……对于任何认为科学是、或者理应是理解世界的唯一合法途径的人来说，这都是必读之作。想了解更多信息，我强烈推荐：Frederick A. Olafson 的《Naturalism and the Human Condition: Against scientism》以及 Tom Sorell 的《Scientism》
…required reading for anyone who thinks science is or should be the only legitimate way of understanding the world. For more information, I strongly recommend: "Naturalism and the Human Condition: Against scientism" by Frederick A. Olafson and "Scientism" by Tom Sorell
…Wikipedia (which is pretty awful at philosophy), or the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (which is much better, but is very heavily slanted towards the Analytic perspective) and see: Tom Sorell's "Scientism": https://www.amazon.com/Scientism-Philosophy-Infatuation-Scie...
……而且，虽然没有直接探讨科学，但我认为福柯对话语中权力的批判非常切题。在这个帖子前面我提到过：Frederick A. Olafson 的《Naturalism and the Human Condition: Against scientism》，他的批判来自现象学视角；以及新康德主义者 Tom Sorell 的《Scientism》。上面这几位都不是后现代主义者。
…And, while not dealing directly with science, I think Foucault's critiques of power in discourse are very relevant. Earlier in this thread I'd mentioned: "Naturalism and the Human Condition: Against scientism" by Frederick A. Olafson, whose critique comes from a phenomenological perspective. and "Scientism" by Tom Sorell, who's a neo-Kantian. None of the above are postmodernists.
……对于任何认为科学是、或者理应是理解世界的唯一合法途径的人来说，这都是必读之作。想了解更多信息，我强烈推荐：Frederick A. Olafson 的《Naturalism and the Human Condition: Against scientism》以及 Tom Sorell 的《Scientism》
…required reading for anyone who thinks science is or should be the only legitimate way of understanding the world. For more information, I strongly recommend: "Naturalism and the Human Condition: Against scientism" by Frederick A. Olafson and "Scientism" by Tom Sorell
……去看看维基百科（它在哲学方面相当糟糕），或者斯坦福哲学百科全书（这个好得多，但严重偏向分析哲学视角），然后看看：Tom Sorell 的《Scientism》：https://www.amazon.com/Scientism-Philosophy-Infatuation-Scie...
…Wikipedia (which is pretty awful at philosophy), or the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (which is much better, but is very heavily slanted towards the Analytic perspective) and see: Tom Sorell's "Scientism": https://www.amazon.com/Scientism-Philosophy-Infatuation-Scie...
……而且，虽然没有直接探讨科学，但我认为福柯对话语中权力的批判非常切题。在这个帖子前面我提到过：Frederick A. Olafson 的《Naturalism and the Human Condition: Against scientism》，他的批判来自现象学视角；以及新康德主义者 Tom Sorell 的《Scientism》。上面这几位都不是后现代主义者。
…And, while not dealing directly with science, I think Foucault's critiques of power in discourse are very relevant. Earlier in this thread I'd mentioned: "Naturalism and the Human Condition: Against scientism" by Frederick A. Olafson, whose critique comes from a phenomenological perspective. and "Scientism" by Tom Sorell, who's a neo-Kantian. None of the above are postmodernists.