你可能会对伊丽莎白·爱森斯坦的作品感兴趣：《作为变革动因的印刷机》（The Printing Press as an Agent of Change）。我觉得未来可能会有历史学家写出《作为变革动因的 Twitter》。前提是我们未来还有历史学家的话。噢，找到了，2013年的：https://earlyamericanists.com/2013/04/29/twitter-as-an-agent...…
You might find Elizabeth Eisenstein's work of interest: The Printing Press as an Agent of Change I think we might see "Twitter as an Agent of Change" from a future historian. If we have future historians. Oh, here it is, from 2013: https://earlyamericanists.com/2013/04/29/twitter-as-an-agent...…
……互联网、万维网（1.0、2.0 以及移动端版本）等在政治和社会事务中的影响绝对是深远的。而且往往是极其出乎意料的，至少对最初的创造者来说是这样。伊丽莎白·爱森斯坦的《作为变革动因的印刷机》算是这方面的入门书之一，当然还有很多其他的。我目前正在拜读罗伯特·W·麦克切斯尼（Robert W. McChesney）的著作。
…Internet, the WWW (versions 1.0, 2.0, and mobile), etc., in political and social matters is absolutely profound. And often quite unexpected at least by the initial creators. Elizabeth Eisenstein's The Printing Press as an Agent of Change is one introduction to this, though there are many others. I'm going through Robert W. McChesney's work presently.
…manuscripts were better. Certainly, the Church didn't like losing control over information, but even it recognized that the technology was superior and could serve its own ends (see Elizabeth Eisenstein's The Printing Press as an Agent of Change for more about this, as well as the impact of printing on many aspects of society) - Illuminated manuscripts held on through the early 1600s (see http://www.bodley.ox.ac.uk/dept/scwmss/wmss/medieval/browse....).…
Elizabeth Eisenstein's The Printing Press as An Agent of Change (1979) is the classic work on this. It's the kind of book that book historians of the present often poke holes in, but the fact that people still argue with it is a testament to how good it is. It tackles…
…so. There's also a website devoted to his writings, highly recommended. 3. Changes in media and communications have profound influences on society, and always have. Look up Elizabeth Eisenstein, The Printing Press as an Agent of Change (1980). Her "Preliminary Report" (1968) is much shorter and gives the general spirit of the argument: http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/240164 (Full text available via http://sci-hub.cc)…
…dramatic changes to social structures and systems due to changes in media and epistemic is older than history itself -- it was one of those changes (writing) which started history. Elisabeth Eisenstein, The Printing Press as an Agent of Change, and Marshall McLuhan, The Gutenberg Galaxy, particularly address this.
你可能会对伊丽莎白·爱森斯坦的作品感兴趣：《作为变革动因的印刷机》（The Printing Press as an Agent of Change）。我觉得未来可能会有历史学家写出《作为变革动因的 Twitter》。前提是我们未来还有历史学家的话。噢，找到了，2013年的：https://earlyamericanists.com/2013/04/29/twitter-as-an-agent...…
You might find Elizabeth Eisenstein's work of interest: The Printing Press as an Agent of Change I think we might see "Twitter as an Agent of Change" from a future historian. If we have future historians. Oh, here it is, from 2013: https://earlyamericanists.com/2013/04/29/twitter-as-an-agent...…
……互联网、万维网（1.0、2.0 以及移动端版本）等在政治和社会事务中的影响绝对是深远的。而且往往是极其出乎意料的，至少对最初的创造者来说是这样。伊丽莎白·爱森斯坦的《作为变革动因的印刷机》算是这方面的入门书之一，当然还有很多其他的。我目前正在拜读罗伯特·W·麦克切斯尼（Robert W. McChesney）的著作。
…Internet, the WWW (versions 1.0, 2.0, and mobile), etc., in political and social matters is absolutely profound. And often quite unexpected at least by the initial creators. Elizabeth Eisenstein's The Printing Press as an Agent of Change is one introduction to this, though there are many others. I'm going through Robert W. McChesney's work presently.
……手抄本更好。当然，教会确实不喜欢失去对信息的控制，但即便教会也承认这项技术更优越，而且可以为自己的目的服务（关于这一点，以及印刷术对社会诸多层面的影响，详见伊丽莎白·爱森斯坦的《作为变革动因的印刷机》）——手抄彩绘本一直坚持到了17世纪初（见 http://www.bodley.ox.ac.uk/dept/scwmss/wmss/medieval/browse....）。…
…manuscripts were better. Certainly, the Church didn't like losing control over information, but even it recognized that the technology was superior and could serve its own ends (see Elizabeth Eisenstein's The Printing Press as an Agent of Change for more about this, as well as the impact of printing on many aspects of society) - Illuminated manuscripts held on through the early 1600s (see http://www.bodley.ox.ac.uk/dept/scwmss/wmss/medieval/browse....).…
伊丽莎白·爱森斯坦的《作为变革动因的印刷机》（1979年）是这方面的经典之作。当今的书籍史学家常常对这类书挑毛病，但大家至今仍在与之争论这一事实，恰恰证明了它有多优秀。它探讨了……
Elizabeth Eisenstein's The Printing Press as An Agent of Change (1979) is the classic work on this. It's the kind of book that book historians of the present often poke holes in, but the fact that people still argue with it is a testament to how good it is. It tackles…
……如此。还有一个专门收录他作品的网站，强烈推荐。3. 媒介和传播方式的变革对社会有着深远的影响，而且一直如此。去查查伊丽莎白·爱森斯坦的《作为变革动因的印刷机》（1980年）。她的“初步报告”（1968年）篇幅要短得多，交代了论点的总体精神：http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/240164 （全文可通过 http://sci-hub.cc 获取）…
…so. There's also a website devoted to his writings, highly recommended. 3. Changes in media and communications have profound influences on society, and always have. Look up Elizabeth Eisenstein, The Printing Press as an Agent of Change (1980). Her "Preliminary Report" (1968) is much shorter and gives the general spirit of the argument: http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/240164 (Full text available via http://sci-hub.cc)…
……由于媒介和认知方式的改变而导致社会结构与制度发生剧烈变革，这种现象比历史本身还要古老——因为开启历史的，正是这类变革之一（书写文字）。伊丽莎白·爱森斯坦的《作为变革动因的印刷机》和马歇尔·麦克卢汉的《谷登堡星云》尤其探讨了这一点。
…dramatic changes to social structures and systems due to changes in media and epistemic is older than history itself -- it was one of those changes (writing) which started history. Elisabeth Eisenstein, The Printing Press as an Agent of Change, and Marshall McLuhan, The Gutenberg Galaxy, particularly address this.