理查三世
Richard III
William Shakespeare · 初版 1597 年
2人推荐
6位读者提及
6次提及
“内载其陷害其兄克拉伦斯之险恶阴谋、残害无辜侄儿之惨酷谋杀、暴虐之篡位行径，以及其为人所憎恶之一生与罪有应得之死的全过程”（1597年版副标题）。
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
Richard III
William Shakespeare · 初版 1597 年
“内载其陷害其兄克拉伦斯之险恶阴谋、残害无辜侄儿之惨酷谋杀、暴虐之篡位行径，以及其为人所憎恶之一生与罪有应得之死的全过程”（1597年版副标题）。
正在加载完整评论……
……大学吗？我表示怀疑，不过这也只是我个人的看法。[0] 在不清楚读者对莎翁了解程度的情况下，我特别推荐《尤利乌斯·恺撒》，还有《亨利六世》中篇和下篇，当然还有它们的续篇《理查三世》。《理查二世》也很不错。《亨利六世》上篇我可以跳过，但建议读个剧情概要作为中篇的背景参考：依我看上篇明显水准不够，而且事实证明，人们普遍认为它大部分是由合作者克里斯托弗·……
…college? I doubt it, though that's just me. [0] Without knowing the reader's experience with the Bard, let me recommend Julius Caesar especially, also Henry VI Part 2 and Part 3, and of course their sequel, Richard III. Richard II is good too. I'd skip Henry VI Part 1 but read a synopsis as context for Part 2: Part 1 is clearly substandard IMHO and, it turns out, is believed to be mostly written by a collaborator, Christopher…
……而且是一部被严重严重低估的喜剧。我见过的最棒的一些喜剧桥段，其实就在莎士比亚所谓的悲剧里，这种情况跟我自己那充满悲剧的人生挺合拍的。重新翻翻《哈姆雷特》、《理查三世》和《麦克白》，里面有一大堆搞笑到不合时宜的单口金句。）话说回来，十五年前我妻子想带7岁和9岁的孩子们去阿什兰莎士比亚戏剧节。我跟他们说他们才不……
…and way way underrated comedy. Some of the best comedy I have ever encountered is in Shakespeare’s so-called tragedies, a situation that very much matches my own tragedy-marred life. Reread “Hamlet”, “Richard III”, and “MacBeth” for a barrage of hilariously inappropriate one-liners.) Anyway, a decade and half ago wife wants to take the kids, ages 7 & 9, to the Ashland Shakespeare Festival. I tell them they don’t…
莎士比亚写过尤利乌斯·恺撒、泰特斯·安特洛尼克斯、理查三世、亨利四世等等。如果当时根本没书可读，他是怎么了解这些人物的？
Shakespeare wrote about Julius Caesar, Titus Andronicus, Richard III, Henry IV, and so on. How did he learn about these people if there was nothing to read?
我们今天看到的是反英雄。悲剧的继承者是像《搏击俱乐部》、《教父》这类的电影。莎士比亚把反英雄用得炉火纯青：《理查三世》、《奥赛罗》和《麦克白》都引起了现代观众的强烈共鸣。我不太确定是否该把《哈姆雷特》归入这一类，这恰恰印证了你所说的。哈姆雷特的悲剧是希腊式的悲剧，……
What we get today is the anti-hero. The inheritors of the tragedy are movies like Fight Club, The Godfather, etc. Shakespeare used the anti-hero very well: Richard III, Othello, and Macbeth all resonate very strongly with modern audiences. I'm not entirely sure I'd put Hamlet in that category, and really points up what you're saying. Hamlet is tragic in the Greek sense,…
莎士比亚的《理查三世》也有事实错误。https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2013-02-07-source-shakespeares-ina...
Shakespeare's Richard III also inaccurate. https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2013-02-07-source-shakespeares-ina...
又想了想你关于莎士比亚的观点。我说「大多数」是错的。我应该说「著名的」莎士比亚：在《李尔王》、《理查三世》（Richard III）、《奥赛罗》、《麦克白》里好坏很清楚，它们仍然是关于人性的值得读的故事。在《亨利四世》第一部（I Henry IV）和《科利奥兰纳斯》里则是灰色的。《哈姆雷特》更复杂：它是部名剧，坏人很清楚，但好人……
Thought about your Shakespeare point a bit more. I was wrong in saying "most". I should have said "well-known" Shakespeare: Good and bad is clear in Lear, Richard III, Othello, Macbeth and they're still worthwhile stories about human nature. It's gray in I Henry IV and Coriolanus. Hamlet is more complex: it's a well-known play and the bad guys are clear, but the good…