
差异与重复
Difference and Repetition
Gilles Deleuze、Paul Patton · 初版 1968 年
4人推荐
10位读者提及
11次提及
为什么值得读
- 提出摆脱传统辩证法框架的全新形而上学
- 以变异重复的独特视角阐释存在
- 在德勒兹核心独立著作中相对更具系统性
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……

Difference and Repetition
Gilles Deleuze、Paul Patton · 初版 1968 年
正在加载完整评论……
……浅尝一下:——吉尔·德勒兹(Gilles Deleuze)在形而上学方面写得极有力量,融合了六七十年代数学的诸多洞见:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deleuze#Metaphysics 可以去看看《差异与重复》(Difference and Repetition)。——阿兰·巴迪欧(Alain Badiou)在他的本体论中使用了集合论:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alain_Badiou#Mathematics_as_ont... ——不过我觉得他的本体论有所欠缺;他应该从……的失败中吸取教训
…dip your toes in the water: – Gilles Deleuze wrote powerfully on metaphysics, integrating many incites from mathematics in the 60's and 70's: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deleuze#Metaphysics Check out "Difference and Repetition". – Alain Badiou uses set theory in his ontology: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alain_Badiou#Mathematics_as_ont... – I find his ontology lacking though; he should learn something from the failings of…
……精神现象学 黑格尔 - 逻辑学 冯·克莱斯特 - 木偶戏 齐克果 - 致死的疾病 海德格尔 - 存在与时间 萨特 - 存在与虚无 萨特 - 苍蝇 萨特 - 恶心 德勒兹 - 差异与重复 卡夫卡 - 变形记 卡夫卡 - 城堡 莱姆 - 麦哲伦星云 莱姆 - 主人的声音 齐奥朗 - 崩溃的简史 佩索阿 - 绝望之书 沃尔夫 - 新日四部曲
…of Spirit Hegel - Logic von Kleist - Marionette Theatre Kierkegaard - The Sickness Unto Death Heidegger - Being and Time Sartre - Being and Nothingness Sartre - Flies Sartre - Nausea Deleuze - Difference and Repetition Kafka - Metamorphosis Kafka - The Castle Lem - Magellan Nebula Lem - His Master's Voice Cioran - A Short History of Decay Pessoa - Book Of Despair Wolfe - New Sun tetralogy
……相当好地概括了这个问题。德勒兹在这方面也很绝——我看到你提到了 BwO(无器官身体),而且 profile 里引用了 Nomadology(游牧学),但我认为你会特别喜欢《褶子》(The Fold)以及《差异与重复》(Difference and Repetition)的部分内容,这两部作品都把“存在(is)”看作是无休止地、不完美地重复呈现为“作为(as)”,很像人们理解的 DNA 变异复制自身的方式。心里记一笔,今晚得翻箱倒柜把藏书找出来,翻出一些……
…encapsulates the issue quite well. Deleuze is also excellent here -- I saw you mentioned BwO (and have Nomadology referenced in your profile), but I think you would particularly like The Fold and parts of Difference and Repetition, both of which approach the 'is' as endlessly, imperfectly repeated 'as', much the way one thinks of DNA mutatedly reproducing itself. Making a mental note to raid my library tonight and pull out some…
……这……信息量太大了。在我看来,尼采、斯宾诺莎、福柯和卡夫卡是大头,如果你不想读个十本关于十个你大概还没读过的哲学家的书的话。读完这些之后,你可以接着读他的主要博士论文《差异与重复》(Difference and Repetition),以及他在遇到加塔利之前的最后一部独著《意义的逻辑》(Logic of Sense)。他是在那些独著的间隙写出这些的,但在我看来,它们构成了一个整体,并以这两部作为终篇……
…That is... a lot. IMHO, Nietzche, Spinoza, Foucault, and Kafka are the big ones, if you don't want to read like, ten books about ten people you probably haven't read yet. You can follow these up with "Difference and Repetition," his primary thesis, and "Logic of Sense," his final solo work before meeting Guattari. He wrote these in between some of those solo works, but IMHO, they make sense as a unit, with these as the end,…
其中大部分都在试图摆脱黑格尔主义/马克思主义/精神分析,但他早期的作品(《差异与重复》、《意义的逻辑》)在可读性上要好得多,在我看来他最棒的是论述其他哲学家的著作,关于康德、斯宾诺莎、莱布尼茨的那些。哲学家晚期的作品往往都挺古怪癫狂的。
most of it is an attempt to escape Hegelianism/Marxism/psychoanalysis, but his earlier works (Difference and Repetition, Logic Of Sense) are much better in terms of accessibility, to me his best are books on other philosophers, on Kant, Spinoza, Leibniz. The late stages of philosophers' works are often quite wacky.
我入行 CS 的时间比硅谷期望的要晚,所以当我在读信息论的时候,我已经对后结构主义很熟悉了。其中很多内容不过是对《差异与重复》(Difference & Repetition)的旧调重弹;我现在找不到原话了,但我记得福柯曾称德勒兹是第一个真正属于这个时代(所谓“信息时代”之类的)的哲学家,他说得没错。 Knowing yo
I came into CS later than Silicon Valley would like me to have, and so I was already familiar with poststructuralism when I was reading about information theory. Much of it was just a rehash of Difference & Repetition; I can't find the quote now, but I recall Foucault calling Deleuze the first philosopher who was really of this period (the 'information age' or whatever) & he was right. Knowing yo