……说得没错，这本书错的小细节可远不止 Apple Computer 的创立这一处（我很惊讶仔细审阅他这本书的学院派经济学家们居然没人注意到这点：他把《Treatise on Money》称作凯恩斯“最著名的著作”，这就好比把 Wings 说成是 Paul McCartney 最著名的乐队一样扯。尤其让人吃惊的是，这段话居然还夹在一篇对凯恩斯著作本该十分了解的论述中间）……
…aren't wrong that it's also wrong about a lot more small details than the founding of Apple Computer (one I'm surprised none of the academic economists scrutinising his book picked up on: he describes Treatise on Money as Keynes 'most famous work' which is akin to calling Wings Paul McCartney's most famous band. That's particularly surprising in the middle of a passage about Keynes' work which is actually well-informed).…
……充斥着大量的粗心错误和可疑的辅助论据，而这些往往跟它的核心论点关系不大。DeLong 在整理他的清单时大概应该挑出来的一点是：书中把凯恩斯的《Treatise on Money》称为他“最著名的著作”，这简直就像把 Wings 说成是 Paul McCartney 最著名的乐队一样搞笑。
…with no shortage of sloppy errors and dubious ancillary claims mostly incidental to its actual arguments. One DeLong probably should have picked up when he was compiling his lists is referring to Keynes' Treatise on Money his "most famous work", which is a bit like calling Wings Paul McCartney's most famous band.
……各路博主列出的一长串清单，指出 Graeber 明显搞错了的各种鸡毛蒜皮的小细节，但据我所知（afaik），清单里既没包括你发现的那个明显的 Tyndale 翻译错误，也没包括那个在我看来扎眼得很的说法——声称凯恩斯的《Treatise on Money》是他最著名的著作……
…long lists of mostly-trivial stuff various bloggers have pointed out Graeber got obviously wrong, which afaik don't include the apparent Tyndale translation error you've spotted or the claim that Keynes' Treatise on Money was his most famous work that stuck out like a sore thumb to me...
……说得没错，这本书错的小细节可远不止 Apple Computer 的创立这一处（我很惊讶仔细审阅他这本书的学院派经济学家们居然没人注意到这点：他把《Treatise on Money》称作凯恩斯“最著名的著作”，这就好比把 Wings 说成是 Paul McCartney 最著名的乐队一样扯。尤其让人吃惊的是，这段话居然还夹在一篇对凯恩斯著作本该十分了解的论述中间）……
…aren't wrong that it's also wrong about a lot more small details than the founding of Apple Computer (one I'm surprised none of the academic economists scrutinising his book picked up on: he describes Treatise on Money as Keynes 'most famous work' which is akin to calling Wings Paul McCartney's most famous band. That's particularly surprising in the middle of a passage about Keynes' work which is actually well-informed).…
……充斥着大量的粗心错误和可疑的辅助论据，而这些往往跟它的核心论点关系不大。DeLong 在整理他的清单时大概应该挑出来的一点是：书中把凯恩斯的《Treatise on Money》称为他“最著名的著作”，这简直就像把 Wings 说成是 Paul McCartney 最著名的乐队一样搞笑。
…with no shortage of sloppy errors and dubious ancillary claims mostly incidental to its actual arguments. One DeLong probably should have picked up when he was compiling his lists is referring to Keynes' Treatise on Money his "most famous work", which is a bit like calling Wings Paul McCartney's most famous band.
那凯恩斯的《Treatise on Money》呢？
What about Keynes, "Treatise on Money"?.
……各路博主列出的一长串清单，指出 Graeber 明显搞错了的各种鸡毛蒜皮的小细节，但据我所知（afaik），清单里既没包括你发现的那个明显的 Tyndale 翻译错误，也没包括那个在我看来扎眼得很的说法——声称凯恩斯的《Treatise on Money》是他最著名的著作……
…long lists of mostly-trivial stuff various bloggers have pointed out Graeber got obviously wrong, which afaik don't include the apparent Tyndale translation error you've spotted or the claim that Keynes' Treatise on Money was his most famous work that stuck out like a sore thumb to me...