而上学序论》（Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics）。虽说它据称是《纯粹理性批判》（Critique of Pure Reason）的通俗易懂版，但至少对我而言依然极其艰深且烧脑。在啃完这些内容之后，变容易的可不单单是哲学。……
This is a hard. Books that made me a better thinker have to be the hard ones / ones that made me change. Top two would be Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, Immanuel Kant. Supposedly more accessible version of Critique of Pure Reason but still very hard and mind-bending for me at least. Not just philosophy was easier after wrestling with this content. The…
……传统上属于哲学的一部分。实际上，哲学与形式科学（逻辑学、数学、统计学和理论计算机科学）之间并没有真正的边界。想想康德在《未来形而上学序论》（Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics）第 13 节中遇到的问题：两个内在相同的物体必然是可互换的。但有些物体在内在特征上完全相同，你却无法互换它们。康德是个了不起的哲学家，但他也被难住了……
…traditionally part of philosophy. In practice there is no real border between philosophy and formal sciences (logic, mathematics, statistics and theoretical computer science). Consider the problem Kant faced in Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, §13. Two objects that are intrinsically alike must be interchangeable. But there are objects that are intrinsically alike and you can't exchange them. Kant was incredible philosopher but he was thrown…
……把那句话放到语境里看很有意思：“我一直觉得自己早年的一大幸事，便是在十五岁左右时，在我父亲的藏书室里偶然发现了一本康德的《未来形而上学序论》（Prolegomena to any Future Metaphysics）。这本书在当时给我留下了强烈且不可磨灭的印象，此后我在任何哲学阅读中都未曾再体会过这种感觉。两三年后，那过剩的……
…It's interesting to put that quote in context: "I have always felt it as a stroke of good fortune that early in life, at about the age of fifteen, I lighted, in my fathers library, on a copy of Kant's Prolegomena to any Future Metaphysics. The book made at the time a powerful and inextinguishable impression on me, the like of which I never afterwards experienced in any of my philosophical reading. Some two or three years later the superfluity…
……斯宾诺莎的《神学政治论》（Tractatus Theologico-Politicus）+ 斯图尔特的《侍臣与异端》（The Courtier and the Heretic，关于斯宾诺莎和莱布尼茨）、休谟的《人类理解研究》（Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding）、康德的《道德形而上学奠基》（Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals）、康德的《任何一种能够作为科学出现的未来形而上学序论》（Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics）、密尔的《论自由》（On Liberty）、安斯康姆的《现代道德哲学》（Modern Moral Philosophy）、兰德的《什么是资本主义？》（What is Capitalism?）、斯特劳森的《意义的界限》（The Bounds of Sense）+ 内格尔的《罗尔斯论正义》（Rawls on Justice）、基切尔的《自然主义者的回归》（The Naturalists Return）、《规范性的来源》（Sources of Normativity）……
…Tractatus Theologico-Politicus, Spinoza + The Courtier and the Heretic, Stewart (on Spinoza and Leibniz) Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Hume Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, Kant Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, Kant On Liberty, Mill "Modern Moral Philosophy", Anscombe "What is Capitalism?", Rand The Bounds of Sense, Strawson + "Rawls on Justice", Nagel "The Naturalists Return", Kitcher Sources of Normativity,…
……不懂科学的哲学家。那是和伯特兰·罗素合著《数学原理》（Principia Mathematica）的天才作家兼数学家 A.N. 怀特海。2) 亚里士多德《形而上学》（The Metaphysics） 3) 康德《任何一种能够作为科学出现的未来形而上学序论》（Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics） 4) 大卫·休谟的《人性论》（A Treatise of Human Nature）和/或《人类理解研究》（An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding） 5) 尼采《快乐的科学》（The gay science，意思是“欢乐的科学”） 6) 路德维希·维特根斯坦《哲学研究》（Philosophical Investigations）……
…philosopher that doesn't understand science. That's the genius writer and mathematician A.N Whitehead that worked with Bertrand Russell on Principia Mathematica. 2) Aristotle, The Metaphysics 3) Kant, Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics 4) David Hume's: A Treatise of Human Nature and/or An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding 5) Nietchze, The gay science (meaning "the joyful science") 6) Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations…
……不过已经过了很久了。也许是时候重读一遍，然后再来读这本书了！对感兴趣的人来说，如果你不想深挖，结合这本书可以参考的两本源文本是：康德的《未来形而上学序论》（Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics）和叔本华的《作为意志和表象的世界》（The World as Will and Representation），它们都属于 public domain，而且就该学科主题而言相对容易理解且条理清晰。
…been a long time, though. Maybe it's time to reread and then pick up this book! For those interested, the two source texts to consider in light of this book if you don't want to dig too deep, Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics and Schopenhauer's The World as Will and Representation are both public domain and relatively accessible/clear for the subject matter.
这个问题挺难回答的。能让我成为更优秀思考者的书，必须是那些硬核的书 / 能让我发生改变的书。排名前两名的肯定是伊曼努尔·康德的《未来形而上学序论》（Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics）。虽说它据称是《纯粹理性批判》（Critique of Pure Reason）的通俗易懂版，但至少对我而言依然极其艰深且烧脑。在啃完这些内容之后，变容易的可不单单是哲学。……
This is a hard. Books that made me a better thinker have to be the hard ones / ones that made me change. Top two would be Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, Immanuel Kant. Supposedly more accessible version of Critique of Pure Reason but still very hard and mind-bending for me at least. Not just philosophy was easier after wrestling with this content. The…
……传统上属于哲学的一部分。实际上，哲学与形式科学（逻辑学、数学、统计学和理论计算机科学）之间并没有真正的边界。想想康德在《未来形而上学序论》（Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics）第 13 节中遇到的问题：两个内在相同的物体必然是可互换的。但有些物体在内在特征上完全相同，你却无法互换它们。康德是个了不起的哲学家，但他也被难住了……
…traditionally part of philosophy. In practice there is no real border between philosophy and formal sciences (logic, mathematics, statistics and theoretical computer science). Consider the problem Kant faced in Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, §13. Two objects that are intrinsically alike must be interchangeable. But there are objects that are intrinsically alike and you can't exchange them. Kant was incredible philosopher but he was thrown…
……把那句话放到语境里看很有意思：“我一直觉得自己早年的一大幸事，便是在十五岁左右时，在我父亲的藏书室里偶然发现了一本康德的《未来形而上学序论》（Prolegomena to any Future Metaphysics）。这本书在当时给我留下了强烈且不可磨灭的印象，此后我在任何哲学阅读中都未曾再体会过这种感觉。两三年后，那过剩的……
…It's interesting to put that quote in context: "I have always felt it as a stroke of good fortune that early in life, at about the age of fifteen, I lighted, in my fathers library, on a copy of Kant's Prolegomena to any Future Metaphysics. The book made at the time a powerful and inextinguishable impression on me, the like of which I never afterwards experienced in any of my philosophical reading. Some two or three years later the superfluity…