大转型
The Great Transformation
Karl Polanyi · 初版 1944 年
12人推荐
17位读者提及
30次提及
为什么值得读
- 指出不能单纯依赖经济学理论理解市场
- 深刻剖析工业革命与现代世界的技术崛起
- 展现不同于斯密与马克思的独特社会视角
“在这部经济史和社会理论的经典著作中，Karl Polanyi 分析了工业革命带来的‘巨变’所引发的经济与社会变革。他的分析不仅阐释了自发调节市场的缺陷，还指出了不受节制的市场资本主义可能带来的严重社会后果。全新的导读材料揭示了 Polanyi 的开创性分析在当今全球化和自由贸易时代重新焕发的重要意义。”——BOOK JACKET。
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
两大核心分析流派是斯密和马克思。出于某种原因，很少有人知道波兰尼。去读读《大转型》（the Great Transformation）吧，绝对值得花时间。我来总结一下：斯密说人们喜欢讨价还价；马克思说人们喜欢当老板；波兰尼说人是会变的。
The big two analyses are Smith and Marx. For some reason, few people know about Polanyi. Read "the Great Transformation". It's worth the effort. I'll summarize: Smith says people like to haggle; Marx says people like to be the boss; Polanyi says people change.
……心理学或行为科学领域的人注定得拿奖。同样的事情也发生在比他们低两个档次的埃丝特·迪弗洛身上。如果她出了一本畅销书，千万别买。如果倾向于偏左的观念，读读波兰尼的《大转型》；否则，去读理查德·鲍尔斯的小说《财富》（Gain）。
…someone from psychology or behavioral science had to win. The same just happen to someone two rungs below their level, Esther Duflo. If she comes out with a popular book, don't buy it. Read Polanyi's "The Great Transformation", if inclined to left-ish ideas, or Richard Powers' novel "Gain", otherwise.
……因为“那样更健康”。为了极其微弱的好处，这付出的代价未免太大。这种想法曾引发了第一次世界大战。（我强烈推荐利亚卡特·艾哈迈德的《金融之王》和波兰尼的《大转型》）。反观我们现在正在做的事——放松流动性以维持实体经济运转，尽管它已经受到缺乏监管加上金融经济内部贪婪的损害……
…because it is “healthier that way”. Seems to be a big price to pay for a very nebulous benefit. Thoughts like that led to World War 1. (I highly suggest “Lords of Finance” from Liaquat Ahmad and “The Great Transformation” by Polanyi). As opposed to what we ARE doing loosening the liquidity strings to allow the real economy to continue to function, albeit damaged by the lack of regulations + greed in the financial economy…
……从定义上讲其社会副作用就是恶意的，不幸的是根本无需去“强加”什么罪名。大家总是屡屡忘记这一点。说到这个，我强烈推荐卡尔·波兰尼的《大转型》[1]，它早在20世纪40年代就触及了这种现象：> 从更宏观的理论层面来看，《大转型》认为市场不能单纯通过经济学理论来理解。相反，……
…its societal by-effects is malicious by definition, unfortunately there's no need to "ascribe" anything. Time and again people tend to forget this. Related to this I highly recommend Karl Polanyi's "The Great Transformation" [1] which sort of addressed this phenomenon back in the 1940s: > On a broader theoretical level, the Great Transformation argues that markets can not solely be understood through economic theory. Rather,…
……尽管篇幅长得多（且并不总是切题），而且水平略有参差。丹尼尔·耶金的《奖赏》（The Prize）专门探讨了石油的影响（及历史），对我来说极其开阔眼界。卡尔·波兰尼，《大转型》。工业革命与现代科技世界的诞生。http://www.worldcat.org/title/origins-of-our-time-the-great-... 大卫·克里斯蒂安，《大历史》。这要追溯到更早……
…though at far greater length (not always relevance), and slightly unevenly. Daniel Yergin's The Prize addresses specifically oil's impact (and history), and was mind-opening for me. Karl Polanyi, The Great Transformation. The Industrial Revolution and emergence of the modern technological world. http://www.worldcat.org/title/origins-of-our-time-the-great-... David Christian, Big History. This goes back somewhat before…
……人类之间的状态，古典经济学家不过是观察野外行为的特化人类学家。但这并不准确——卡尔·波兰尼和他那本伟大的老书《大转型》对此进行了深入探讨（以及一战的起因）。“自由市场”是18至19世纪由那些坚信古典经济学家就是此类人类学家的政客们强行施加给西方社会的……
…state of affairs among humans and that classical economists were merely specialized anthropologists observing behaviour in the wild. That’s not accurate though - Karl Polanyi and his great old book the Great Transformation really explores this (and the causes of WW1). The “free market” was deliberately imposed on western society in the 18th-19th century by politicians believing classical economists WERE these anthropological…